Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Фонд Марджани

Channel

Фонд Марджани

@mardjanifoundation

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,469subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001780068498
TypeChannel
Username@mardjanifoundation
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mardjanifoundation

Growth

1,4691,4761,472.57 August 2026 — 1,476 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,476 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,475 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,474 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,472 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,469 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,468–1,477 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 18:051,469-3
14 Aug 2026, 14:551,472-2
11 Aug 2026, 07:451,474-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:511,475-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:021,476no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:541,476first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 1,469 subscribers
Avg views / post
293
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held7 (12 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,170
Reactions total82
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

149 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9865.8%
👍3825.5%
custom 547216487488684669996.04%
custom 519066126362924381821.34%
👏21.34%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC162 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌳💦 Лето – повод провести время на даче и отвлечься от городского шума и суеты 🍒🫙 На фото: 1) Колыбанов С.С. «В саду». 2) Китаев А.И. «Двор в деревне». 1956 г. 3) Саидов М.А. «Мальчик с велосипедом». 1986 г. Коллекция Фонда Марджани

10custom 54721648748868466992👍1

3 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC249 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍉 3 августа в разных странах отмечают вкусный праздник – День арбуза 🍉 На фото: Урманче Б.И. «Натюрморт с арбузом». 1948 г. Коллекция Фонда Марджани ❇️ Фонд Марджани в Telegram / VK / MAX

14👍9

30 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC404 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

☕️ Эта кружка конической формы, на низком поддоне, покрыта глазурью поверх росписи черной, желтой и зеленой красками. На дне – персонаж в красной рубахе и широкой колоколовидной юбке с ромбовидным узором. Левая рука упирается в бедро, а правая держит кубок на высокой ножке. Снаружи на стенках – 4 рыбы🐟🐟 🔰Остается вопрос о том, что именно означают раздвоенные и заостренные на концах черные «ленты». Если часть исслед

14👍6👏1

28 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC355 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🖥 После выходных или отпуска важно не забывать, как правильно вести себя на рабочем месте ❗️ На фото: 1) Плакат «Работая за бортом, проверяй лопарь у подвесок и пользуйся предохранительным поясом». Баку. Типография Бакполиграф. 1937 г. 2) Плакат «Не продувши, не зажигай форсунок и становись сбоку». Художник: Мирзоев. Баку. Азерцентропечать. 1937 г. 3) Плакат «Посыпай песком лестницу и площадку». Художник: Веревкин А

16👍7custom 51906612636292438182

17 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC460 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💎🤩🤩 Основным материалом для изготовления татарских украшений служили серебро и золото. Ювелиры, в особенности казанские, виртуозно пользовались всевозможными техниками: плоской, бугорчатой и накладной сканью, чеканкой, литьем, гравировкой, чернением, зернью, инкрустацией драгоценными камнями. 💅 В традиционный комплекс татарских украшений входили разнообразные ювелирные изделия: ⭐Каптырма – украшение в виде застежки

19custom 54721648748868466996👍1

16 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC370 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Персональная выставка Аладдина Гарунова «Аладдин Гарунов. Путь. Форма. Образ» в Московском музее современного искусства (Москва, улица Петровка, д. 25) продлена по 13 сентября😊 Работы Аладдина Гарунова интересны неожиданными и смелыми сочетаниями материалов и фактур. Классические холст – масло в его работах дополняются резиной, фрагментами ковров, бытовыми предметами. Экспериментируя и мастерски обыгрывая в одном

8👍6👏1

12 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC525 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎣 Во второе воскресенье июля отмечается День рыбака 🐟🫧 На фото: 1) Сотников А.Г. Скульптура «Счастливые рыбаки». Год создания формы — 1958. 2) Ильин И.И. «Рыбаки». 1974 г. 3) Шпады А.А. «Натюрморт с кошмой». 1977 г. Коллекция Фонда Марджани ❇️ Фонд Марджани в Telegram / VK / MAX

17👍8custom 54721648748868466991

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @mardjanifoundation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фонд Марджани” (@mardjanifoundation), 1,469 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mardjanifoundation.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.