Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Betting IQ

Channel

Betting IQ

@matchiq_2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

52subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003709019185
TypeChannel
Username@matchiq_2026
Created20 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/matchiq_2026

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

395245.512 August 2026 — 39 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39 subscribers2 September 2026 — 47 subscribers11 September 2026 — 46 subscribers18 September 2026 — 48 subscribers3 October 2026 — 52 subscribers12 August 20263 October 2026
6 measurements spanning 52 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–54 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 15:3952+4
18 Sept 2026, 12:5648+2
11 Sept 2026, 06:3646-1
2 Sept 2026, 11:3447+8
12 Aug 2026, 20:0139no change
12 Aug 2026, 19:4939first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2144.7%
👍1634.0%
👌48.51%
🔥36.38%
👎24.26%
👏12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Mar 2026, 09:25 UTC137 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Bet placed. You can check our analysis below. Good luck

10 Mar 2026, 09:12 UTC106 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Atletico Madrid vs Tottenham Atletico Madrid are playing at home and are a team with quality in all areas of the pitch. They have lost their chance to win La Liga and are now focused on going as far as possible in the Champions League. They are an experienced team and have a coach who prepares very well for matches like this. Tottenham are struggling a lot and risk relegation from the league, so their main focus is…

❤1👍1

10 Mar 2026, 09:08 UTC90 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Newcastle vs Barcelona Newcastle are a team that plays physical and fast football. They are dangerous when moving forward, especially on counterattacks. They are playing at home and without much pressure because they are facing one of the strongest teams in Europe. Barcelona have one of the best attacks in Europe. They are a team that scores a lot of goals, but they have clear weaknesses in defense. They also strug…

❤1👍1

3 Mar 2026, 09:19 UTC101 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Bet placed! You can check our analysis above ☝️

❤2👎2🔥1

3 Mar 2026, 09:12 UTC92 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

FC Barcelona vs Atlético Madrid Second leg of the cup tie. Atlético won convincingly 4–0 in the first match. Barcelona will give everything to try to overturn the result, although it will be extremely difficult. They have one of the best attacks in the world and score a lot of goals. Atlético will take the field aiming to defend their advantage. Knowing their style of play, they will defend strongly and wait to str…

❤2

3 Mar 2026, 08:58 UTC74 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Everton F.C. vs Burnley F.C. Everton come into this match after a very important away victory against Newcastle United F.C. last weekend. They are currently in a solid position in the standings and can approach this game with less pressure. Playing at home, Everton are expected to be confident and create scoring opportunities, and they are likely to find the back of the net. On the other hand, Burnley do not seem r…

❤3

24 Feb 2026, 07:21 UTC93 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Todays bet is placed. You can read the match analysis below☝️

👍3🔥1

24 Feb 2026, 07:16 UTC79 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Atlético Madrid and Club Brugge come into this match after a crazy draw in Belgium in the first leg. Atlético play at home and will push hard for a win. Their season in Spain has been inconsistent, and elimination at this stage of the UEFA Champions League would be a major failure. Club Brugge, on the other hand, are an exciting young team with a philosophy of attractive, attacking football. They won’t come to Spain…

❤2

24 Feb 2026, 07:05 UTC66 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Inter vs Bodø/Glimt Inter come into this match after almost securing the title in Serie A. They lost the first leg 3–1 away in Norway, but now they will push hard to qualify and aim for a convincing win at home. Bodø/Glimt are very strong on their home ground, but in this game they will focus on defending the result. They are dangerous on the counter-attack and could score again in Italy. Still, Inter clearly have …

❤2

23 Feb 2026, 20:45 UTC61 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Todays ticket won. I want to tell you the matches we bet are good analysis and predictions. We don’t guarantee the win. If you like them you can bet them. Our analysis are based in statistics and teams characthers. We analise very long, but post them in short tearms for everyone to understand.

👍2👏1

22 Feb 2026, 18:00 UTC52 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Monday ticket 23/02/2026 You can check our match analysis above ☝️

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @matchiq_2026. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Betting IQ” (@matchiq_2026), 52 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matchiq_2026.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.