Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Marc Gold Cartel 👑

Channel

Marc Gold Cartel 👑

@marcgoldcartel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,520subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001188063091
TypeChannel
Username@marcgoldcartel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/marcgoldcartel

Growth

2,5202,5232,521.513 Aug 2026, 08:01 — 2,523 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 03:29 — 2,520 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 08:0114 Aug 2026, 03:29
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,520–2,523 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:292,520-3
13 Aug 2026, 08:012,523first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 02s
Average length
2m 31s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

43 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2762.8%
🐳1023.3%
🕊24.65%
12.33%
🎉12.33%
💯12.33%
🔥12.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 11 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Feb 2026, 08:16 UTC≈2,400 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @profaifxPhoto

🐻 Transparency Update Portfolio: +82.89% overall (-13.8% yesterday) Yesterday was tough. Market conditions moved against our positions. This is the reality of trading - we manage risk, not eliminate it. What matters now: → Learning from this drawdown → Tightening risk controls → Staying disciplined on our proven edge Still up 94%+ overall. The strategy works, but I'm refining execution to minimize volatility. Your tr

5

10 Feb 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,960 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @profaifxPhoto

ZOOM IN! 🐂🐻 Yes, we got all green last week. And will be expecting to have more this week If you’re busy, Dont have time to trade, Got another job to do, No time to watch the market? Yes; this is the solution for you. Copytrading with low risk but more than enough! Pm admin now!!!

1

8 Feb 2026, 12:56 UTC≈1,610 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📊 Daily Performance (Start Capital: $100) 📅 2/2/2026 PnL: +$1.91 Equity: $101.91 Growth: +1.91% 📅 3/2/2026 PnL: +$26.21 Equity: $128.12 Growth: +28.12% 📅 4/2/2026 PnL: +$7.42 Equity: $135.54 Growth: +35.54% 📅 5/2/2026 PnL: +$13.25 Equity: $148.79 Growth: +48.79% 📅 6/2/2026 PnL: +$21.47 Equity: $170.26 Growth: +70.26% 📅 7/2/2026 PnL: +$17.06 Equity: $187.32 Growth: +87.32% Hurry up guys. We’re going to trade ag

21

8 Feb 2026, 00:30 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

GM! I’m very sorry that never invited you guys The thing is I’ve been trading alone and dont have time to send out signals anymore. That is why I want to open the opportunity for those who interested to follow my trades. I will share my investor account so you guys can see my performance. Transparent. I want to take care of my capital, so are my clients. If you want to join me, just pm my admin “I’m in” @BenScal

5 Feb 2026, 05:13 UTC751 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @profaifxVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

5 Feb 2026, 04:12 UTC709 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @profaifxVideo

RAW!! Trading without emotion is just something else! Please hear what I said in the video, it’s a 3 minute video without any cut, and you can see how the robot work @BenScalperGF

4 Feb 2026, 10:04 UTC657 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @profaifxPhoto

Sorry boys you are too LATE! WITHDRAW another 10,000 🤭 And I still have a balance of 10,685 to continue trade for tomorrow My SOP for this EA? Not trade during US session Reason: too volatile and got market manipulation

🐳3🎉1💯1

4 Feb 2026, 09:50 UTC481 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @profaifxPhoto

DEPOSIT 5,000. WITHDRAW 20,000 This robot is just madnesss. Making profit like there’s no tomorrow, you can see the trading history too I can guarantee that you can pay your commitment within one day, no hanky panky 😌 Pm me now boyssss

3

4 Feb 2026, 09:50 UTC439 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @profaifxVideo

It’s been a while guys. After so many attempts to build this robot and compatible with AI, now I’m ready to launch this robot! Omg I can’t wait to give you guys a try. Please watch the video until the end. If you can calculate exact profit I made, then I will share this robot with you. Sounds good? Now, don’t wait, cause I’m running this robot as I write this message. Pm my admin now @BenScalperGF

3🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @marcgoldcartel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Sept 2025, 02:41 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

Will gold breaks 3700 by end of this month?

  1. Yes 🚀84%
  2. No 👎16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 11 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 45,905 of 1,563,849entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Marc Gold Cartel 👑” (@marcgoldcartel), 2,520 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marcgoldcartel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.