Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

old marsuella

@marsuellneta

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002361117749
TypeChannel
Username@marsuellneta
Description[выражение чувств через посты]⚠️ лс: @maanisk life: https://t.me/mankaeyp
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 19 November 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/marsuellneta

Growth

1912 Aug 2026, 03:02 — 19 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 03:15 — 19 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 03:0212 Aug 2026, 03:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:1519no change
12 Aug 2026, 03:0219first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 19 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
129
Videos
13
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔4527.6%
custom 54519542749153372173119.0%
custom 54541147035947679392314.1%
2314.1%
💘2314.1%
💋116.75%
custom 539810304724515266374.29%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2024 to 1 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Nov 2024, 14:09 UTCviews —

old marsuella pinned «я приняла для себя решение, думаю так будет лучше для меня в первую очередь🙏🏻 спасибо, что были со мной на протяжении месяца, в этот канал вложены мои переживания, каждый пост сделан как способ выразить свое настроение. я очень ценю вашу поддержку, дорожу…»

25 Nov 2024, 13:29 UTC347 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

я приняла для себя решение, думаю так будет лучше для меня в первую очередь🙏🏻 спасибо, что были со мной на протяжении месяца, в этот канал вложены мои переживания, каждый пост сделан как способ выразить свое настроение. я очень ценю вашу поддержку, дорожу каждым, кому нравится моё творчество 🌟 если вам интересно следить за мной (только честно, мёртвая аудитория мне не нужна) – @avzaxl;)

💔24💋42💘1

Signed маня

24 Nov 2024, 19:45 UTC314 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

добрый вечер, знаете, мне опять не нравится то, что я делаю, свои эдиты и канал в целом😭 я знаю, что некоторых раздражают новые каналы, но сейчас я вновь думаю об этом. не могу сказать, так это будет или нет, но буду очень благодарна, если вы напишите свое мнение в комментариях и ответ на вопрос "хотели бы вы перейти на новый канал?" да мысли не просто так, я всегда хотела и хочу быть на шаг лучше, чем могу, но в пос

💔216💋1

Signed маня

24 Nov 2024, 18:19 UTC229 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

will you still love me? [ты будешь меня любить?] #video #sdt std- мане 🤍🐈

5

Signed маня

24 Nov 2024, 17:39 UTC213 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

˗ˏˋИНТЕРВЬЮ С МАНЕЙ!ˎˊ˗ ➜мне было интересно узнать о ней) :・゚ лично от себя могу сказать что она представилась мне очень общительной,грамотной и комфортной! ●спасибо тебе) ★Интервью в комм👇☕★ #интервью

3

Signed маня

23 Nov 2024, 20:36 UTC244 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

☆`извините за отсутствие постов, планирую сесть за транзишн, вейт;) rc /#color #valieva /

💘16custom 545195427491533721775💋5custom 54541147035947679391

Signed маня

20 Nov 2024, 14:25 UTC358 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

☆`спроси у друзей, с кем из "детдомовских" (группа общения) у тебя схожий вайб - 1 part! /#piclist /

custom 545195427491533721724custom 54541147035947679398custom 53981030472451526637💘2💋1

Signed маня

19 Nov 2024, 09:23 UTC283 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

☆`хеппи берздэй rc /#color #medvedeva /

custom 545411470359476793914💘42

Signed маня

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @marsuellneta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 981,855 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“old marsuella” (@marsuellneta), 19 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marsuellneta.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.