Channel
@maryam_ghotB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,651subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001081146400 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maryam_ghotB |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maryam_ghotB |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 1,651 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 1,654 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 1,655 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 1,658 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 1,658 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (1 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,201 |
| Reactions total | 211 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
205 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 175 | 85.4% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 11.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.976% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.488% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌿 تأملی با رامانا ماهاراشی ««سکوت، گویاترین آموزش است.»» گاهی آنقدر درگیر پاسخ پیدا کردن میشویم که فراموش میکنیم آرامش، در سکوت هم خودش را نشان میدهد. لازم نیست همیشه ذهن را وادار به فکر کردن کنیم؛ گاهی فقط کافی است شاهد آن باشیم. ✨ تمرین امروز: ۵ دقیقه در سکوت بنشین. بدون تلاش برای تغییر افکار، فقط آمدن و رفتن آنها را تماشا کن. هر بار که ذهنت درگیر شد، بهآرامی توجهت را به نفس برگردان. 🍃 شاید آنچه دنبالش هس…
❤5
Signed Home
آره منم خیلی وقتا زورم نمیرسه مثل تو، مثل همهمون 🙌🏻 و این قدرت منه که اعتراف کنم بهش باور کن قدرته
❤13
پست آخرم ببین بعد از جلسهی رواندرمانی خودم ضبط کردم تا همهتون اوج آسیب پذیری یه درمانگرو ببینید شاید جرئت کردید و توی دنیایی که همه دارن هولتون میدن به قوی بودن به جاش اعتراف کردید به آدم بودن🤍
❤11
بعد از خودکشی پسر یالوم، چند تا از مراجعینم توی جلسه درمان وقتی داشتن رنجهاشونو باهام قسمت میکردن آخر جلسه ازم عذرخواهی کردن که باعث شدن حال من بد بشه وقتی عمیق شدیم روی این عذرخواهی فهمیدیم خیلییامون از خودکشی پسر یالوم ترسیدیم ترسیدیم چون معناش برامون این بود زور آگاهی هم شاید یه وقتایی به رنج نرسه ترسیدیم چون فهمیدیم هنوز این توهم که آدم بزرگا باید قوی باشن درون ما زندهست مثل بچگییامون که نمیتونستیم بپذیری…
❤15
من مخالف ازدواج نیستم به نظرم تشکیل خانواده و تعهد رسمی میتونه قشنگ باشه من خودمم دوسش دارم اما نه برای همه، اما نه به عنوان یه نقطهای از ارتباط که بلاخره باید تیکش بزنیم نه به هر قیمتی❤️🫂
❤14
امیدوارم اونقدر آگاهی انتشار پیدا کنه تا هیچ دو نفری به خاطر یه سری ترس و محدودیت قراردادی رو امضا نکنن که دنیایی از کارما برای خودشون و آینده به جا بذارن!
❤11
تا وقتی این سوالارو از خودمون نپرسیم هر روز آمار طلاق بیشتر از روز قبل بالا میره واقعا یه جا میخوندم برای اینکه آمار طلاق رو بیاریم پایین راهش اینه آمار ازدواج رو کمتر کنیم
❤7👍2
و عمیقا معتقدم ازدواج برای هر شخصیتی مناسب نیست لباسی نیست که توی تن همه خوشگل بشینه باید درک کنی برای تو مناسب هست؟ الان آمادهی بستن یه قرارداد هستی؟ روحت اونقدر آزاد هست که بتونی به وقتش اگر نیاز شد از قرارداد خارج بشی؟
❤9👌1👍1
مثلا من ازدواج رو یه قرارداد رسمی و اجتماعی میبینم نه ضمانتی برای عشق، نه حتی نشونهی صمیمیت و نه نقطهای که حس کنیم خب بلاخره ازدواج کردیم و رسیدم بهم
❤8👍3
الان دیگه سوال اینه من کنار چه آدمی میتونم روحمو ارتقا بدم؟ میتونم رشد کنم؟ و آیا برای این اتفاق در حال حاضر باید ازدواج کنم؟ یعنی اجازه ندید ازدواج یه نقطهای از ارتباط بشه براتون که مثلا خب ۵ سال تو رابطه عاطفی بودیم پس حالا باید ازدواج کنیم!
❤7👍4
هر کسی توی یه فرمی از ارتباط عاطفی احساس امنیت میکنه و میتونه روحشو ارتقا بده و واقعیت اینه که درسته ازدواج یکی از فرمهای قدیمی و متداول ارتباط هست اما تنها مدل و فرم نیست از نظرم با این سرعت آگاهی، ازدواج طی چند سال آینده تا حد خوبی منسوخ میشه و آدما میتونن با فرمهای دیگهی ارتباط عاطفی بیقضاوت کنار هم باشن
❤7👍3👎1
از چه جایگاهی میاد این تصمیم برای ازدواج؟ از جایگاه آگاهی؟ ترس؟ صرفا چون طبق نرم جامعه پیش برم؟ به نظرم سوال به شدت مهمییه
❤7👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @maryam_ghotB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Maryam_ghotbi” (@maryam_ghotB), 1,651 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maryam_ghotB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.