Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SEO • Николай Романцов | кейсы, заметки и жизнь

Channel

SEO • Николай Романцов | кейсы, заметки и жизнь

@marketing_nikolay

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,567subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001643853593
TypeChannel
Username@marketing_nikolay
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/marketing_nikolay

Growth

5,5675,5845,575.57 August 2026 — 5,584 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,584 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,580 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,568 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,567 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,564–5,587 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 12:355,567-1
11 Aug 2026, 21:335,568-12
8 Aug 2026, 11:455,580-4
7 Aug 2026, 12:015,584no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:515,584first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 9 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

625 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍27443.8%
🔥17828.5%
😁629.92%
548.64%
💯284.48%
🤝213.36%
🙏60.96%
👏10.16%
👨‍💻10.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 625reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
109
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 17 we hold a reading for · 41%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marketing_nikolay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 February 2026 to 22 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTC≈1,500 views40 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мини трюк по креативам для РСЯ Очень часто я слышу фразу «Сделайте красиво, Николай, мы Вам верим» — и с одной стороны мне приятно за доверие, с другой стороны у меня нет навыков дизайнера и их визуального мышления) Да и зачастую у всех представление о «красивом» совершенно разные, сложно угадать их ожидания, да и сразу визуально представить А если мы идем еще в ux копирайтинг, то это вообще можно на один креатив в

🔥22👍13🤝2😁21

27 May 2026, 08:31 UTC≈2,670 views76 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Неудачное сотрудничество с компанией и их вопросы: • сделайте так, чтобы когда человек гуглит наших конкурентов, у него на мониторе сразу открывался наш сайт и блокировался компьютер • мы тут добавили 57 правок к договору. Наш юрист готов убрать пункт про залог вашей квартиры, если сделаете скидку • к договору на 500 рублей служба безопасности запросила весь пакет документов и фото в полный рост (белый верх, ч

👍40😁21💯103🔥2

21 May 2026, 07:38 UTC≈2,090 views51 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

На старте карьеры процесс работы с клиентами был понятен: главное не выгореть ты даёшь пользу для бизнеса — у тебя будут клиенты Но с каждым годом открываю для себя всё новые нюансы работы с компаниями История: Помог небольшой региональной компании по септикам Пошли заявки SEO, Директ, Авито Владелец забухал и удалил сайт Я обычно не созваниваюсь с клиентами, решаем вопросы в рамках переписки. Созвоны практикую при

😁27👍117💯5🔥1

8 May 2026, 08:29 UTC≈2,480 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кто тестировал в директе, как Вам результаты?

👍6

6 May 2026, 10:29 UTC≈2,550 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Результат у тех, кто пробует, а не рассуждает Пришло много заявок на ПФ Ситуация как в авито: спрашивают цену и игнор Таких заявок много Но ещё больше тех, кто находится в рассуждениях и теоретических вопросах Теоретические вопросы не считаю чем-то неправильным Просто вижу тенденцию, когда люди сами себя загоняют в угол рассуждениями, а что будет, если.. Почему бы не попробовать? Это как с некоторыми компаниями

👍13💯6🔥5

29 Apr 2026, 10:22 UTC≈2,720 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Накрутка поведенческих факторов Мне часто на консультациях задают один и те же вопросы про работу с поведенческими факторами (ПФ). Тема стала так известна, что зачастую я даже не успеваю предложить накрутку, как уже слышу вопросы про нее) Поэтому отвечу на самые часто задаваемые вопросы и буду ссылаться на этот пост, может кому поможет: 1) Что такое накрутка поведенческих факторов? Боты ищут нужный запрос в поиск

👍14🔥6🤝31😁1

28 Apr 2026, 09:44 UTC≈1,950 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

видео на YouTube • ВК Видео • RuTube для тех, кто просил более развёрнутый ответ как создавать рейтинги

👍12🔥4😁1

27 Apr 2026, 11:44 UTC≈2,060 views35 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍23💯7🔥3🤝1😁1

27 Apr 2026, 11:44 UTC≈2,030 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Просто мои мысли по поводу ситуации на рынке услуг

👍7

25 Mar 2026, 08:04 UTC≈3,510 views58 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Наконец-то улеглись споры по поводу GEO оптимизации Люди разделились на два лагеря: 1) SEO умерло, теперь работает только GEO 2) GEO — это одно из ответвлений оптимизации сайта под алгоритмы ранжирования Я хочу показать небольшой трюк, который поможет двум этим лагерям Во многих нишах есть запрос по типу "Топ свадебных салонов Москвы", "Где отремонтировать Jeep в Москве", "лучшие компании по __", "Где можно __ в М

👍23🔥1413😁6👨‍💻1🤝1

16 Mar 2026, 09:19 UTC≈2,870 views37 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Дополнение к посту про инструменты Видимо новый инструмент также буду часто использовать в этих связках https://direct-mcp.aatex.ru Суть: За 10 минут можно создать через нейронку основу рекламных кампаний с большим количеством групп Не просто тексты/заголовки, а именно полноценную кампанию, которую также можно запустить полностью из диалога с нейросетью Да, их нужно дорабатывать 100%, заголовки там слабые, но оче

🔥21👍7🤝63

11 Mar 2026, 07:10 UTC≈2,900 views73 reactions100 Starsread 12 August 2026

Пока в SEO не так много нового, хочу собрать список инструментов/сервисов на разные бюджеты Тариф «минимальные траты» — Техничка: Screaming Frog SEO Spider — Сбор данных и тексты: Подписки на Arsenkin Tools и Content-watch — Семантика: Старый добрый Яндекс.Wordstat — Плагины: Любое браузерное расширение (мое или Alaev SEO Tools) Базовые работы можно производить, но, конечно, это прям минималка Суммарно траты

👍41🔥18🙏65😁2🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @marketing_nikolay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 642,388 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SEO • Николай Романцов | кейсы, заметки и жизнь” (@marketing_nikolay), 5,567 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marketing_nikolay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.