Channel
@markpishet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001295145774 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @markpishet |
| Description | Против всех, за каждого Жалобы и предложения — @markkotorogonet |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/markpishet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 24 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 24 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 19 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2021 to 25 April 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Один день Нашел запись новостной программы от 15 декабря 1991 года. СССР рассыпается, в Осетии и Югославии война, Приднестровье рвется из Молдовы, в Москву прилетает гос секретарь США, Кыргызстан празднует день независимости, Курилы обращаются в ООН с просьбой оставить их в России, в национальной галерее Лондона ирландские сепаратисты взорвали бомбу. И вишенка на торте — первое «интервью» Бродского на советском теле…
Василий Верещагин, «Апофеоз войны», 1871 год. Надпись на оригинальной раме: «Посвящается всем великим завоевателям — прошедшим, настоящим и будущим».
Токаев vs. Смагулов Охуеть! t.me/orda_kz/14526
Опять не Тасмагамбетов! t.me/vlastkz/9556
Наш 93-й год? t.me/orda_kz/14501
Официальное сообщение от комендатуры Алматы: Уважаемые алматинцы! К сожалению, радикально настроенные сторонники беспорядков нанесли огромный ущерб городу, оказали сопротивление законным действиям правоохранительных органов по наведению порядка и обеспечению безопасности. Экстремисты совершают мародерские действия, нанося ущерб бизнесу. Более того, ставят под угрозу жизни и здоровье мирных горожан, препятствуя рабо…
Господин президент! В стране идут митинги, а вы делаете официальное заявление через Твиттер. Но это еще ладно. Неужели у вас, человека с опытом работы в ООН, нет важнейших двух вещей для публичной персоны: умения грамотно излагать свои мысли и нормального копирайтера? Это же пиздец, а не заявление!
Как я понимаю, грядущий альбом Оксимирона будет называться «Ренессанс» или «Возрождение», а этим микстейпом он закрывает сложный и неоднозначный для себя период. Смягчит ли этот релиз груз завышенных ожиданий, и сможет ли сам альбом их хоть как-то оправдать — узнаем в ближайшее время.
👍1
В связи с проведением в Целинном фестиваля «Казахской новой волны», спешу напомнить, что фильмы это самой волны — худшее направление во всем мировом кино, которое мне, к сожалению, приходилось смотреть. Говорю как человек, который поступал (и поступил, но ушел) на факультет Кино в национальную академию искусств, где представители новой волны и преподавали. Не ходите на фестиваль. Не совершайте ошибку. instagram.com…
Телеграм становится мессенджером, которого мы не достойны.
Обсуждают они, имеют ли гомофобы право на гомофобию или это фашизм. Из чего вытекает дискуссия о том, кто имеет право на фашизм.
Националист-либертарианец комментирует срач лгбт-активиста и нарко-(тоже активистки?). Просто еще один день в русскоязычном твиттере. twitter.com/mpojarsky/status/1432988016243523586
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @markpishet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,078,681 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Марк пишет” (@markpishet), 24 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/markpishet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.