🧠 مربی و منتور اصلاح سبک زندگی
کمکت میکنم روابط سالمتر، تصمیمهای آگاهانهتر و سبک زندگی بهتری بسازی.
📚 دورههای آموزشی | 🤝 همراهی آنلاین
📩 برای اطلاعات بیشتر و هماهنگی:
@masihamohseni
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
14 measurements spanning 13 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,389–11,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Aug 2026, 09:35
11,399
-11
18 Aug 2026, 11:18
11,410
-7
17 Aug 2026, 13:57
11,417
+6
16 Aug 2026, 05:15
11,411
-3
14 Aug 2026, 17:26
11,414
-2
13 Aug 2026, 10:26
11,416
-12
12 Aug 2026, 11:34
11,428
-6
11 Aug 2026, 12:48
11,434
+3
10 Aug 2026, 14:01
11,431
+5
9 Aug 2026, 12:39
11,426
-25
8 Aug 2026, 13:18
11,451
-10
7 Aug 2026, 13:17
11,461
-2
6 Aug 2026, 15:30
11,463
-5
6 Aug 2026, 11:04
11,468
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.6%
avg views ÷ 11,399 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,370
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
21 (26 June 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
13,490
Reactions total
321
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Aug 2026, 22:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
122
Videos
426
Links
129
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,035 reactions across 21 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
991
48.7%
❤🔥
510
25.1%
👏
171
8.40%
🥰
54
2.65%
🍓
50
2.46%
🕊
47
2.31%
💔
42
2.06%
🔥
40
1.97%
🙏
33
1.62%
😭
30
1.47%
🦄
17
0.835%
😢
10
0.491%
💘
9
0.442%
💅
8
0.393%
🥴
8
0.393%
💋
4
0.197%
😐
4
0.197%
🗿
3
0.147%
🤣
3
0.147%
🍾
1
0.049%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,035reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وقتی یکی نمیخوادت، چرا انقدر میخوای ثابت کنی ارزش دوست داشته شدن داری؟
🥱
گاهی رد شدن فقط ناراحتمون نمیکنه؛ یه سؤال دردناک توی سرمون میندازه: «پس مشکل من چی بود؟»
امشب درباره همین حرف زدیم؛ اینکه چرا دنبال تأیید کسی میریم که خودش ما رو نخواسته، و چطور از این چرخه بیایم بیرون
@masiha_mohseni
@masiha_mohseni
تو عاشق خودش شدی، یا آدمی که فکر میکنی یه روز میشه؟
👊
گاهی عاشق چیزی میشیم که هنوز وجود نداره؛
عاشق «اگه تغییر کنه»، «اگه درست بشه»، «اگه بفهمه…»
اما اگه هیچوقت تغییر نکنه، باز هم انتخابش میکنی؟
@masiha_mohseni
@masiha_mohseni
رمز گوشی؛ حریم شخصی یا نشونهی بیاعتمادی؟!
📲🫂
خیلیها میگن گوشی شخصیه و کسی حق نداره واردش بشه… اما یه سؤال مهم وجود داره: مرز بین حریم خصوصی و پنهانکاری کجاست؟
تو این پادکست دربارهی تفاوت اعتماد، امنیت عاطفی و چیزهایی حرف میزنیم که گاهی بدون اینکه بفهمیم، رابطه رو خراب میکنن.
@masiha_mohseni
@masiha_mohseni
-کسی که میگه عاشقمه، پس چرا بهم دروغ زیاد میگه؟!
😕
امشب راجع به مفهوم عشق واقعی بهتون گفتم و تنفاوتش رو با آنچه در روابط خودمون تجربه میکنیم براتون توضیح دادم!
@masiha_mohseni
@masiha_mohseni
وقتی پارتنرت میگه: «دو روز بهم زنگ نزن…»؛ این اسمش فضای شخصیه یا زنگ خطر؟
😔
گاهی آدمها برای آرامش به تنهایی نیاز دارن؛ اما مرز بین «فضای شخصی» و «قطع کامل ارتباط» کجاست؟
توی این اپیزود دربارهی همین مرز باریک حرف میزنیم؛ مرزی که میتونه رابطه رو امنتر کنه یا آرومآروم اعتماد رو از بین ببره.
@masiha_mohseni
@masiha_mohseni
چرا وقتی به کسی خیلی نزدیک میشویم، گاهی دیگر او را نمیخواهیم؟
😘
تا حالا شده یک نفر را خیلی دوست داشته باشی، اما بعد از مدتی حس کنی آن هیجان و کشش روزهای اول کم شده؟
در این پادکست با نگاهی به کتاب «جفتگیری در اسارت» از استر پرل درباره یک سؤال مهم حرف میزنیم: چطور میشود هم در یک رابطه عمیق بود، هم هنوز عشق و اشتیاق را زنده نگه داشت
@masiha_mohseni
@masiha_mohseni
کالبدشکافی رفتار آدمهایی که تا بهشون نزدیک میشی، یهو مثل یخ سرد میشن و
عقب میکشن.
❄️💔
توضیح کوتاه (توی این ویس چی میشنوی؟): توی این پادکست، اول با داستان ملموس «مریم» همراه میشیم که وسط یک رابطهی پر از امید، یهو با دیوارِ سردیِ طرف مقابلش روبرو شد. بعدش میریم سراغ ۳ علت روانشناسیِ اصلی پشت این غیبشدنهای ناگهانی (از ترس از صمیمیت گرفته تا تلهی شکارچی) و در نهایت ۳ تا قدمِ عملی یاد میگیریم تا بدون سرزنش کرد…
-نشونه ایی که ثابت میکنه یه مرد واقعا دوستت داره:
❤️
علاقه واقعی فقط با حرف مشخص نمیشه؛ با رفتار، توجه و ثبات خودش رو نشون میده.
در این اپیزود ۳ نشونه مهم علاقه واقعی رو بررسی میکنیم.
این اپیزود حتما بهت کمک میکنه💪
@masiha_mohseni
@masiha_mohseni
چرا همیشه از کسی که کمتر دوسمون داره بیشتر خوشمون میاد؟
💔
🎙 توی این ویس درباره دلیل این اتفاق، اشتباه گرفتن عشق با وابستگی و راهی که میتونه این چرخه رو بشکنه صحبت کردیم.
اگر این حس رو تجربه کردی، حتماً این ویس رو گوش کن🎙
@masiha_mohseni
@masiha_mohseni
-چرا بعضیا با ظاهر معمولی خواستگارهای بیشتری دارن؟
💍
اگر احساس میکنی با وجود همه ویژگیهای خوبت کسی برای آشنایی قدم برنمیداره، این ویس میتونه دیدگاهت رو تغییر بده. درباره باورهای اشتباه، دلایل واقعی و راهکارهای عملی صحبت کردیم
@masiha_mohseni
@masiha_mohseni
🥶رفتار سرد پسرها تو رابطه اولیه چی معنی میده؟
«امشب میخوایم راجع به این حرف بزنیم که وقتی تازه با یکی آشنا شدی و اون پیام و زنگش کمه، خودت پیام بدی یا صبر کنی؟ آیا باید بهش
تذکر بدی؟ یا بهتره ولش کنی؟»
@masiha_mohseni
@masiha_mohseni
❤🔥58👏28👍24🥰8🕊4🔥1🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @masiha_mohseni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 603,496 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“dub_masiha” (@masiha_mohseni), 11,399 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/masiha_mohseni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.