Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,166–1,203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 01:40
1,170
-7
14 Sept 2026, 12:41
1,177
-2
11 Sept 2026, 05:55
1,179
-4
2 Sept 2026, 07:06
1,183
-3
30 Aug 2026, 03:59
1,186
+1
26 Aug 2026, 22:44
1,185
-1
23 Aug 2026, 23:33
1,186
-1
20 Aug 2026, 01:23
1,187
-4
17 Aug 2026, 09:58
1,191
-3
13 Aug 2026, 15:18
1,194
-2
10 Aug 2026, 14:07
1,196
-3
7 Aug 2026, 23:17
1,199
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:43
1,199
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
245 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
92
37.6%
custom 5235478122081560535
54
22.0%
🔥
48
19.6%
custom 5235728802142759605
45
18.4%
custom 5235807206770750407
6
2.45%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 245 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marketing_smm_telegram. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 March 2026 to 8 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я полностью ушла в свой аргентинский блог 🚶♀️➡️
старых клиентов не бросаю, но новых уже не беру :)
За прошлый месяц сделала 10 коммерческих коллабораций, и такая работа мне приносит намного больше удовольствия.
Продолжаю учить испансикй язык.
Купили квартиру в Аргентину.
Зарегала патент на свои торговые марки.
В общем, шаг за шагом иду к своим мечтам 💫
Вчера глянула статистику: огромное количество каналов «умерли» после апрельских событий😱
При чем аудитория ведь не перестала быть активной или платежеспособной.
Просто сами авторы каналов пропали.
Я почти полностью ушла в инст лайф блог:) только на прошлой неделе сделала 5 коммерческих коллабораций.
И на самом деле я рада, что решила все накопленные знания в области маркетинга направить в себя.
Такой формат мне подходит больше и я каждый день кайфую от того, что делаю 🙏🏼
Но старых клиентов я всё так же веду, продвигаю 💫👍🏼
Стало чуть сложнее, так как часть аудитории из ТГ ушла на другие площадки.
Мы купили квартиру в Буэнос-Айресе 🏠🤩
Месяц выдался насыщенным!
Купили квартиру в столице Аргентины, сейчас делаем ремонт 🧑🔧 Меняем абсолютно всё.
Кстати, квартиры тут продают без мебели и часто даже лампочки 💡 выкручивают.
В инсте достигла новую цель: 150.000.
Больше уже ушла в работу как инфлюенсер, делаю контент для аргентинских брендов плюс как креатор работаю с Shein.
Но пока этот тг канал веду, парочку кли…
Как расти в Телеге в 2026 году?
Многие говорят, что в Телеграм заходить уже поздно и дорого.
Но на самом деле всё реально, если знать, как сюда приводить подписчиков.
Делюсь тем, что будет работать в 2026 году:
1. Реклама в других каналах (закупы)
Это всё еще самый быстрый и понятный способ вырасти.
Но есть один нюанс: подписчик дорожает с каждым месяцем.
В 2022 году мы радовались подписчику по 50 рублей.
Сейчас…
Как сделать красивую кнопку под постом?
Видели посты, под которыми висят прозрачные кнопки: «Записаться», «Перейти на сайт» или «Читать подробнее»?
(Как здесь, например)
В обычном меню Телеграма такой функции нет. Но сделать это проще, чем кажется.
Делюсь инструментом, которым пользуются все админы.
🤖 Нам понадобится бот: @ControllerBot
Инструкция по шагам:
1️⃣ Настройка (делается 1 раз):
Запускаем бота, жмем /…
Как экономить время на соцсетях
Каждый день я веду 7 площадок:
делаю Reels в Instagram (137.000 подписчиков), TikTok (47.000), Threads (13.500) и веду 3 Telegram-канала.
Что помогает:
1. Приватный канал идей.
Все мысли и темы кидаю в свой приватный Тг канал.
Все идея всегда под рукой.
2. Съёмка партиями по выходным.
В выходные снимаю много коротких видео общий/средний/крупный план, разный. В будни быстро собираю…
🔥5❤3custom 52354781220815605351
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @marketing_smm_telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ваши ставки, будет работать Телега с 1.03? (с впн имею ввиду)
Да83%
Нет17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 8 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@marketing_smm_telegram named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@argentina_hola named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Оля | Продвижение Телеграм” (@marketing_smm_telegram), 1,170 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marketing_smm_telegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.