Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mask Research

@masktyranny

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001656200045
TypeChannel
Username@masktyranny
DescriptionA collection of research to debunk mask myths, detail their harms, and strategies for fighting mask tyranny.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 11 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/masktyranny

Growth

187 August 2026 — 18 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 18:3118no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:1918first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 April 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Videos
20
Links
76

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 43s
Average length
1m 52s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

6 Mar 2024, 01:52 UTC21 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @standupsacramentocounty

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) updated a 2020 page titled "Prepare for Wildfires" and replaced the section reading, "Cloth face coverings will not protect you from wildfire smoke. Cloth face coverings that are used to slow the spread of COVID-19 offer little protection against wildfire smoke. They do not catch small, harmful particles in smoke that can harm your health". The 2022 updated version removed the ab

21 Feb 2024, 03:31 UTC101 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2024/02/nj-court-rules-refusal-to-wear-a-mask-not-protected-by-the-first-amendment/

19 Feb 2024, 04:59 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @professor_patriot_officialVideo

💥 Boom💥 Share this everywhere you can.

23 Dec 2023, 08:24 UTCviews —

Mask Research pinned «Great letters for parents to use re masking In case you need it: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LuB-z_qkRl1Rv6vMgB4LDSGVu12PIk-Z»

23 Dec 2023, 08:24 UTC28 viewsread 11 August 2026

Great letters for parents to use re masking In case you need it: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LuB-z_qkRl1Rv6vMgB4LDSGVu12PIk-Z

22 Dec 2023, 06:41 UTC29 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @VigilantFox

We were told that masks save lives, but it turns out the exact opposite is true. A study from Norway uncovered a higher likelihood of COVID-19 infections among individuals who regularly wore masks, compared to those who didn't. Key insights from the study: • This startling outcome emerged from a detailed analysis involving 3,209 participants, monitored over a 17-day period for their mask usage habits. • A notable

14 Dec 2023, 14:45 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @DrTenpenny

NEW - Systematic review published in the BMJ "fails to find any evidence of benefit" from masking children to either protect themselves or those around them from COVID-19. https://adc.bmj.com/content/early/2023/12/02/archdischild-2023-326215

2 Dec 2023, 17:38 UTC18 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @DrTenpennyPhoto

In case you missed this back in August 23

2 Dec 2023, 13:17 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/higher-incidence-covid-19-found-among-consistent-mask-wearers-peer-reviewed-study

28 Nov 2023, 07:17 UTC18 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @davidavocadowolfePhoto

Arm yourself with the Scientific Research on Why Facemasks: Do Not Work! Here are the Resources: https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/masks-dont-work-review-science-relevant-covid-19-social-policy-0 🥑Join: @davidavocadowolfe 🥑

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @masktyranny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mask Research” (@masktyranny), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/masktyranny.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.