Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

мари паш(т)ет

@marycosp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,749subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002085395053
TypeChannel
Username@marycosp
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/marycosp

Growth

1,7491,7511,7507 August 2026 — 1,751 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,751 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,749 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,749–1,751 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:221,749-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:011,751no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:001,751first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.2%
avg views ÷ 1,749 subscribers
Avg views / post
510
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held14 (27 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total6,636
Reactions total793
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

793 reactions across 13 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓18122.8%
custom 524941996817648849512816.1%
custom 5204451725011860637769.58%
custom 5368778466541994606617.69%
custom 5204264082185666996597.44%
custom 5276390683463140358556.94%
custom 5190768942754324589445.55%
custom 5384355312197208242324.04%
custom 5188365040968808895303.78%
custom 5386803946067101839283.53%
custom 5328201831732515280273.40%
custom 5431656259474437186192.40%
custom 5350329176823990607151.89%
custom 5248997519488202086141.77%
custom 5474501590498952692121.51%
custom 5231471742228125655111.39%
custom 538662872428632777510.126%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 793reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marycosp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC289 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

осталось откопать где-то шляпу и пошло поехало 😀😀 marishkiss #айко

custom 536877846654199460621custom 52489975194882020869custom 52314717422281256556🍓4custom 52494199681764884952custom 52763906834631403581custom 53282018317325152801custom 53503291768239906071

Signed мари паштетная

3 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC379 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

100 «🤩» и прода за репосты расцелую эти ваши новомодные виды постов… еле разобралась че куда

custom 527639068346314035816🍓7custom 51907689427543245891custom 53282018317325152801custom 53503291768239906071

Signed мари паштетная

3 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC402 views160 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 524941996817648849598custom 536877846654199460631custom 519076894275432458923custom 52763906834631403582custom 53282018317325152802custom 53503291768239906072🍓1custom 52489975194882020861

Signed мари паштетная

2 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC453 views87 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

кто кого копирует? 🤩 marishkiss #джайро

🍓39custom 532820183173251528017custom 524941996817648849513custom 52763906834631403584custom 53687784665419946064custom 51907689427543245893custom 52314717422281256553custom 52489975194882020863

Signed мари паштетная

2 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC457 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026

СМЕНА КАРАУЛА что за имбу мне нарисовали посмотритееее

custom 527639068346314035830custom 519076894275432458911custom 53503291768239906079🍓2custom 52314717422281256551custom 52494199681764884951custom 53687784665419946061

Signed мари паштетная

2 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC459 views89 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

после фестивалей я вкусно ела… а потом еще раз… и еще… и все благодаря RA’MEN 🤩🤩 не была в точке на Большой Серпуховской, хотя очень хотела, в следующий раз надо наверстать 🤩 marishkiss #юкако

🍓38custom 518836504096880889518custom 524941996817648849514custom 53282018317325152806custom 51907689427543245895custom 53687784665419946064custom 52763906834631403582custom 52314717422281256551

Signed мари паштетная

1 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC481 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

спустя тысячу лет у меня намечаются КОЛЛАБЫ 😳 че дум, за какого я персонажа в них?

🍓30custom 547450159049895269211custom 53868039460671018399custom 51907689427543245891custom 52489975194882020861

Signed мари паштетная

31 Jul 2026, 21:43 UTC531 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

на каком фесте вы бы хотели увидеть меня больше всего? хотела бы я быть на обоих, но техникой клонирования не обладаю…

  1. мэджик (7 ноя)52%
  2. константа (27 сен)74%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 51883650409688088953🍓2

Signed мари паштетная

31 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC536 views78 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

мой главный косплан после слива её песни и сегодняшнего стрима: вот бы дропнули костюмы на нее уже… сколько можно ждать

custom 520445172501186063743🍓23custom 538435531219720824210custom 54316562594744371862

Signed мари паштетная

28 Jul 2026, 03:38 UTC714 views127 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

умеют же красиво фоткать в этой вашей московии! порадуйте реакциями в честь закончившейся премки… фотограф marishkiss #юкако

custom 520426408218566699659custom 520445172501186063733custom 538435531219720824222🍓9custom 53866287242863277751custom 53868039460671018391custom 54316562594744371861custom 54745015904989526921

Signed мари паштетная

28 Jul 2026, 03:32 UTC608 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

царство небесное старому составу клея кристалла… аминь 🕊️

custom 543165625947443718616custom 51883650409688088959🍓7

Signed мари паштетная

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @marycosp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 21:43 UTCAnonymous Poll108 voters

на каком фесте вы бы хотели увидеть меня больше всего? хотела бы я быть на обоих, но техникой клонирования не обладаю…

  1. мэджик (7 ноя)52%
  2. константа (27 сен)74%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 311,491 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“мари паш(т)ет” (@marycosp), 1,749 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marycosp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.