Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PulsarTrades

Channel

PulsarTrades

@market_pulsar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

37,809subscribers

+660 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002653388426
TypeChannel
Username@market_pulsar
DescriptionA high-frequency look at market dynamics, asset spikes, and financial signals that matter.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/market_pulsar

Growth

37,14937,80937,4797 August 2026 — 37,149 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,227 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,319 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,389 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,494 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,552 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,591 subscribers14 August 2026 — 37,703 subscribers15 August 2026 — 37,809 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +660. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,050–37,908 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 15:5337,809+106
14 Aug 2026, 06:3637,703+112
12 Aug 2026, 22:2337,591+39
12 Aug 2026, 01:4237,552+58
11 Aug 2026, 01:0237,494+105
10 Aug 2026, 03:5737,389+70
9 Aug 2026, 04:1137,319+92
8 Aug 2026, 02:3637,227+78
7 Aug 2026, 16:3337,149first reading

Engagement

72 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 37,809 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,990
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.446%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 72 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held72 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total718,970
Reactions total3,206
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,080
Videos
334
Links
4,220

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,206 reactions across 72 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 4.49% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1444.49%
🤝1223.81%
🍓1193.71%
🌭1013.15%
👌1003.12%
🤷973.03%
🦄952.96%
🤗942.93%
😇932.90%
🍾912.84%
💯912.84%
🙏902.81%
🎉862.68%
842.62%
🤓842.62%
🤩842.62%
🎃822.56%
🔥792.46%
😎772.40%
🏆732.28%
34 further kinds1,32041.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,206reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.39%
1 of 72 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
6,190
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
10,300
over 71 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 23:53 UTC≈2,670 views10 reactionsread 16 August 2026

JUST IN: Elon Musk says, "I hope AI is kind to us." PulsarTrades

👍3🎃211🍾1👎1🙊1

15 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC≈3,010 views13 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: Billionaire Mark Cuban claims computer chips "will be the new crypto." PulsarTrades

2🍓2🤷2😐2👏1💋1💔1😁1

15 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈5,370 views29 reactionsread 16 August 2026

FUN FACT: Less than 10% of people worldwide own cryptocurrency. PulsarTrades

👍8🍓54👎3🤣2😭2🐳1👌1

15 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC≈6,190 views41 reactionsread 16 August 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

🏔 PeakScope: Where Crypto Meets Clarity Tired of hype and hopium? PeakScope gives you the real tools to build crypto-powered income: 💰 Passive income gems 📊 Trading signals & analysis 📈 DeFi & altcoin opportunities 🧠 Investment strategies that actually work 📰 Daily curated crypto insights 🎯 Focused on financial freedom through smart moves No noise. Just sharp signals and clear direction. Get ahead of the next m

🤝105🍾5🤓5🍓4🔥4🍌3🤗2

15 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC≈11,000 views39 reactionsread 16 August 2026

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇨🇳 U.S. officials are reportedly urging Apple $AAPL to stop buying memory chips from China. PulsarTrades

🌭85🎃4🐳4🙏43👍3😡3

14 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC≈10,200 views52 reactionsread 16 August 2026

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 The Trump family's cryptocurrency venture, World Liberty Financial, has received approval to operate as a federally chartered bank. PulsarTrades

🔥9🍾7🎉7🙊6😎5😨5🏆4🤣4

14 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈12,300 views63 reactionsread 16 August 2026

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Citi is calling on the U.S. Senate to support the passage of the Crypto Clarity Act. PulsarTrades

🎃10😭10🎄7😡7🙉75🦄5🤩4

13 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC≈16,000 views85 reactionsread 16 August 2026

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 The White House is set to meet with top cryptocurrency executives next week. PulsarTrades

🍌11🍓10🎉9🏆9😘9🤓7🙊76

13 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC≈15,100 views72 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: S&P 500 closes at a record 7,799 — reaching an all-time high 🚀 PulsarTrades

🤩10👎9🤷9😐8🏆7😍75💋5

13 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC≈14,200 views64 reactionsread 16 August 2026

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇨🇳 The U.S. claims over 40 countries—among them Japan, Canada, and Mexico—are helping China bypass American tariffs, violating international trade rules. PulsarTrades

🤗13🍓8👏6🔥6🤷6😨6😴64

13 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈13,200 views70 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: Bitcoin dips once more, slipping below $63,000 PulsarTrades

🎉11🥰9🦄9🌭7😇7😐7🐳5😁5

13 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈12,100 views47 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: 🇨🇭 UBS, Switzerland’s largest bank, has increased its stake in spot Bitcoin ETFs by 230%, bringing its total investment to $90 million. PulsarTrades

😴126😇6🤗5💋4🍓3🙏3🍌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @market_pulsar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 173,832 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PulsarTrades” (@market_pulsar), 37,809 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/market_pulsar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.