Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Marifat Jamal | Fikrlar (Uzbek)

Channel

Marifat Jamal | Fikrlar (Uzbek)

@marifatjamal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,367subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001512995977
TypeChannel
Username@marifatjamal
DescriptionO’zim to’g’ri deb hisoblagan hamma narsa haqida yozaman) Hamkorlik va tavsiyalar uchun👇 https://t.me/Marifat_Jamal_bot
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/marifatjamal

Growth

13,36718 Aug 2026, 07:45 — 13,367 subscribers18 Aug 2026, 07:57 — 13,367 subscribers18 Aug 2026, 07:4518 Aug 2026, 07:57
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,354–13,380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 07:5713,367no change
18 Aug 2026, 07:4513,367first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.3%
avg views ÷ 13,367 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,790
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held19 (17 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total62,300
Reactions total1,789
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
112
Videos
70
Links
123

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

4,265 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,39456.1%
🔥85920.1%
👍2185.11%
👏1844.31%
😁1714.01%
🤩1714.01%
🥰1673.92%
🎉872.04%
😢140.328%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,265reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC≈4,060 views158 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Kecha uyda shunaqa bir gap bo'ldi. Singlim hammaga Westminster yoki MDIST ga ham topshirmoqchiligini aytdi. Tabiiyki, shu payt men jahl bilan "o'zimizda o'qisang tekinga o'qiysan, menam falonchi yili grant uchun saralanganman, chunki qattiq o'qirdim" deb aytdim. Tushunishingiz uchun, kontrakt to'lab o'qitishga sharoitimiz hozirda yetarli. Lekin, ichimdan ko'proq aynan o'zim bir paytlar faqat grant uchun harakat q

72🔥52🎉15👏6🥰5👍4😁2😢2

5 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC≈6,230 views113 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Hayot oxirgi kunlarda 👇 (Post yozishga ulgurmayabman) 👩‍💻💃🏻💡📝📚🎯💰🧑‍🧑‍🧒‍🧒🫂 Sizda qanaqa?)

🤩4934👏14👍7😁6🔥2😢1

3 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈6,980 views230 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

123🔥52👍21🥰17😁8🎉5😢3🤩1

26 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC≈10,100 views272 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Bu rasmlarda mening bir yildan ortiq hayotim aks etgan. Qayta ko’zim yonganligi, rostan nimadan zavqlanishimni topganim, o’zimni ahmoq his qilgan kunlarim, va oxir-oqibat qo’limdan hech narsa kelmaydi deb o’ylagan paytimda ham kelganim, hammasi shu yerda. Bir yil oldin men tibbiyotga faqat orzu qilsa bo’ladigan, qo’l yetmas narsa deb qarardim. Menimcha, bu yo’lni faqat mega miya va dov yurak odamlar bosib o’toladi

93🤩93🔥60👏21👍4🎉1

21 Jul 2026, 16:58 UTC≈11,100 views333 reactionsread 18 August 2026

“Sababini keltirib, Allohdan so'ra va u beradi!” degan gaplarni yoshligimdan beri eshitib kelaman. Faqatgina o'tgan hafta o'zimga savol berdim. Allohga biz qiladigan sabablar o'zi kerakmi? Masalan, rizqimiz kengroq bo'lishi uchun qo'shimcha ish topishimiz, shifo topish uchun malham surtishimiz, yoki biror narsaga erishish uchun o'qishimiz. Shundoq ham bizga hammasini berishi mumkin-ku? Oxirgi oylarda menda yuzimga

212👏48🔥38🥰22👍7😢4🤩2

21 Jul 2026, 16:55 UTC≈7,240 views156 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

82🔥24😁20🎉19🥰8🤩3

20 Jul 2026, 20:27 UTC≈8,410 views305 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Hozirgi paytda deyarli har kuni bo’ladigan eng og’ir dilemma: Odamga o’xshab erta uxlab, sahar turish. Yoki… Baribir ketamanku deb oila bilan vaqt o’tkazib bomdodgacha uxlamaslik Qaysi biri yutayotganini postim yozilgan vaqt sotib qo’yadi😂💔

144😁111🔥28👍14👏4🥰4

20 Jul 2026, 08:15 UTC≈8,180 views222 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Normallashtirish va mustaqil fikr yo'qligi buzilish boshlanishi uchun eng muhim ikki faktor. Kichkinaligimizda sigaret chekish juda yomon odat deb o'ylaymiz, ota-onalarimiz buni ta'qiqlashgani uchun. Katta bo'lib, atrofda ko'pchilik chekishini ko'rib bu holatni normallashtiramiz va agar shaxsiy prinsiplarimiz bo'lmasa yoki zarari katta emasligiga o'zimizni ishontira olsak biz ham sigaret chekuvchiga aylanamiz. Bu b

141🔥43👏19🥰7👍6🎉3😁3

17 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC≈8,900 views205 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Bugun “jichcha” ko’proq yozaman) Kecha video ko’rib qoldim. Videoning mazmuni hamma odamlar “Gen Z o’qimayabdi!” degan bir paytda bizda qanchadan qancha muvaffaqiyat keyslari bo’layotgani va yoshlar qanchalik avval erishmagan yutuqlarga erishayotgani haqida edi. Va oxirida “hali bizga qo’yib bering va biz buni isbotlaymiz” kabi so’zlar bilan tugallangan. Bu gapda jon bor. Lekin, qo’shimcha qilmoqchiman. Rostanam,

118🔥49🥰13👍12🎉7👏4🤩2

14 Jul 2026, 03:52 UTC≈8,940 views243 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Agar siz bugun o’zingizni noto’g’ri qarorlar, yomon do’stlar, yoki muvaffaqiyatsizlikka uchragan maqsadlar ichida qolganingizni va tengdoshlaringiz ishda, hayotda sizdan yaxshiroq ketayotganini ONGLI ravishda ko’rsangiz… siz o’zingiz o’ylaganchalik yomon holatda emassiz. Aksincha, bu yanada yaxshiroq. Tushuntiraman. Birinchidan, anglash bu o’zgarishning yarmi. Qanchadan-qancha odam yillab noto’g’ri yo’lda yurib, bu

156🔥55🥰14👏11👍7

5 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC≈11,400 views260 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Tunov kuni ajoyib bir post qo’ydik. Sobiq o’quvchim va xodimim ochgan markaz haqida. Videoda faqat iliq so’zlar ishlatilgan. U mening eng sevimli o’quvchilarimdan edi. Uning o’sganini ko’rish men uchun g’urur edi, va buni shunchaki ochiq aytdim. Javob esa kutilmagan bo’ldi. O’sha post ostida menga qarshi so’zlar yog’ildi: “sizdan o’zib ketishdi”, “ular endi sizdan zo’r”. Qizig’i yozganlarning deyarli hammasi ham bi

167🔥47🥰20👍14🎉5👏5🤩2

5 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈10,600 views191 reactionsread 18 August 2026

3 kunlik syomkadan keyin shuni tushundimki… Natijaga qanchalik katta muhimlik bersak, jarayonga ham shuncha muhimlik berish kerak ekan. Bu yangi gap emas, bilaman. O’ylab qoldim, “lekin, jarayon har doim ham bizga yoqavermaydi?!” Masalan, har kunlik o’lgidek yomon ko’radigan ishingiz, oylab ko’tarilmayotgan ballingiz, jiningiz suymaydigan odamlar bilan o’tgan vaqtingiz yoki siz shunchaki ketolmayotgan har bir joy.

🔥10156👍19🥰8🎉4👏2🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @marifatjamal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ibrat Farzandlari
@ibratfarzandlari · 84,514
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Marifat Jamal | Fikrlar (Uzbek)” (@marifatjamal), 13,367 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marifatjamal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.