Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

maodesin

@maodesin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,258subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001818088789
TypeChannel
Username@maodesin
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/maodesin

Growth

1,2571,2591,2587 August 2026 — 1,257 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,257 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,259 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,258 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,257–1,259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:121,258-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:071,259+2
7 Aug 2026, 03:301,257no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:181,257first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.38%
avg views ÷ 1,258 subscribers
Avg views / post
118
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (27 February 20264 August 2026)
Views total118
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC118 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @yfcnz1111Photo

Лекция о Красном: типа, что будем пить сегодня красное или белое? м, нет, не сегодня Я прогуливала колористику в институте, ладно, я была на двух лекциях, мои одногруппники не удостоили колористику и тем малым.. Когда мы встретились они спросили: че, Насть, колористика ваще норм темка? Я сказала: мне это на*фиг надо, главное, что необходимо знать: красный — возбуждает. Красный: цвет смерти и новой жизни, цвет крови,

25 Jun 2026, 15:00 UTC575 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀 Я фанат конструкторов. Буквально, это единственное во что я играл не зависимо от своего возраста. И примечательно, что конструкторы всегда были разными: лего, биониклы, модульное оригами, постройка шалашей во дворе, майнкрафт, веб-сайты и так далее… Но самым первым и любимым моим конструктором стал картон. Да, абсолютно обычный, ничем не примечательный лист картона способен раскрыть

2 May 2026, 10:28 UTC713 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @selectsspaceVideo

Video, posted without a caption

6 Apr 2026, 22:42 UTC930 viewsread 7 August 2026

Год назад на алтае был, очень много материала лежит без дела Че может смонтировать уже наконец?)

24 Mar 2026, 16:56 UTC951 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @artelgaboVideo

artelgabo_debute.mp4 Дебютная коллекция гобеленов «Птичий медиум» уже онлайн!

24 Mar 2026, 16:56 UTC750 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲 🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲 🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲 🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲 🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲 🤍Очень долгое время я безустанно бьюсь в попытках понять кто я такой и чего хочу. День за днём, вот уже несколько лет, меня тревожат вопросы касаемые смысла моего существования. Но тревога лишь съедает меня изнутри, и это до ужаса болезненно. Самое травматичное — это с концами потерянное время, которое уже никогда не вернуть. Я думаю целые месяцы, а то и года б

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @maodesin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 190,056 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“maodesin” (@maodesin), 1,258 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maodesin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.