Channel
@martinyuk_chronicles
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
91subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002386102561 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @martinyuk_chronicles |
| Description | Личный канал актёра, режиссёра, сценариста, продюсера, журналиста и, в целом, неплохого человека. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/martinyuk_chronicles |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 91 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 91 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 45.3% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 24.0% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 6.67% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 5.33% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Но Звягинцеву же дают бабки спонсоры, хотя он не про массовое кино», — оппонирует мне по следам позапрошлого поста один умница-режиссёр, надежда российского кинематографа (действительно очень одарённый). Он искренне думает, что этим оригинальным, неожиданным и сильным аргументом кладёт на лопатки искренне заюлуждающегося меня. Но нет, не кладёт. Аргумент этот не оригинальный, ожидаемый и вовсе не сильный. Он вообще…
❤1👍1
5 июля был зван на юбилей к режиссёру, сценаристу и актёру Андрею Арчакову. Это были 10 незабываемых часов на природе (семья арендовала большую беседку под шашлыки в гостиничном комплексе «Лось») в окружении удивительных людей — из индустрии и около неё. 🎬 Среди традиционных тостов и угощений был один особенный десерт — трейлер нового короткометражного триллера «Маги без времени», к созданию которого я приложил скр…
🔥2❤1❤🔥1
Знакомьтесь, самый популярный вопрос в нашем блоге: «Я не хочу ориентироваться на тренды. Хочу делать то, что мне нравится и ЗАРАБАТЫВАТЬ ДЕНЬГИ. Это возможно?» На этот вопрос есть два честных ответа: а) Блядь… б) Да блядь!!! На самом деле этот вопрос — тест на снобизм для любого профессионала. Лежишь ты на вершине, душа продана, на теле 38 анальных отверстий, и вот приходит это чудо с косичками и спрашивает: «А мо…
👍2👀1👎1
В ТГ-канале Николая Картозии наткнулся на очень дельный пост, который тут же переслал адресно нескольким молодым режиссёрам, с которыми ранее говорил точно об этом же. Проблема «монетизации гения» стара как мир, просто в разные эпохи она имела свои оттенки и нюансы. В дорыночную эпоху, когда функции единого Генерального продюсера выполняло государство, а место нынешних продакшн-компаний занимали худсоветы гениям, ищ…
❤1👍1
Остановись, мгновенье, ты прекрасно! Божественная красота❤️
❤3❤🔥1🔥1
Рыжий кот сорвал самый драматичный момент «Ромео и Джульетты». Пока актёры два часа вели зрителей к трагическому финалу, на сцену вышел кот, улёгся рядом с «мёртвым» Ромео и начал играться с его волосами. Вместо слёз зал взорвался приступом смеха. Милота дня. 👉 Топор +18. Подписаться
😁3❤1
Я б актёру дал сразу «Золотую маску» и Заслуженного. Ну и коту, конечно! 👇
Домострой заказывали?😱☺️
🥰2❤1
А среди моих подписчиков же есть гики, геймеры — кто любит коротать вечера не только за просмотром кино, но и игрушками на компе? Для вас, дорогие, минутка рекламы. Очень одарённый парень-художник, с которым я собираюсь работать на ближайших проектах, создаёт свою игровую вселенную, в которой будет очень рад новым участникам-игрокам. Каюсь, я сам довольно далёк от интернет-игрушек, как-то «переболел» этим давно, но …
❤2🔥2
Зарисовочка🎬
❤2🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4🔥2🥰1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @martinyuk_chronicles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 314,919 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МАРТЫНЮК_ХРОНИКИ🎩” (@martinyuk_chronicles), 91 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/martinyuk_chronicles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.