Channel
@marx_and_hist
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
533subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001163513507 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marx_and_hist |
| Description | A channel about the history of Marxism, Marxist approaches to history and social history. Materials will be published in English (#en), German (#de), Ukrainian (#ua), and Russian (#ru). #podcasts #documentary #lecture #books #article #memes #fiction |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marx_and_hist |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 533 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 533 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (17 May 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 431 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
90 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 41 | 45.6% | |
| ❤ | 33 | 36.7% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 8.89% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 6.67% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Iván Szelényi (1938–2026), the Hungarian sociologist, has died after a long illness, in the 88th year of his life. Szelényi was one of the most influential scholars of socialist and post-socialist societies. Szelényi’s scholarship occupies a central place in the sociology of state socialism and post-socialist transformation. His studies of class formation, intellectuals, entrepreneurship, poverty, and inequality shap…
😢4👍2
Here are a few photos I took at the California African American Museum in LA and the Black Panther Museum in Oakland.
👍6
I haven’t posted in a while - too much work. Here I've put together a short selection of great #podcasts on the revolutionary Black movement in the United States - from its connections with the Comintern and the CPUSA to the emergence of an independent Marxist workers’ movement in Detroit. Black Radicalism and the USSR — The Eurasian Knot Meredith Roman and Minkah Makalani on Black radicalism, the Comintern, and So…
❤6
📚 Сучасна історична наука визначає початком формування націй кінець XVIII століття. Утім, чимало істориків і далі шукають нації в античності, середньовічних королівствах і там, де люди ніколи не мислили себе в національних категоріях 🦖 Проєктуючи сучасне розуміння нації на далеке минуле, вони залишають поза увагою класові відносини, імперії, релігійні та локальні спільноти. Внаслідок чого історія починає виглядати …
❤5
На Медузе вышел хороший подкаст с украинским историком Георгием Касьяновым о конфликте памятей между Украиной и Польшей, а также об исторических ОУН и УПА. Советую всем, кто хочет разобраться в теме. #ru #podcast
👍10👎2❤1
Чи має Україна радянську історію? 🤷🏻 Після розпаду СРСР у багатьох історичних наративах радянська епоха зображується як завершений, віддалений або навіть екзотичний світ. Водночас Україну зазвичай розглядають або як жертву імперського панування, або як простір національного відродження. Та чи не губиться в такій оптиці власне радянський досвід України? І чому ми так вперто від нього відмовляємося? Про важливість ц…
❤8👍2
A Conversation with Jairus Banaji on A Brief History of Commercial Capitalism #en #ua #article #history #theory Jairus Banaji is one of the most original Marxist historians. In A Brief History of Commercial Capitalism, Banaji intervenes in the classic Marxist debate on the transition to capitalism. His argument should be read as a challenge to Political Marxism (Brenner/Wood, I've already written about them and Chibb…
❤3
Two great historians have passed away in the last few days - Alex Rabinowitch, an specialist on the Russian Revolution, and an Italian microhistorian Carlo Ginzburg. His Cheese and Worms was a delight to read during my undergraduate studies; after that, I dove into microhistory for a couple of months. Sean Guillory just published a wonderful interview with Rabinowitch that he recorded back in 2017. #en From Guillo…
❤6😢2👍1
"The Roots and Afterlives of Soviet Sciences" (as part of the Cambridge seminar Reconsidering Soviet Studies) #en #lecture #event #history 10 June, 17:30 BST, Jesus College, Fulburn Room, or via Zoom https://zoom.us/j/95153676755 Ben Potter: "The Intellectual and Institutional Roots of Marxism in Linguistics: The Case of Nikolai Marr" Isabel Jacobs: "Concepts of Hybridity and Symbiosis in (Post-)Soviet Science and …
❤3
"Angles of Vision" by Dylan Riley #en #article What is the relationship between Marx’s and Weber’s interpretations of capitalism? Rivers of ink have run seeking to synthesize or counterpose the two great analysts of capitalism... The contrast between the two does not lie primarily in their claims about the origins of capitalism. ... [T]he main issue lies elsewhere, in their standpoints or perspectives. Lukács perhaps…
👍5
МАНІФЕСТ ЗА НЕЗАЛЕЖНЕ РЕВОЛЮЦІЙНЕ МИСТЕЦТВО Якщо для розвитку матеріальних виробничих сил революція вимушена встановити соціалістичний режим централізованого плану, то для розвитку інтелектуальної творчості з самого початку слід установити анархічний режим індивідуальної свободи. Жодної влади, жодного диктату, аніяких слідів командування! Напередодні Другої світової війни було чітко видно, що тоталітарні режими, у …
👍4❤1
До дня народження Ґео Шкурупія (1903-1937), одного з найцікавіших українських поетів, "короля футуропрерій", публікую статтю Романа Черевко про його шумову революцію. To mark the birthday of Geo Shkurupii (1903–1937), one of the most fascinating Ukrainian poets and the “king of the futuroprairies,” I am publishing an article by Roman Cherevko about his “noise revolution.” #ua #article #history
🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @marx_and_hist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 969,448 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Marxism and history” (@marx_and_hist), 533 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marx_and_hist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.