JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Senate Republicans reveal new cryptocurrency tax bill. PulsarTrades

Channel
PulsarTrades
@market_pulsar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39,491subscribers
+2,342 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002653388426 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @market_pulsar |
| Description | A high-frequency look at market dynamics, asset spikes, and financial signals that matter. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/market_pulsar |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:15 | 39,491 | +1,215 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 38,276 | +321 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 37,955 | +127 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 37,828 | +114 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 37,714 | +256 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 37,458 | +55 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 37,403 | -42 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 37,445 | -44 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 37,489 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:04 | 37,501 | -43 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 37,544 | -80 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 37,624 | -59 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 37,683 | -21 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 37,704 | -57 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 37,761 | -53 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 37,814 | +27 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 37,787 | -37 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 37,824 | -32 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 37,856 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 37,865 | first reading |
Engagement
511 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.4%
- avg views ÷ 39,491 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,650
- 283 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.467%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 283
- of 511 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 278 of 283 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 511 (5 August 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,164,378 |
| Reactions total | 10,091 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 18:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,270
- Videos
- ≈344
- Links
- ≈4,750
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 37s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,769 reactions across 505 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 4.68% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 832 | 4.68% | |
| 🤗 | 525 | 2.95% | |
| 🔥 | 506 | 2.85% | |
| 😘 | 502 | 2.83% | |
| 😎 | 492 | 2.77% | |
| 👌 | 490 | 2.76% | |
| 🥰 | 478 | 2.69% | |
| 🦄 | 475 | 2.67% | |
| 🤝 | 467 | 2.63% | |
| 🎉 | 466 | 2.62% | |
| 🌭 | 463 | 2.61% | |
| 🎄 | 460 | 2.59% | |
| 🤓 | 460 | 2.59% | |
| 🎃 | 458 | 2.58% | |
| 👏 | 443 | 2.49% | |
| 🤷 | 443 | 2.49% | |
| 🤩 | 441 | 2.48% | |
| 🍾 | 431 | 2.43% | |
| 🐳 | 431 | 2.43% | |
| 🍓 | 429 | 2.41% | |
| 34 further kinds | 8,077 | 45.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 506 of the 511 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,769 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 511 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.17%
- 6 of 511 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 3,290
- over 6 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 7,300
- over 505 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 511 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 SEC Chair Paul Atkins says the agency is developing clearer regulations for crypto and digital financial innovation. PulsarTrades
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 $META allegedly named Mark Zuckerberg as a "researcher" to obtain a $355 million tax benefit linked to his $4 billion compensation, the NYT reports. The IRS is now seeking to recover the contested $355 million in tax savings. PulsarTrades
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 The Federal Reserve is now anticipated to hold interest rates steady at the upcoming FOMC meeting. PulsarTrades
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 The U.S. Senate is preparing to vote on a proposed bill that would ban members of Congress and their immediate families from trading stocks. The measure wouldn’t force lawmakers to divest current assets, but it would block all future trades. PulsarTrades
😴1
JUST IN: Major financial players unveil a new crypto stablecoin: Open USD $OUSD Backed by: • Visa • Stripe • Shopify • Coinbase • Mastercard $OUSD goes live across Solana, Base, Ethereum, and Tempo with $1 billion in initial liquidity. PulsarTrades
🐳1
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 The U.S. Treasury is set to conduct another bond buyback tomorrow, focusing on up to $6 billion in longer-term debt. PulsarTrades
😈2🌭1🤔1🦄1
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Morgan Stanley has launched its "Digital Asset Lab" to research and test cryptocurrency infrastructure, with the goal of integrating it into traditional financial systems. PulsarTrades
🍓1🙉1
JUST IN: Bitcoin hits $85,000 PulsarTrades
🙏7
🚨 CRYPTO ISN’T SLEEPING. WHY SHOULD YOU? 🔥 Welcome to ByteRiot – your 24/7 intel source in the world of digital finance. 📡 What you get inside: 📊 Bitcoin & Ethereum market updates 🧠 Smart investment strategies 🚀 Altcoin watchlists with breakout potential 🔎 Exclusive DeFi & NFT alpha 📈 Real-time trading signals 📰 Hand-picked crypto news (no noise, just value) 🌍 Deep dives into blockchain trends & tech 💼 Finan…
👍1😁1
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump calls on Americans to place their trust in AI companies to self-regulate. PulsarTrades
😎5
JUST IN: Tom Lee declares that crypto has entered a "bull market." PulsarTrades
🤣3🙏2🎄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 511 posts we hold for @market_pulsar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@simplylogo · 43,2665 postsDeep Dive Crypto: Insights & Market Pulse
@AirdropNexia · 60,0344 postsCrypto coin 🪙
@crypt_con · 48,4224 postsCryptoSummit
@peaks_crypto · 39,9124 postsByteRiot
@wr_bycr · 47,6193 postsCrypto Insights Hub
@majale_digital · 44,8052 postsTrendCascade
@flow_wowcr · 39,4091 postCrypto Idea
@interst_cr · 46,5371 postPeakScope
@peaks_new · 47,0211 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@crypt_con · 48,4225 postsCrypto Insights Hub
@majale_digital · 44,8055 postsCryptoSummit
@peaks_crypto · 39,9125 postsByteRiot
@wr_bycr · 47,6195 postsPeakScope
@peaks_new · 47,0214 postsDeep Dive Crypto: Insights & Market Pulse
@AirdropNexia · 60,0342 postsTrendCascade
@flow_wowcr · 39,4092 postsTrend
@frontluxe · 39,8132 postsCrypto Idea
@interst_cr · 46,5372 postsBitcoin Price
@bitcoin_price · 56,5551 postSimplyLogo
@simplylogo · 43,2661 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PulsarTrades” (@market_pulsar), 39,491 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/market_pulsar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.