Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mingers.

Channel

Mingers.

@markusmingers

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,453subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001272628697
TypeChannel
Username@markusmingers
Created2 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/markusmingers

Growth

4,4534,4604,456.56 August 2026 — 4,459 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,459 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,460 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,454 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,453 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,452–4,461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:264,453-1
9 Aug 2026, 12:014,454-6
6 Aug 2026, 14:014,460+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:354,459no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:514,459first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 4,453 subscribers
Avg views / post
684
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.853%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 January 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,367
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

434 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍26059.9%
👎6515.0%
💯439.91%
419.45%
🙈61.38%
😁51.15%
🐳30.691%
🔥20.461%
😢20.461%
🤔20.461%
🤡20.461%
🍌10.23%
🤮10.23%
🤯10.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 434reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC469 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/nl9Rid1P4XQ?is=mk-0oB-8B5x1CkpX

4

28 Jun 2026, 12:12 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Heute ist es soweit. Nach langer Zeit gibt es wieder eine neue YouTube-Doku. Dieses Video ist persönlicher als alles, was ich bisher veröffentlicht habe. Ich spreche offen über meine Insolvenz, meinen Klinikaufenthalt, meinen Weg zurück – und verrate außerdem erstmals, dass ich im November auf einer Bodybuilding-Bühne stehen werde. Keine Show. Keine Fassade. Einfach die Geschichte, wie sie wirklich war. Wenn euch

30 Jan 2026, 18:24 UTC≈2,930 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍132

30 Jan 2026, 07:03 UTC≈2,700 views94 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

„Dänemark geht einen radikalen Schritt: Social Media erst ab 15. Schutz für Kinder – oder zu viel staatlicher Eingriff? Wo ziehst du die Grenze zwischen Medienkompetenz, Elternverantwortung und Regulierung?“

👎50👍42🤮1🤯1

28 Jan 2026, 18:05 UTC≈2,150 views80 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🟧 MEINE MEINUNG Die CDU spielt mit dem Gedanken, das Recht auf Teilzeit einzuschränken. Das ist kein Reformprojekt, das ist ein Rückschritt. Teilzeit ist kein Lifestyle-Gimmick, sondern für Millionen Menschen die einzige Möglichkeit, Familie, Pflege und Arbeit überhaupt zu vereinbaren. Wer daran rüttelt, trifft nicht „Bequemlichkeit“, sondern Existenzmodelle. Die Annahme, weniger Teilzeit würde mehr Leistung bring

👍782

25 Jan 2026, 15:21 UTC≈2,130 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Positive Gesetze. Klare Entscheidungen. Wirkung. Man vergisst es im täglichen Lärm schnell: Staaten können handeln – und tun es auch. Nicht perfekt, nicht überall, aber konkret. Ein paar Beispiele aus jüngerer Zeit: • In Schweden ist es verboten, Hunde länger als sechs Stunden allein zu lassen – aus Tierschutz, nicht aus Symbolik. • Spanien führt als erstes europäisches Land bezahlten Menstruationsurlaub

14

17 Jan 2026, 18:13 UTC≈1,970 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

In diesem Land ist nicht alles gleich schlimm. Manches ist nur ein bisschen schlimm. Und manches offenbar unverzeihlich. Wer andere in Gefahr bringt, kommt günstig davon. Wer sein Auto im Winter kurz laufen lässt, zahlt ordentlich. Schnee auf dem Dach? Sicht eingeschränkt? Kennzeichen kaum erkennbar? Alles irgendwie regelwidrig. Aber nicht wirklich dramatisch. Das eigentliche Kapitalverbrechen ist offenbar: kalte

👍291🤡1

17 Jan 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,600 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Homeoffice. Raucherpausen. Spülmaschine ausräumen. Kind betreuen. Und die große Frage: persönliche Freiheit oder Arbeitszeitbetrug? Die Rechtslage ist klarer, als viele denken: Arbeitszeit ist Arbeitszeit. Wer vorgibt zu arbeiten, es aber nicht tut, täuscht den Arbeitgeber – und riskiert Abmahnung, fristlose Kündigung und im Extremfall sogar ein Strafverfahren. Raucherpausen? Nur im Rahmen der gesetzlichen Pausen.

1

12 Jan 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,760 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚠️ Glatteis in ganz Deutschland – was nach einem Verkehrsunfall jetzt wirklich zählt Aktuell kommt es bundesweit zu massivem Glatteis. Entsprechend häufen sich Auffahrunfälle, Abkommen von der Fahrbahn und Blechschäden. Entscheidend ist nicht nur, was passiert ist, sondern wie ihr euch danach verhaltet. 👉 Die wichtigsten Tipps aus der Praxis: 1. Ruhe bewahren & absichern Warnblinker an, Warnweste an, Warndreieck a

👍131

11 Jan 2026, 18:42 UTC≈1,330 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Wir suchen Rechtsanwaltsfachangestellte (m/w/d) Sie sind Rechtsanwaltsfachangestellte und möchten in einer modernen Kanzlei arbeiten, in der Struktur, Wertschätzung und Verlässlichkeit zählen? Dann passen Sie zu uns. Darauf können Sie sich freuen: • Homeoffice bis zu zwei Tage pro Woche (inkl. Top-Equipment) • Überdurchschnittliches Gehalt (32.000 – 60.000 € je nach Erfahrung) • 40-Stunden-Woche mit

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @markusmingers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 338,528 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mingers.” (@markusmingers), 4,453 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/markusmingers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.