Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Матч! Регби

Channel

Матч! Регби

@matchrugby

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,694subscribers

-95 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001951206728
TypeChannel
Username@matchrugby
DescriptionВсё о лучшей игре с мячом 🏉
Created9 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/matchrugby

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,6947,7907,7426 August 2026 — 7,789 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,790 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,775 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,770 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,752 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,750 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,740 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,727 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,713 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,708 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,696 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,715 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,744 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,776 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,764 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,766 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,752 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,758 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,752 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,762 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,755 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,745 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,739 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,725 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,715 subscribers14 November 2026 — 7,694 subscribers6 August 202614 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 100 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,680–7,804 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 08:577,694-21
9 Nov 2026, 17:467,715-10
6 Nov 2026, 13:267,725-14
3 Nov 2026, 16:187,739-6
31 Oct 2026, 06:357,745-10
28 Oct 2026, 00:387,755-7
24 Oct 2026, 20:187,762+10
22 Oct 2026, 04:317,752-6
18 Oct 2026, 16:417,758+6
15 Oct 2026, 09:597,752-14
12 Oct 2026, 12:167,766+2
5 Oct 2026, 17:187,764-12
28 Sept 2026, 12:017,776+32
18 Sept 2026, 14:217,744+29
14 Sept 2026, 11:397,715+19
11 Sept 2026, 07:217,696-12
6 Sept 2026, 10:227,708-5
1 Sept 2026, 19:597,713-14
29 Aug 2026, 10:097,727-13
26 Aug 2026, 00:187,740first reading

Engagement

127 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 7,694 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 127 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held127 (2 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total69,709
Reactions total1,610
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 15:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,470
Videos
≈677
Links
≈1,190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 52s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,228 reactions across 123 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,26529.9%
👍64915.4%
🔥63815.1%
❤‍🔥2786.58%
🤣2024.78%
🙏1273.00%
😭1132.67%
🤡1052.48%
👏992.34%
😁801.89%
👎791.87%
💯721.70%
⚡561.32%
💔521.23%
🤝431.02%
🏆400.946%
😎400.946%
😢380.899%
🎉290.686%
🤯230.544%
25 further kinds2004.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 127 of the 127 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,317 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 49 posts held from the last 30 days (18.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 14:48 UTC337 views13 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Сборная Аргентины выстояла в 13 человек. Это характер 🤝 Две желтых на 65-й минуте казались приговором. А после штрафной попытки – интрига была запредельной. Но итальянцы так и не смогли набрать очков. И «Лос Пумас» поднялись аж на третью строчку в южном полушарии. «Адзурри» остались на последней в северном 👀 🏉 Матч! Регби в MAX

❤10🙏2🔥1

14 Nov 2026, 11:13 UTC657 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Поражение «Спрингбокс» – вина тренерского штаба. Так считает Расси Эрасмус 👀 Коуч признал, что команда сыграла плохо. И он не собирается искать оправдания. План другой – все обдумать и найти решения. Расси посвятит этому всю следующую неделю. Снова проигрывать никто не хочет 🤝 🏉 Матч! Регби в MAX

❤6👍3🤬1😭1

13 Nov 2026, 22:31 UTC965 views48 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Пять карточек, шанс на камбэк и по три попытки у каждого. Сложнейшая встреча Франции и Южной Африки 🤜🏻🤛🏻 Люку забил все реализации. Этих очков как раз хватило, чтобы забрать победу. Для пятого бьющего в сборной Франции – очень хороший результат. Галтье не прогадал 😎 🏉 Матч! Регби в MAX

🔥29❤10😢5👍1👎1🤯1😍1

13 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC≈1,050 views20 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Южноафриканцы хотят взять французов опытом. Огромная разница по количеству матчей 🤯 Расси Эрасмус сделал ставку на проверенных регбистов. Последим, поможет ли это 👀️️️️️️ 🏉 Матч! Регби в MAX

❤13👍6❤‍🔥1

13 Nov 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,100 views31 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

«Перпиньяну» придется раскошелиться. Клуб должен регбисту 211 128 евро 🤯 Все началось весной 2021 года. Болельщик клуба заметил и сфотографировал Тибо Сюшье без защитной маски. Это были времена пандемии. «Перпиньян» сразу расторг контракт с игроком, посчитав, что это дисциплинарный проступок и недостаточная преданность клубу. Сюшье считал, что нарушение стало предлогом для расставания с ним, начал судиться и выигр…

👍19🔥7❤2🤪2❤‍🔥1

12 Nov 2026, 14:55 UTC≈1,240 views79 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Степан Хохлов выбыл на несколько месяцев. У регбиста – разрыв ахиллова сухожилия 😳️️️️️️ Это его первая серьезная травма за 10 лет. Теперь его ждет длительное восстановление. Здоровья парню. И скорейшего возвращения на поле 🙏 🏉 Матч! Регби в MAX

🙏62❤9😭7😱1

12 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC≈1,220 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

42 матча подряд за сборную. Маккензи не сдает позиции 😎 Серия началась со встречи против Намибии на КМ-2023. С тех пор регбист не пропустил ни один матч. Дэмиан завоевал доверии у трех тренеров. Достойно уважения 👍 🏉 Матч! Регби в MAX

🔥13👍9❤6

12 Nov 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,200 views27 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Дюпона поставили на позицию флай-хава на матч с Южной Африкой. Антуана ждет дуэль с Сашей 🔥️️️️️️ Главное преимущество француза – опыт и игровое мышление. У южноафриканца тоже это есть, но больше всего Фейнберг-Мнгомезулу умеет делать результат. Саша или Антуан? Последим завтра, кто окажется лучше 👀️️️️️️ 🏉 Матч! Регби в MAX

❤16❤‍🔥4🙏4🌚2👍1

11 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,220 views14 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Сборные Италии и Аргентины скоро зарубятся. Обеим нужна победа 🔥️️️️️️ Никто из них не смог обыграть соперника за последние пять матчей. Но у «Лос Пумас» ситуация чуть лучше – есть одна ничья. Кто кого победит в субботу? Пиши в комменты 👇🏻 🏉 Матч! Регби в MAX

❤9👍5

11 Nov 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,230 views16 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Обыграть Новую Зеландию – сложная задача. Уэльс и Шотландия подтвердят 🤭 «Олл Блэкс» доминирует над этими двумя сборными уже очень долго. «Чертополохи» пытаются выиграть уже 121 год, «Красные драконы» – 72. Кстати, у валлийцев скоро будет шанс все исправить – в субботу матч с Новой Зеландией. Но смогут ли? 👀️️️️️️ 🏉 Матч! Регби в MAX

❤9👍4🤪3

11 Nov 2026, 09:40 UTC≈1,250 views44 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Гастон Револь доволен регбистами «Стрелы-Ак Барс». Говорит, они могут играть на международном уровне 😍️️️️️️ Кстати, многие из них уже делали это. Из ярких примеров – Давыдов, Живатов и Созонов. Но, возможно, будут и новые. Надо подождать 👀️️️️️️ 🏉 Матч! Регби в MAX

❤17👍10🔥8🤣6👎2💯1

10 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,460 views146 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Сейчас все мысли только об одном. Кто станет чемпионом в «семерке»? 🏆 Главные фавориты: «Динамо» и «Стрела-Ак Барс». Чтобы гарантировать чемпионство, командам нужно выполнить несколько условий. Но еще не стоит забывать про «Енисей-СТМ», который набрал 48 очков за три тура. Может всё сложиться так, что трофей заберут красноярцы. Пока есть время, давай решим. Кто возьмет титул? 👀 ❤️ – «Динамо» 🔥 – «Стрела-Ак Барс» …

❤82❤‍🔥34🔥26👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @matchrugby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@matchrugby edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 November 2026
Most recent edit
14 November 2026

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTCFinal Results132 voters

Лучший игрок матча «Динамо» — «Стрела-Ак Барс»?

  1. 🚨 Егор Алексеев5%
  2. 🚨 Николай Гилёв17%
  3. 🚨 Эдуард Фуше26%
  4. 🚨 Болдуин Хансен7%
  5. 🚨 Кирилл Голосницкий16%
  6. 🚨 Лейтон Экстин13%
  7. 🐉 Рикерт Корфф3%
  8. 🐉 Герман Давыдов8%
  9. 🐉 Эдмунд Людик5%
  10. 🐉 Никита Вавилин2%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTCFinal Results187 voters

Лучший игрок матча «Енисей-СТМ» — «Красный Яр»?

  1. 🚜 Алексей Щербань2%
  2. 🚜 Тимур Маслов13%
  3. 🚜 Никита Барышников1%
  4. 🚜 Артем Ровский18%
  5. 🚜 Денис Симпликевич3%
  6. 🦅 Эрл Даури4%
  7. 🦅 Анеле Лунгиса10%
  8. 🦅 Джейсон Таумалоло46%
  9. 🦅 Михеил Ратиашвили4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTCFinal Results165 voters

Лучший игрок матча «Слава-МАР» — «Локомотив»?

  1. 🚂 Андиса Нтсила8%
  2. 🚂 Лисала Насеге10%
  3. 🚂 Сергей Янюшкин10%
  4. 🚂 Павел Сошин12%
  5. 🚂 Владислав Перестяк6%
  6. ⌚️ Семен Черноногов21%
  7. ⌚️ Алексей Наставшев8%
  8. ⌚️ Антон Наставшев5%
  9. ⌚️ Никита Егоров20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTCFinal Results169 voters

Лучший игрок матча «Динамо» - «ВВА-Подмосковье»?

  1. 🚨 Даниил Погодаев30%
  2. 🚨 Эдуард Фуше31%
  3. 🚨 Джейсон Барон10%
  4. 🚨 Джонатан Ренсбург6%
  5. 🚨 Роман Журавлев14%
  6. ✈️ Михаил Жлутков30%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Матч! Данк
@match_basket_dunk · 20,838
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 September 2026
Матч! Академия
@match_academy · 18,427
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Матч! Регби” (@matchrugby), 7,694 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matchrugby.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.