4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,980–2,988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 11:28
2,984
+3
10 Aug 2026, 06:17
2,981
-4
6 Aug 2026, 19:43
2,985
-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:46
2,987
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 7 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.5%
avg views ÷ 2,984 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,090
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.642%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held
14 (7 May 2025 – 22 July 2026)
Views total
1,090
Reactions total
7
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
114 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
72
63.2%
👍
12
10.5%
😢
9
7.89%
😁
8
7.02%
🤩
7
6.14%
🔥
6
5.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Привіт
Якщо для оптимізації роботи часто пишете листи через Ші, то ловіть корисну статтю (можна одразу запихнути у ші з правилом не використовуй ці ред-флаги коли пишеш для мене:))
14 Red Flags That Make Your Writing Sound Like AI (+How to Fix It)
Зберегти:)
🚀 VACANCY: MARKETING OPERATIONS MANAER/ Marketing Team Lead
Media Miami
📍 Локація: Remote або Hybrid
💰 ЗП: від 2 000 USD+
Media Miami шукає Marketing Operations Manager / Marketing Team Lead, який(а) координуватиме маркетингові процеси та забезпечуватиме ефективне виконання проєктів у напрямах newsletters, paid media, social media та growth marketing.
🎯 Ваші задачі:
• Керувати маркетинговими проєктами від ідеї до…
🚀VACANCY. SENIOR EMAIL MARKETING MANAGER. MEDIA MIAMI
📍 Локація: Remote або Warsaw
💼 Тип зайнятості: Full-time
💰 ЗП: від 2 000 USD+
Media Miami шукає Senior Email Marketing Manager, який(а) відповідатиме за розвиток і масштабування портфеля високонавантажених email-розсилок.
Якщо для вас email-маркетинг — це інструмент зростання та генерації прибутку, а не просто канал комунікації, ця роль саме для вас.
🎯 Ваші за…
🚀 VACANCY. SENIOR SMS MARKETING MANAGER
Media Miami
📍 Локація: Remote або Warsaw
💼 Тип зайнятості: Full-time
💰 ЗП: від 2 000 USD-до найму найкращого спеціаліста
Media Miami шукає Senior SMS Manager, який(а) побудує та масштабуватиме SMS-напрямок з нуля.
🎯 Ваші задачі:
• Запуск і повне управління SMS-каналом
• Залучення та розвиток бази підписників
• Побудова стратегії монетизації та SMS-реклами
• Забезпечення вис…
Привіт
Новини світу..ну як світу, так одна про США, але я думаю цікава.
Тепер в США можна буде поміняти свою адресу gmail і не стидатися пошти "цукерочка" яку робив у школі і не знав що будеш користуватися нею все життя😆
Google тепер дозволяє користувачам у США змінювати свою адресу Gmail
Прямо зараз
вебінар: Контрольоване використання складних HTML структур в редакторі Stripo/eSputnik та написання своїх компонентів
https://www.youtube.com/live/-TBXDta81vM
плюс ви можете задавати будь які питання і якщо Дмитро знає на них відповідь, то ви отримаєте це прям під час вебінару
Дуже рекомендую
Привіт, знаю, що ніхто не сумував, але ж скоро 14 лютого, хто знає може мені тут за мої періодичні появи хоч серденьок під новиною поставлять. Не зрада, але дуже приємно😁
Ловіть цікавеньке короч
✅Як маркетологи можуть впливати на AI-зведення в Gmail та Apple Mail
Читати
✅The Complete Email Deliverability Checklist for 2026 (+Tools & Tips)
Читати
✅Email Design Trends for 2026 (хоча тренд то бренд-кіт компанії😂)
Чи…
Зараз Gmail робить масштабне оновлення. Що email маркетологи мають з цим робити?
📊 Вкладка "Промо" тепер працює не хронологічно
✅ Gmail більше не сортує листи у вкладці "Промоакції" за часом відправлення. Тепер він виводить нагору ті, які вважає найбільш релевантними для конкретного користувача, ґрунтуючись на його історії взаємодії. Чим точніше лист відповідає інтересам, тим вище шанс обійти конкурентів.
👉 Що це оз…
Якщо ви досі думаєте, що інтерактивні листи - це щось зі світу «коду і магії», - вас просто дурили.
Дмитро Кудренко (CEO Stripo) поділився секретною “лабораторією” - Showcase Stripo.
👀50+ інтерактивних email-механік, які раніше бачили тільки на конференціях і в демках,
тепер доступні кожному.
Тут усе чесно й без маркетингових казочок:
— дивитесь інтерактиви просто в браузері
— надсилаєте собі лист, щоб потестити
—…
📊 Свіженьке про Email-маркетинг 2025
Щоб зрозуміти, як змінюється ефективність email-кампаній, Validity/Litmus проаналізували ринок США та Європи у 2025 році. Дослідження охопило сотні маркетологів і компаній із різних галузей.
✍️ ROI
35% компаній отримують $10–36 за $1
30% — $36–50 за $1
5% — понад $50 за $1
21% взагалі не вимірюють ROI.
✍️ Використання AI
49% маркетологів застосовують generative AI для текстів.
…
7 порад, як ефективно використовувати AI в email-маркетингу
1️⃣Навчай AI своїми даними – підвантажуй попередні теми листів, сегменти, результати, щоб алгоритми краще відчували голос бренду.
2️⃣Став чіткі цілі – відкриття, кліки, реактивація неактивних підписників: чим ясніше завдання, тим точніші рекомендації.
3️⃣Бери AI-результат за основу, а не за готовий варіант – редагуй теми й тексти, додавай “людський” штрих…
👍8❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @marketing_email. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2025 to 22 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Email Marketing” (@marketing_email), 2,984 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marketing_email.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.