Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مرافئ العفاف

Channel

مرافئ العفاف

@marafi20

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,447subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001873668896
TypeChannel
Username@marafi20
Description@Marafi200bot تواصل النساء
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/marafi20

Growth

3,44717 Aug 2026, 23:30 — 3,447 subscribers17 Aug 2026, 23:45 — 3,447 subscribers17 Aug 2026, 23:3017 Aug 2026, 23:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,444–3,450 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 23:453,447no change
17 Aug 2026, 23:303,447first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 3,447 subscribers
Avg views / post
498
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total5,973
Reactions total150
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
66
Videos
15
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 20s
Average length
2m 20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

288 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯18162.8%
👍10737.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC125 views11 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @Mobadarat_afaf_c

🔴إعلان مبادرة عفاف قررت إدارة مبادرة عفاف فتح قناة خاصة للنساء، وذلك لتسهيل البحث على الإخوة الذين طال انتظارهم أو تعثّر البحث لهم. القناة ستكون وفق شروط وضوابط صارمة تحفظ خصوصية الرجال والنساء، وتضمن الجدية والاحترام. ⚠️للانضمام @Mobadarat_afaf_w 📌 إدارة مبادرة عفاف

👍10💯1

7 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC365 views16 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🖌لا تنتظري رد الإحسان من أعظم ما قد يفسد الأعمال الصالحة أن يعلق الإنسان قلبه بجزاء الخلق ، أو بالمقابل في الدنيا، يُحسن وهو ينتظر إحسانا، ويُكرم وهو يترقب تقديرا، فإذا لم يجد فترت همته وضعف عطاؤه، أو ربما انقلب إحسانه جفاء. وهذا يظهر جليا في الحياة الزوجية قد تُحسن زوجة إلى زوجها، وتبذل من وقتها وجهدها، ولا يكون همها بهذا رضا الله، وإنما تنتظر أن يعاملها بالمثل وأن يُثني عليها وأن يُقابل إحسانها بإحسان مثله. فإذ

💯12👍4

5 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC432 views12 reactionsread 17 August 2026
File

🖌يريدك زوجة لا شيخا.

💯11👍1

3 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC500 views16 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🪶خروج المرأة من البيت يكونُ للحاجة🪶 قال الله سبحانه: ﴿وَقَرۡنَ فِی بُیُوتِكُنَّ وَلَا تَبَرَّجۡنَ تَبَرُّجَ ٱلۡجَـٰهِلِیَّةِ ٱلۡأُولَىٰ﴾. قال مجاهد، في قوله: ﴿وَلاَ تَبَرَّجْنَ تَبَرُّجَ ٱلْجَاهِلِيَّةِ ٱلأُولَىٰ﴾، قال: كانت المرأة تتمشَّى بين الرجال، فذلك تبرج الجاهلية. ["التفسير" لعبد الرزاق (٢٣٤٠)] وقال سبحانه: ﴿وَلَمَّا وَرَدَ مَاۤءَ مَدۡیَنَ وَجَدَ عَلَیۡهِ أُمَّةࣰ مِّنَ ٱلنَّاسِ یَسۡقُونَ وَوَجَدَ مِن دُونِه

💯11👍5

1 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC457 views17 reactionsread 17 August 2026

عجبي لنساء يُنسبن لحرائر المسلمين، تسمع حديث كاسيات عاريات، وتُصر على تضييق ثوبها. تسمع رؤوسهن كأسنمة البخت، لا يدخلن الجنة ولا يجدن ريحها، فترفع شعرها تشبها بالبهائم. تسمع حكم النمص، وهو اللعن والطرد من رحمة الله، فتتفنن في نمص حاجبيها. تسمع أن التعطر زنا، فتنتقي أجمل العطور للخروج. ويل لهن، ويل لهن!! إقراركِ بأن ما تفعلينه ذنب ليس مبررا لفعلك! لكونك إن أنكرتِ حرمته مرقتِ من الإسلام أصلا. فلا تتفضلي على الخالق جل

💯13👍4

31 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC475 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026

ما حدود طاعة الزوج في الإسلام؟

💯8👍1

31 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC565 views7 reactionsread 17 August 2026
File

أخطاء زوجية تدمر الأسرة الشيخ عبدالسلام الشويعر ❤️

💯6👍1

27 Jul 2026, 21:41 UTC579 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026
File

🎙شيء من باب شهادة المرأة.

👍6💯3

26 Jul 2026, 16:27 UTC762 views24 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🖌هل كون الرجل طالب علم كافٍ ليكون زوجًا صالحًا؟ هذه نظرة شائعة تحتاج وقفة، كثير من الأخوات الآن يغلب في اختيارهن للزوج وصف واحد، فيُغني عندهن عن سائر الأوصاف. فإذا قيل : فلان طالب علم، ارتسمت في أذهانهن صورة الزوج الكامل، وغاب عنهن أن العلم -مع شرفه وفضله- ليس وحده هو الذي تبنى عليه الحياة. لا ريب أن طالب العلم الشرعي يرجى فيه الخير، ويحسن الظن به، عن الحسن البصري قال : قَدْ كَانَ الرَّجُلُ يَطْلُبُ العِلْمَ فَلَا

👍15💯9

25 Jul 2026, 20:25 UTC494 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

المرأة التي تهجر فراش زوجها❕

💯7👍2

23 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC633 views10 reactionsread 17 August 2026

▫️الصدقة مما ينجي النساء من عذاب النار عن عبدالله بن مسعود 💚 قال : قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم : "يَا مَعْشَرَ النِّسَاءِ ، تَصَدَّقْنَ وَلَوْ مِنْ حُلِيِّكُنَّ ؛ فَإنَّكُنَّ أكْثَرُ أهْلِ جَهَنَّمَ يَوْمَ القِيَامَةِ". فَقَامَتِ امْرَأةٌ لَيْسَتْ مِنْ عِلْيَةِ النِّسَاءِ فَقَالَتْ : بِمَ نَحْنُ أكْثَرُ أهْلِ جَهَنَّمَ يَوْمَ القِيَامَةِ؟. فَقَالَ : "إنَّكُنَّ تُكْثِرْنَ اللَّعْنَ وَتَكْفُرْنَ العَشِيرَ

💯7👍3

19 Jul 2026, 21:34 UTC586 views10 reactionsread 17 August 2026
File

تنبيه هام للمرأة حول ارتداء الملابس الضيقة أمام امرأة أخرى.

💯6👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @marafi20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

📣🌸بث حلقات المعلمة أم عُبيدة🌸📣
@omobaida994 · 87,594
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مرافئ العفاف” (@marafi20), 3,447 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marafi20.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.