Mars Protocol News & Announcements pinned «Martians, today we share our final update. The wind-down of Mars Protocol, as approved in MRC-165, is now fully complete. All liquidation LTVs have been set to 0, remaining borrow positions have been liquidated, and every last bit of user funds, held in credit…»

Channel
Mars Protocol News & Announcements
@martiannews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,460subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001541316894 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @martiannews |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/martiannews |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 1,460 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 1,464 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 1,470 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 1,471 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 1,476 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 1,477 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 1,483 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 1,485 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:19 | 1,489 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 1,491 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:50 | 1,492 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 1,493 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 1,493 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Martians, today we share our final update. The wind-down of Mars Protocol, as approved in MRC-165, is now fully complete. All liquidation LTVs have been set to 0, remaining borrow positions have been liquidated, and every last bit of user funds, held in credit accounts or in Mars v1, has been safely returned directly to your wallets. Funds held in Amber will follow in the coming days and will be communicated via Am…
Mars Protocol News & Announcements pinned «Martians, the proposal to wind down Mars Protocol has now moved to the on-chain governance stage. Following the publication and forum discussion of [MRC-165] Proposal to Wind Down Mars Protocol, the formal proposal has been submitted to DAO DAO. If approved…»
Martians, the proposal to wind down Mars Protocol has now moved to the on-chain governance stage. Following the publication and forum discussion of [MRC-165] Proposal to Wind Down Mars Protocol, the formal proposal has been submitted to DAO DAO. If approved, execution will begin on February 24, initiating the structured wind-down process: • Gradual ~3% daily reduction of liquidation LTVs • Progressive deleveraging…
Martians, today we published [MRC-165] Proposal to Wind Down Mars Protocol on the governance forum. After evaluating the current state of the protocol, including long-term sustainability, operational overhead, governance complexity, and growth prospects, contributors believe continuing normal operations is no longer in the best interest of users. The focus now is a responsible and orderly exit. The proposal outline…
We will continue to communicate clearly as execution proceeds. Mars Protocol Foundation https://vxtwitter.com/mars_protocol/status/2014050834108108885 Neutron Foundation Relief Plan For Affected Mars Users: https://x.com/neutron_org/status/2014048218598838459
Update on Mars Wind-Down, Amber Continuity, and User Remediation Dear Mars Protocol Community, The exploit was a turning point none of us wanted — not the community, not integrators, and not the contributors who have spent years building Mars. We have read the feedback, we see the anger, and we understand it. Many of us believed Mars still had a future roadmap ahead. After this exploit, that future is no longer po…
https://vxtwitter.com/mars_protocol/status/2010416903244673405
🛰 Heads-up on upcoming USDC market migration Ahead of the upcoming USDC market migration and haircut execution, we want to clarify what this means for borrowers. As part of the mitigation measures introduced earlier, the maximum borrow LTV was reduced (from 92% to 60%) to limit new borrowing ahead of the haircut. This was done to prevent accounts from increasing exposure beyond the forecasted haircut. The liquidati…
🛰 [MRC-164] Update on Exploit Response and Action Plan - On-Chain Proposal We’ve submitted an on-chain governance proposal outlining the final steps to resolve the USDC market shortfall following the recent exploit. What this proposal does: • Executes a DAO treasury transfer of USDC to the Mars Protocol Foundation to repay USDC bad debt • Confirms a final USDC market adjustment of 27.5%, after applying Safety Fund,…
https://vxtwitter.com/mars_protocol/status/2004118342131478707
https://vxtwitter.com/mars_protocol/status/2001937280131387651
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @martiannews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@RealityMeta · 42,297
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mars Protocol News & Announcements” (@martiannews), 1,460 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/martiannews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.