Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mateo / MTS

Channel

Mateo / MTS

@mateo_tradingfx

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

34,801subscribers

+18,485 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002105085845
TypeChannel
Username@mateo_tradingfx
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 October 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/mateo_tradingfx

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,25436,51525,384.57 August 2026 — 16,316 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,316 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,300 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,238 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,229 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,234 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,166 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,139 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,136 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,120 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,004 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,908 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,888 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,874 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,876 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,035 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,554 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,993 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,164 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,845 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,254 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,377 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,846 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,296 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,445 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,760 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,052 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,110 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,143 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,498 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,477 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,362 subscribers16 September 2026 — 34,838 subscribers18 September 2026 — 35,115 subscribers2 October 2026 — 35,609 subscribers7 October 2026 — 35,790 subscribers11 October 2026 — 35,960 subscribers14 October 2026 — 36,078 subscribers15 October 2026 — 36,303 subscribers16 October 2026 — 36,515 subscribers17 October 2026 — 36,422 subscribers18 October 2026 — 36,383 subscribers19 October 2026 — 36,280 subscribers20 October 2026 — 36,126 subscribers21 October 2026 — 36,027 subscribers22 October 2026 — 35,836 subscribers23 October 2026 — 35,709 subscribers24 October 2026 — 35,576 subscribers25 October 2026 — 35,444 subscribers26 October 2026 — 35,310 subscribers27 October 2026 — 35,236 subscribers28 October 2026 — 35,107 subscribers29 October 2026 — 34,990 subscribers30 October 2026 — 34,891 subscribers31 October 2026 — 34,801 subscribers34,8017 August 202631 October 2026
55 measurements spanning 85 days, net +18,485. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,915–39,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Oct 2026, 15:4634,801-90
30 Oct 2026, 14:4634,891-99
29 Oct 2026, 17:0934,990-117
28 Oct 2026, 16:5535,107-129
27 Oct 2026, 18:0535,236-74
26 Oct 2026, 19:3735,310-134
25 Oct 2026, 19:1035,444-132
24 Oct 2026, 16:1635,576-133
23 Oct 2026, 14:4935,709-127
22 Oct 2026, 13:3535,836-191
21 Oct 2026, 05:5936,027-99
20 Oct 2026, 07:1036,126-154
19 Oct 2026, 07:2836,280-103
18 Oct 2026, 07:0036,383-39
17 Oct 2026, 07:3136,422-93
16 Oct 2026, 04:3636,515+212
15 Oct 2026, 05:2736,303+225
14 Oct 2026, 02:3736,078+118
11 Oct 2026, 17:4035,960+170
7 Oct 2026, 06:3835,790first reading

Engagement

1,296 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 137 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.41%
avg views ÷ 34,801 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
586 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.895%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
592
of 1,296 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 497 of 586 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held1,296 (7 August 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total899,144
Reactions total7,055
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Oct 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 26s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 48 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

15,565 reactions across 892 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,78137.1%
👍5,46735.1%
🔥3,36121.6%
🥰5493.53%
👏3142.02%
😱270.173%
🍾160.103%
⚡120.077%
🙏110.071%
🏆90.058%
🤗70.045%
❤‍🔥60.039%
🎉20.013%
👀20.013%
🆒10.006%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 896 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,565 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 993 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mateo_tradingfx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 30 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Oct 2026, 20:37 UTC≈1,540 views13 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Photo

🚀 ¡Mira todas estas victorias de la semana pasada! Ya has visto algunos resultados — pero eso definitivamente no es todo ‼️ Aquí hay otro vistazo directo de las ganancias VIP 🥇 El VIP está creciendo rápido y los lugares son limitados cada día... 💹 Únete ahora para acceso de por vida a señales, educación y apoyo de una comunidad seria de trading. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ | 4.9/5 en Trustpilot 📥 ÚNETE GRATIS AQUÍ 👈 👉 Más Resu…

👍9❤4

30 Oct 2026, 20:07 UTC≈1,550 views12 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍5❤4🔥2🥰1

30 Oct 2026, 19:57 UTC≈1,550 views14 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Photo

TODAS LAS OPERACIONES FUERA Y QUÉ DÍA ❤️‍🔥 VIP depositó. Tú miraste💰 ¿Eso pica? Bien. Recuerda esta sensación. La próxima semana no tiene que ser así 😏 👇 ÚNETE A VIP AHORA @mateofx_official

👍9❤4🔥1

30 Oct 2026, 18:03 UTC≈1,570 views19 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Photo

🥇 SALA VIP - Estadísticas diarias de señales 🗓 30 de Octubre de 2026 El oro dio un movimiento amplio - el sistema funcionó a través de todo el rango: ventas desde la parte superior, compras desde el fondo. BTCUSD y USDCHF añadieron al total. 1) #USDCHF Sell @ 0.82842 TP2 +37 pips TP3 +81 pips 2) #XAUUSD Sell @ 4011 TP1 +30 pips 3) #XAUUSD Sell @ 4008 TP1 +30 pips TP2 +80 pips TP3 +160 pips 4) #XAUUSD Buy @ 3995 …

❤7👍7👏2😱2🥰1

30 Oct 2026, 17:57 UTC≈1,570 views13 reactionsread 31 October 2026

💸 El oro volaba hacia abajo - el sistema atrapó el movimiento y tomó el máximo Un día de trading fuerte: el oro hizo un movimiento brusco hacia abajo, abriendo oportunidades tanto para vender en niveles altos como para comprar en soportes clave. Las estadísticas de señal de la sala VIP están abajo 👇🏻

❤6👍5🔥2

30 Oct 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,580 views14 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Photo

🥇 ¿Cómo operar sin emociones: mito o habilidad? Una de las peticiones más frecuentes de los principiantes: «Quiero desconectar las emociones al operar». Pero seamos sinceros: Es imposible eliminar por completo las emociones. No eres un robot. Pero puedes aprender a no actuar bajo su influencia. Las emociones son naturales. Reaccionar es una elección. 👉 ¿Cómo desarrollar esta habilidad? 1) Opera según un sistema …

❤6👍5🔥2🥰1

30 Oct 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,560 views11 reactionsread 31 October 2026

💬 He preparado otra publicación útil e informativa para ti. Esta vez he decidido abordar un tema que afecta a absolutamente todo el mundo, desde los principiantes que acaban de entrar en el mercado hasta los participantes experimentados que ya cuentan con años de experiencia en el trading y la inversión.

❤5🔥4👍2

30 Oct 2026, 14:40 UTC≈1,580 views14 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Photo

¡Hemos lanzado una promoción única junto con PuPrime! BONO DEL 100% en tu primer depósito — y puedes usar estos fondos directamente en el trading. Cómo funciona en la práctica: Deposita 320€ → 640€ en trading Deposita 800€ → 1 600€ en trading Deposita 1 000€ → 2 000€ en trading ¿Cómo obtener un bono del 100% en tu primer depósito? Es simple: envíame la palabra clave "BOOST" y te contaré todos los detalles. 👉 @ma…

👍6🔥5❤2👏1

30 Oct 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,550 views13 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Video

1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣ - CÓMO VOLVERTE REALMENTE RENTABLE (leer) Te enviaré un enlace de invitación gratuito a mi comunidad privada, y todo lo que tienes que hacer para recibirlo... Simplemente envíeme un mensaje con la palabra «LISTO» ahora mismo y enviaré la invitación a las siguientes 25 personas. 💬 @mateofx_official Eliminaré este mensaje cuando se hayan cubierto todas las plazas

❤5🔥5👍3

30 Oct 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,570 views19 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Photo

🇪🇸 Historia de un miembro VIP de Salamanca: ¡cómo el trading lo sacó de su rutina y lo llevó a unos estables 700€ - 1.100€ al mes! A veces el cambio comienza con un simple momento: la vida parece volverse demasiado monótona, y una persona finalmente se da cuenta de que no quiere vivir así más y finalmente toma el control de su vida. Se unió a nuestro programa VIP sin expectativas particulares, solo quería aprender …

❤7🔥7👍3👏1🥰1

30 Oct 2026, 13:26 UTC≈1,560 views11 reactionsread 31 October 2026

📈 En el trading, muchas cosas se aclaran con el tiempo La historia a continuación es un ejemplo de cómo la constancia y el enfoque correcto eventualmente conducen a resultados sólidos 👇

🔥8👍3

30 Oct 2026, 12:34 UTC≈1,560 views16 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

GANANCIAS CONSECUTIVAS 📈 #XAUUSD TP1 Alcanzado, +30 Pips ✅ TP2 Alcanzado, +80 Pips ✅ TP3 Alcanzado, +160 Pips ✅ El impulso permanece firmemente a nuestro favor

👍8🔥6❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,296 posts we hold for @mateo_tradingfx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Oct 2026, 20:18 UTCAnonymous Poll397 voters

Después de ver los resultados de esta semana, ¿cuál es tu próximo paso?

  1. Quiero unirme a VIP38%
  2. Ya estoy en VIP y planeo escalar mi balance32%
  3. Ya estoy en VIP, contento con mi balance18%
  4. Solo observando por ahora12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Sept 2026, 18:29 UTCAnonymous Poll279 voters

¿Cuánto ganaste conmigo durante la última semana? ⁉️

  1. Gané 700€ – 1 500€ o más17%
  2. Gané 300€ – 700€21%
  3. Gané hasta 300€31%
  4. No soy VIP todavía, pero quiero serlo32%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTCAnonymous Poll302 voters

¿Cuánto ganaste con nosotros hoy, miembros VIP?

  1. Gané 700$ – 1 000$ o más18%
  2. Gané 300$ – 700$23%
  3. Gané hasta 300$26%
  4. Aún no soy VIP, pero quiero serlo33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 30 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mateo / MTS” (@mateo_tradingfx), 34,801 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mateo_tradingfx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.