Video, posted without a caption
❤1👏1🔥1

Channel
@marina58894
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
55subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003956017588 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marina58894 |
| Description | Пространство, где можно быть собой - без масок и иллюзий. Здесь вы учитесь управлять энергией, понимать себя, трансформироваться ✨Начни знакомство https://t.me/marina58894/ Связь со мной @Marinas49681 Поблагодарить https://pay.cloudtips.ru/p/591416f9 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marina58894 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:22 | 55 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:48 | 55 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 28 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (28 October 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 267 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 37.1% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 28.6% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Video, posted without a caption
❤1👏1🔥1
Новая серия про моих героев Панацею Петровну и Фырку. ❤️❤️❤️
❤1
🗣В ответ на первый вопрос подгрузились слова: жуть, крах, хрясть, жесть и пошли любые матерные слова, слова , сказанные в гневе, с негативной эмоцией , целенаправленные на кого-то... 🗣матерный язык - древний БоеВой язык создан для быстрого, короткого изъяснения и понимания ситуации. Он быстро доходит до человека, оказывая негативное действо- дырявит человеческие поля, пробивает, изрешечивает. Древние, создавая этот…
❤1👍1
Практика "Словокоды" Эти вопросы я смотрела у своих Хроник Акаши✨ 1✨. Какие слова разрушают структуру человека? 2. ✨Когда и зачем был создан матерный язык? Как он работает на самом деле? 3. ✨Как экологично программировать систему человека и какое нужно для этого состояние? 4. ✨Как на самом деле работают словокоды относительно пространства, времени и материи? Почему важно подключать личную волю человека/души? 5. ✨За…
Сегодня у нас был 4 урок- вебинар по Словокодам. Словокоды это язык программирования системы человек с очень чёткой логикой. Нужно понимать ЛоГику ситуации ,те никогда не быть ограниченным списком слов...🕊📣🗣🗣🗣 Урок очень понравился. Смотрели и открывали свои каналы Ясно. Вика загрузила нам Словокоды.
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1❤🔥1👏1
Video, posted without a caption
❤1👏1🔥1
Это начало новой серии про Панацею Петровну и кота Фырку.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1👏1🔥1
Важный нюанс в ритуале
Когда входят в магический эгрегор
Кураторы задали вопрос про про ритуалы. Где контракт, где не контракт :) Денежный кофе и т.д. Сейчас перекину сюда голосовые
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @marina58894. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✨✨ТВОЕ бережное преображение📣 ✨. Марина Спицына -Мастер легкой трансформации.🍀” (@marina58894), 55 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marina58894.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.