Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
🧭 Психолог Черкашина Мария
@mariacherkashina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
402subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001701776539 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mariacherkashina |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mariacherkashina |
Topic
Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 402 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 404 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 405 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 408 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 411 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 411 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 14 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 54.2% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Друзья, мы вернулись из отпуска в Геленджике. Не была там очень много лет и приятно удивлена изменениям города и окрестностей. Подробности нашего прекрасного отдыха и катания на Вейке описала в сториз в запрещенной сети, возможно повторю здесь, а подробности места, которое мы выбрали для проживания, разместила в Максе
🔥7👍1
1. Ну почему же. Многие интуитивно чувствуют и понимают, чего им недостаточно было в детстве. Просто в терапии вырисовывается более четкая картина. 2. Это лучше в мой канал по детско-родительским отношениям: https://t.me/vzroslenie_separacia В двух словах не скажешь. Там я это все разбираю. Ребенок часто получает то, чего родителям нехватало, потому что они автоматом закрывают ему свои дефициты. Но при этом у нег…
❤7
Есть ряд вопросов: 1. Я правильно поняла, что самой не понять, что за дефициты у тебя? 2. Где список того, что нужно дать детям и как понять, что ребенку достаточно? Понимаю, чтим им все равно будет, что рассказать своему терапевту, но все ж… нужен чек-лист 😂
Очень захотелось в терапию.
Очень важная мысль о психотерапии и о закрытии своих дефицитов из детско-родительских отношений. Я искренне рекомендую прослушать это каждому 👆 Послушать в Макс
❤6👍2🔥1
Ну что, друзья? Продлили телеграмм-премиум ? Остаетесь в тг или уже все ?
- Остаюсь до последнего88%
- Нет, уже редко захожу12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Спасибо всем за отклик и голоса. Вижу, что тех, кто уже использует Макс, достаточно много. Я уже создала там канал и скоро начну его наполнять. Сейчас разбираюсь с тем, как привязать комментарии под посты Присоединяетесь лучше сейчас, т.к если полностью заблокируют тг, даже перейти по ссылке может не получится : https://max.ru/join/KuxttRnkLn4c23KSbbMDxfkJFsqjpeaEttR_x9f6cJQ
Ваши ответы мне нужны для дальнейшей стратегии поведения в соц сетях
Вы уже пользуетесь мессенджером Макс?
- Да, но не активно19%
- Да, вполне активно44%
- Пойду туда только если тг «ляжет»17%
- Нет и не планирую19%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ну что, дорогие мои.. Ситуация такова, что я вынуждена задать вам несколько вопросов) ответьте пожалуйста, не пропускайте этот опрос 🙏
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mariacherkashina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ну что, друзья? Продлили телеграмм-премиум ? Остаетесь в тг или уже все ?
- Остаюсь до последнего88%
- Нет, уже редко захожу12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вы уже пользуетесь мессенджером Макс?
- Да, но не активно19%
- Да, вполне активно44%
- Пойду туда только если тг «ляжет»17%
- Нет и не планирую19%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 30 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧭 Психолог Черкашина Мария” (@mariacherkashina), 402 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mariacherkashina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.