Channel
@mari_stani1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,140subscribers
-66 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001563348220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mari_stani1 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mari_stani1 |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 2,140 | -1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 2,141 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 2,149 | -7 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 2,156 | -5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 2,161 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:14 | 2,168 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 2,169 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 2,172 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 2,179 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 2,190 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 2,196 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 2,203 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 2,206 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 2,206 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
203 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 151 | 74.4% | |
| 😱 | 19 | 9.36% | |
| 💘 | 15 | 7.39% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 3.94% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 3.45% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.48% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодняшний улов с WB до 68 размера На базовые топы никогда не жалко денег. Они нужны в любое время года Белый Бежевый И конечно ОНИ💅🏻 Леопардовые брюки с лампасами. Мне очень хотелось добавить в новый гардероб что-то яркое и вкусное, а не просто джинсами и футболками заполнить Коричневые брюки Серые брюки ‼️Берите в свой размер. Не больше не меньше. Тогда они будут идеально сидеть!
❤8
У меня были жесткие ограничения по жидкости после операции. Как раз, чтобы не было отеков. Мне было тяжело пить меньше кофе, колы (хотела бы сказать и воды, но я ее реально мало пила и ДО операции) Сейчас уже возвращаюсь в прежний питьевой режим и это действительно могло повлиять 🙈
🙏8❤2
Соскучились? Из новостей только то, что отек усилился. Может из-за жары. Может из-за того, что сняла корсет Питание стараюсь держать, алкоголь не пью, поэтому других причин быть не может💗
❤17👍4
Сегодня пришли летние платья на новый размер Очень непривычно для меня - прямой фасон Размеры от 52 до 66 Очень Ленская приятная ткань. Идеально на жаркое лето☀️ *не смотрите на длину. Мой рост 158 см. Вам будет короче Зебра черно-белая Розовое Желтое Бело-сереневое
❤12
Про цену: Операция стоила 1 000 000 рублей. +анализы и другие траты после операции. Я видела, что в комментариях к моим видео девочки писали, что у них подобные операции и по 400 тыс выходили, но я таких цен не видела давно🙈 тем более, если вы оперируетесь с лишним весом. Хирурги так себе и новички - вас не возьмут. Это большой риск и нужен большой опыт! Хирурги с опытом - за шоколадку вас оперировать не возьмут) …
❤15😱2
Сейчас уже хорошо, но все равно, энергии мало) ограничение все индивидуальны. По сути - уже через 2 недели можно в спорт зал, а через месяц в бассейн. Но у меня не так. Из-за проблем со швом я пока берегу его и лечу его. Но каких-то бытовых ограничений - нет. Но в спорт зал и подобное пока нежелательно))
💘7❤1
Про Лусине и нашу консультацию
😱17💘4😭3
Не очень хотела это рассказывать, но поделюсь)
💘4
1. Высокая цена. Да, я все понимаю, но 4 миллиона у Лусине это много🙈 2. На очной консультации было несколько моментов, которые меня смутили. 3. Я нашла хирурга, у которого оооочень крутые работы именно по животам. В том числе у не худых девочек. Я подписалась. Доооолго наблюдала. Пошла на консультацию и там вопросы все отпали. Произошел мэтч 100%💗🎀
❤11
Гоняю по дому без корсета. Просто в утягивающей майке. *только не пересылайте это моему хирургу 🙈🙈🙈
❤16
Всем привет💗 не знаю, что здесь рассказывать про операцию или про себя🙈 в других соц сетях уже почти все рассказала Есть у вас вопросы? Напишите в комментариях. Постараюсь на все прям сегодня ответить💗
❤9
Ну вы видели уже до после?)) выложила во все соц сети. Там откровенно, главное, чтоб не забанили🙈🙈🙈
❤23
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mari_stani1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МАРИ СТАНИ” (@mari_stani1), 2,140 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mari_stani1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.