Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Masoudtechai

Channel

Masoudtechai

@masoudtechai

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

38,629subscribers

-2,452 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001954620144
TypeChannel
Username@masoudtechai
Descriptionعصر تکنولوژی آغاز شده
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/masoudtechai

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

38,62941,08139,85512 August 2026 — 41,081 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,081 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,032 subscribers14 August 2026 — 40,949 subscribers16 August 2026 — 40,791 subscribers17 August 2026 — 40,692 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,622 subscribers19 August 2026 — 40,551 subscribers20 August 2026 — 40,436 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,394 subscribers23 August 2026 — 40,285 subscribers24 August 2026 — 40,179 subscribers25 August 2026 — 40,123 subscribers26 August 2026 — 40,077 subscribers27 August 2026 — 40,003 subscribers28 August 2026 — 39,905 subscribers29 August 2026 — 39,873 subscribers30 August 2026 — 39,810 subscribers31 August 2026 — 39,726 subscribers1 September 2026 — 39,659 subscribers2 September 2026 — 39,546 subscribers4 September 2026 — 39,422 subscribers6 September 2026 — 39,257 subscribers10 September 2026 — 39,101 subscribers12 September 2026 — 38,944 subscribers13 September 2026 — 38,849 subscribers15 September 2026 — 38,780 subscribers17 September 2026 — 38,820 subscribers26 September 2026 — 38,629 subscribers12 August 202626 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 45 days, net -2,452. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,261–41,449 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 21:2038,629-191
17 Sept 2026, 13:2038,820+40
15 Sept 2026, 12:1738,780-69
13 Sept 2026, 23:1638,849-95
12 Sept 2026, 06:2138,944-157
10 Sept 2026, 01:0239,101-156
6 Sept 2026, 15:2139,257-165
4 Sept 2026, 04:3639,422-124
2 Sept 2026, 19:4239,546-113
1 Sept 2026, 16:3539,659-67
31 Aug 2026, 13:4339,726-84
30 Aug 2026, 15:3439,810-63
29 Aug 2026, 17:3639,873-32
28 Aug 2026, 19:3439,905-98
27 Aug 2026, 17:2440,003-74
26 Aug 2026, 14:3340,077-46
25 Aug 2026, 16:0240,123-56
24 Aug 2026, 18:4840,179-106
23 Aug 2026, 00:4740,285-109
21 Aug 2026, 13:1540,394first reading

Engagement

164 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.30%
avg views ÷ 38,629 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,210
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.802%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
84
of 164 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 80 of 83 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held164 (6 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total266,040
Reactions total2,067
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 03:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
212
Videos
91
Links
109

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
26m 34s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,301 reactions across 153 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,78554.1%
👍61318.6%
👏2266.85%
😁1414.27%
🤣1103.33%
👌952.88%
👎732.21%
🙏601.82%
🥰471.42%
🔥451.36%
❤‍🔥140.424%
😍140.424%
💘130.394%
😢120.364%
💯80.242%
😱60.182%
🤔60.182%
🌭50.151%
💔40.121%
🤷‍♂40.121%
8 further kinds200.606%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 155 of the 164 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,301 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 164 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 161 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @masoudtechai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 164 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,030 views27 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤19😢7👌1

28 Sept 2026, 20:27 UTC≈2,030 views3 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

این عکس رو به همراه پرامپت پایین بده به چت جی پی تی بر اساس شناختی که ازت داره لوازم سفرت رو توی چمدون میچینه اگه دوست داشتی خروجی رو بفرست ببینیم پرامپت: Fill the bag with things that resemble me

❤3

28 Sept 2026, 20:09 UTC≈1,950 views22 reactionsread 30 September 2026

یه چالش باحال بریم؟ مشارکت میکنید؟ حتما تعجب خواهید کرد

👍13❤8🔥1

27 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTC≈2,690 views22 reactionsread 30 September 2026

آموزش فعالسازی فلو روی موبایل https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdyVfFrojeF/?stkn=bDhpMHowcTBudWQ5

❤14👌4🙏4

27 Sept 2026, 08:24 UTC≈2,790 views18 reactionsread 30 September 2026
File

اکستنشن فلو مخصوص دسترسی به سرویسهای گوگل مثل فلو ، جمنای نوت بوک و .. قابل استفاده در موبایل و ویندوز لینک دانلود بروزر لمور https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lemurbrowser.exts

❤15👌3

26 Sept 2026, 16:28 UTC≈3,080 views64 reactionsread 30 September 2026

بالاخره یه راه حل قطعی برای دسترسی موبایل به فلو و ابزارهای گوگل پیدا کردم😊 امشب خیلی خستمه ایشالا فردا آموزشش،رو ضبط میکنم

👍44❤13👌5🔥2

25 Sept 2026, 11:27 UTC≈3,980 views23 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

یادتونه دیشب گفتم با هوش مصنوعی یه سری افراد جدیدی بیکار شدن؟؟ بفرما اینم ویدیوش https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdtVRkAoNmd/?stkn=MTN2YWxyZGJ1anJyag==

❤18👌5

25 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC≈3,390 views4 reactionsread 30 September 2026

The dust must originate from the actual launch point inside the depression. No teleportation. No sudden appearance without dust. No floating vehicle. No impossible trajectory. No duplicated vehicles. No vehicle deformation. --- NEGATIVE CONSTRAINTS Do NOT: - show the vehicle early - show the vehicle parked in the depression - reveal the vehicle before the hand reaches upward - make the vehicle emerge from flat g…

👌4

25 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC≈2,370 views9 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Create a photorealistic 12-second vertical 9:16 cinematic video using my uploaded avatar/reference image as the ONLY identity reference for the person. IDENTITY — ABSOLUTE PRIORITY: The person is me, based on the uploaded avatar reference. Preserve my exact facial identity, facial proportions, skin texture, hairstyle, body proportions and natural appearance. Do not beautify, stylize, alter, age, de-age or reinterpre…

❤8👌1

25 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC≈2,370 views6 reactionsread 30 September 2026

The dust must originate from deep inside the depression. It must NOT appear randomly. The eruption happens extremely quickly and dramatically. I remain calm and seated. --- 4.15–4.80 — SUV EXPLODES OUT OF THE DEPRESSION Immediately after the dust explosion, the large dark off-road SUV violently launches out of the depression. The SUV was physically hidden inside the depression until this exact moment. First t…

❤4👌2

25 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC≈2,270 views22 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

پرامپتش سه تیکه اس

❤13👌6🤣2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 164 posts we hold for @masoudtechai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTCAnonymous Poll339 voters

قطعا با دلار ۲۲۰ تومنی شما هم حوصله ی دربی رو نداری ولی یه رای بگیریم ببینیم کدوم طرفی هستیم😁

  1. استقلال43%
  2. پرسپولیس57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTCAnonymous Poll240 voters

چقدر کار با اینشات رو بلدی؟؟؟

  1. اصلا بلد نیستم32%
  2. خیلی کم بلدم26%
  3. در حد نیازهای خودم بلدم37%
  4. حرفه ای هستم9%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTCAnonymous Poll507 voters

اگه میخواستی فقط یک چت بات رو برای همیشه انتخاب کنی ، انتخابت چی بود؟؟

  1. Qwen1%
  2. Copilot2%
  3. Grok6%
  4. Chat gpt55%
  5. Kimi1%
  6. Gemini23%
  7. Z1%
  8. Claude11%
  9. Manus0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 164 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Masoudtechai” (@masoudtechai), 38,629 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/masoudtechai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.