Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Master_vostokart

Channel

Master_vostokart

@master_vostokart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,286subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001731742448
TypeChannel
Username@master_vostokart
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/master_vostokart

Growth

3,2863,2953,290.57 August 2026 — 3,292 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,292 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,295 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,294 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,286 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,285–3,296 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:243,286-8
14 Aug 2026, 01:563,294-1
11 Aug 2026, 06:013,295+3
7 Aug 2026, 13:303,292no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:123,292first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.17%
avg views ÷ 3,286 subscribers
Avg views / post
203
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held9 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,825
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
531.3%
😍531.3%
🥰318.8%
🔥212.5%
❤‍🔥16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC132 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Разбить бутылку виски на свидании? ДА, если это арт-свидание в нашей студии! Многие думают, что совместное рисование — это только про нежные пейзажи и цветочки. А вот и нет! Посмотрите, какую пушечную интерьерную картину создали ребята у нас сегодня. Вход пошли: глубокий глянцевый черный, изумрудные переливы, осколки настоящего стекла, сплющенная бутылка Jameson и яркие красные акценты 💔 Создавать такой объемный

😍2❤‍🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC206 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Август — идеальное время, чтобы создавать воспоминания. И мы придумали, как сохранить этот месяц на холсте. Объемная, сочная, тактильная малина, которую мы создадим своими руками! Мы приглашаем вас провести один из летних дней в творчестве, красоте и шикарной компании. На мастер-классе вас ждет: ✨ Создание собственной объемной картины с нуля (навыки рисования не нужны!) ✨ Знакомство с техникой ✨ Полный релакс, пере

😍3

4 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC272 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✨ Магия, к которой можно прикоснуться своими руками. Вы замечали, как замедляется время, когда руки касаются мягкой глины? В этот момент отступает суета города, а в голове рождается чистое творчество 🤍 Мы знаем, как волнительно начинать с нуля, поэтому запускаем новый, очень уютный курс по керамике в «ВостокArt». Рядом с вами будет Ксения — профессиональный художник и наш самый бережный наставник. Всего за 4 недел

🥰2

3 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC310 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

7, 8 и 9 августа отменяйте все скучные дела. Мы выкатили расписание, от которого случается эстетический шок 💔👇🏼 Листайте карусель — мы собрали меню впечатлений, которое хочется забронировать целиком. Спойлер: вам захочется разорваться! 😅 От заливки океана эпоксидной смолой до ювелирных украшений, объемной фактуры и трендовой керамики... На этой неделе наша студия превращается в портал, где ваша Pinterest-лента стан

🥰1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @master_vostokart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,362,899 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Master_vostokart” (@master_vostokart), 3,286 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/master_vostokart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.