9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,133–3,151 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 16:23
3,135
-2
24 Aug 2026, 20:34
3,137
-1
20 Aug 2026, 19:48
3,138
-4
17 Aug 2026, 10:47
3,142
-1
14 Aug 2026, 07:23
3,143
-1
10 Aug 2026, 23:28
3,144
-4
8 Aug 2026, 00:27
3,148
-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:30
3,149
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:18
3,149
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 4 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14m 54s
Average length
2m 29s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,391 reactions across 10 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
654
47.0%
❤
307
22.1%
👍
131
9.42%
😁
92
6.61%
custom 5363955845333791632
50
3.59%
😱
42
3.02%
🤣
21
1.51%
🤯
16
1.15%
custom 5381960502857448984
11
0.791%
custom 5382059501853622024
10
0.719%
😍
10
0.719%
🍾
7
0.503%
🤩
5
0.359%
🎄
4
0.288%
👏
4
0.288%
⚡
3
0.216%
❤🔥
3
0.216%
🆒
3
0.216%
👾
3
0.216%
🥴
3
0.216%
9 further kinds
12
0.863%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,391reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2024 to 14 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 10 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marchik3d. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 December 2024 to 14 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Салют, решил поделиться ещё одним интересным кейсом)
В прошлом году написали мне из HOODYAKOV Production и попросили воссоздать и зарендерить интерьер под один шот для короткого рекламного ролика.
На входе были студийный шот с хромаком, фото расстановки интерьера с прошлой съёмки и фотографии элементов интерьера отдельно.
По фоткам вымоделил предметы мебели (носорог фотограмметрией), отмэтчил всё под присланные ка…
Годик прошёл с последнего поста, а значит пора закинуть новую текучку)
Оформили на беханс ещё одни апартаменты.
Схема такая же: моделил всякие красивые штуки, Юля рендерила.
Из интересного были гобелены с разнофактурными тканями и стежками, которые красил в пеинтере, и красивейшая люстра от Fortuny.
Несколько дней просидел, разгадывая хитросплетения узелков и завязочек подвеса.
В итоге производитель оказался душко…
Выложили на Behance свежий проект апартаментов.
Я там много моделил и шейдил разных штук, а Юля много визила, поэтому поэкспериментировали с а-ля журнальной вёрсткой при подаче, чтобы всё это красиво представить — приглашаю поскроллить🤗
🎨 Ссылка 🎨
UPD На 3ddd Юля тоже выложила, можете лайкнуть при желании, вдруг гору возмёт👑
UPD2 Гору взяли)
#portfolio
@marchik3d
Сейчас маловато времени на вдумчивые посты, извиняйте)
Так что сегодня не урок, а ещё один трибьют Сабстанс Дизайнеру как инструменту, который позволяет за минуты и играючи решать задачки, которые без него потребовали бы часа гуглежа подходящей текстуры, ковыряния нойзами и противных самой человеческой природе манипуляций в фотошопах и Бог знает в чём ещё)
Кайфую каждый раз как в первый. (А оно ведь ещё и всегда бе…
🟠Разъяснительно-исторический пост на тему нейминга версий Corona Renderer, а то в последнее время новички стали конкретно путаться.
Во-первых, на днях в релиз выпустили Corona 12 update 1 hotfix 1 (неполный список изменений на скриншоте), который исправляет
лагучесть интерактива и в целом рабочего процесса Corona 12 update 1, на которую многие жаловались в последнее время и из-за которой не спешили обновляться. Я вс…
Очередное видео из рубрики запросов из максочата. Сегодня я принёс вам радиального шпона покушать, приятного аппетита 🥣 новичкам особенно!
0:24 Схематично моделим дверь.
3:24 Первый способ с помощью фотошопа.
4:22 Создаём свой action в фотошопе и используем batch.
6:52 Накладываем текстуру.
8:06 Второй способ, не покидая макс.
11:07 Допиливаем материал.
#useful #learn
@marchik3d
⬆️⬆️⬆️
В максочате Михаил выложил финальный рендер своей сцены с бухтой, водопадом, коралловым рифом, рыбками и всякими другими красивостями, демонстрирующий потрясную работу с каустиками, и поверхностными и вольюметрическими, ну и вообще, там колоссальный объём работы проделан.
О чём он скромно обычно предпочитает умалчивать?
О том, что рендер выполнен в его собственном рендер-движке Dali Renderer, который он сам, …
🔥93👍15❤11🤯8👏2🤩2🍓1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @marchik3d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 547,247 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“marchik3d” (@marchik3d), 3,135 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marchik3d.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
