3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,686–1,688 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 13:32
1,686
-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:55
1,688
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:47
1,688
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 8 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16m 11s
Average length
1m 21s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,750 reactions across 15 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,127
30.1%
❤🔥
803
21.4%
💘
780
20.8%
custom 5199920062068176300
269
7.17%
🍓
262
6.99%
🐳
128
3.41%
💋
79
2.11%
🔥
69
1.84%
😨
60
1.60%
😭
46
1.23%
🥰
43
1.15%
😍
28
0.747%
😱
22
0.587%
🕊
10
0.267%
🍾
6
0.16%
🤮
4
0.107%
👾
3
0.08%
🤯
3
0.08%
🙏
2
0.053%
🤔
2
0.053%
3 further kinds
4
0.107%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,750reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2025 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
92
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 15 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maryttierr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 January 2025 to 1 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
DANGANRONPA V3
вот и готов наш видеопроект над которым несколько месяцев работали, вы можете его посмотреть на:
YouTube ⬅️
VK video ⬅️
TikTok ⬅️
будем рады услышать как вам!
через несколько дней выложим сюда ещё немного бэков
❤️❤️
KAEDE tg: @dehyaswife tt: @yueining
RANTARO tg: @alkavehwhen tt: @neorii
MIU tt: @my_mirok inst: my_mirok_
SHUICHI tg: @alkavehwhen tt: @noodle
KOKICHI tg: @otesxaru
TSUMUGI tg: @b…
ну как-то так ягодки
две новости
мы доделали наш видеопроект над которым несколько месяцев работали. ссылки на него в следующем посте, будем рады обратной связи 🥰
вторая новость - это видео наш последний совместный проект, поэтому мы над ним очень очень постарались. в ближайшем и дальнейшем будущем на данный момент совместных косплеев для соцсетей не планируется
мы не ставим крест на творческой деятельности, прос…
наши дорогие мы по вам соскучились 🥹
когда выдаётся выкрасть время понемножку косплеим
параллельно сейчас работаем над большим для нас проектом в новом формате, о котором писали в предыдущем посте, завлекли в него участвовать 10 человек!! как будет готово обязательно покажем 🩷 если тг в россии будет работать, хах 🥹
сейчас по ощущениям как будто в китайфд совсем затишье настало.. или может нам так кажется
как у вас де…
всем здравствуйте
мы немножко подадим признаки жизни 🤏🤏
на днях посетили наш городской фестиваль, поймали вайбик и держимся за него, к нам пришла идея, которую прям захотелось организовать и сделать, а вслед за ней ещё парочка мелких задумок
такого не было давно и долго, сейчас планируем делать пробовать, если будут хорошие результаты которые нас устроят они естественно появятся здесь)
больше новостей @fupenzihuaya…
катю же можно было увидеть сегодня на ярмарке в рукхадевате
потихоньку возвращаемся в прежнее русло (пытаемся)
надеемся в следующий раз объединимся уже вдвоем и с камерой 🙏
сегодня наши планы разрушились и наши пути разминулись 😞
собирались пойти вдвоем на ярмарку, но машенька разболелась и сидела дома красиво снимала эльвиру из "гадкой сестры"
можете полюбоваться 🤌
что произошло....?
что происходило..?
история как нас не посадили за убийство подруги
уложили эти полгода в 8 минут
(нам кринжово выкладывать видео спустя такое долгое время, сделайте вид что никакой паузы не было 🥰🥰)
видеоответ для небезразлично интересующихся живы ли мы
слушаем и не осуждаем
ладно, можете и осудить
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @maryttierr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,033,877 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@maryttierr named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@kanarimiyamoto named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@kyroo__kyrochka named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@tule4ka_ named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎐малина садовая🎐” (@maryttierr), 1,686 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maryttierr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.