Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Manuzleek

Channel

Manuzleek

@manuzleek

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,722subscribers

-307 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001232433912
TypeChannel
Username@manuzleek
DescriptionПоддержать копейкой: https://boosty.to/manuzleek
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held37
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/manuzleek

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,72113,02912,87529 August 2026 — 13,029 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,029 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,028 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,027 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,019 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,012 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,004 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,989 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,881 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,875 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,877 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,869 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,865 subscribers30 September 2026 — 12,793 subscribers5 October 2026 — 12,773 subscribers10 October 2026 — 12,781 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,779 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,775 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,770 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,773 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,775 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,771 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,770 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,769 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,763 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,761 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,757 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,750 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,753 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,751 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,749 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,743 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,738 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,731 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,728 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,721 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,722 subscribers12,72229 August 20262 November 2026
37 measurements spanning 65 days, net -307. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,675–13,075 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 16:2512,722+1
1 Nov 2026, 13:4712,721-7
31 Oct 2026, 16:0612,728-3
30 Oct 2026, 18:2812,731-7
29 Oct 2026, 21:5612,738-5
29 Oct 2026, 00:1112,743-6
28 Oct 2026, 00:1912,749-2
27 Oct 2026, 03:0612,751-2
26 Oct 2026, 02:5412,753+3
25 Oct 2026, 01:2112,750-7
24 Oct 2026, 00:3412,757-4
23 Oct 2026, 00:0112,761-2
22 Oct 2026, 00:1612,763-6
20 Oct 2026, 16:4412,769-1
19 Oct 2026, 19:3912,770-1
18 Oct 2026, 16:5912,771-4
17 Oct 2026, 19:3812,775+2
16 Oct 2026, 20:5512,773+3
15 Oct 2026, 20:3612,770-5
14 Oct 2026, 22:2612,775first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.9%
avg views ÷ 12,722 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,420
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held44 (11 August 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total68,480
Reactions total1,729
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 05:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
415
Videos
89
Links
696

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3,744 reactions across 44 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,39337.2%
🔥47912.8%
👍3048.12%
💅2737.29%
🐳2627.00%
🥰1263.37%
💩912.43%
🤔892.38%
❤‍🔥862.30%
🎉842.24%
🥴701.87%
💘691.84%
🆒601.60%
💋541.44%
😭431.15%
👎381.01%
⚡300.801%
🫡300.801%
👏270.721%
👨‍💻240.641%
19 further kinds1122.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,744 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Nov 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,230 views35 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Выживаем https://youtube.com/live/S9Lg4xepNvQ?feature=share

🔥28❤4🐳1💯1🤡1

1 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC≈2,030 views58 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Продолжаем играть в гамму одна жизнь https://www.youtube.com/live/Ubi4hhlDHzk

❤42👍11💯3👎1🤡1

31 Oct 2026, 15:05 UTC≈2,400 views72 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Стримчик по гамме с челленджом на 1к$ https://youtube.com/live/TadaQw5j_2s?feature=share

❤54👍9🔥7👎1💩1

31 Oct 2026, 14:33 UTC≈2,410 views64 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Погребенный финальная серия. Самая крутая короткометражка за последнее время, не шучу https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gx5A7IcqVng

🔥46❤9🐳4👍4🕊1

30 Oct 2026, 18:36 UTC≈2,860 views180 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Мне предложили челлендж, пройти гамму на инвиктус за 1к$, завтра скачаю и запущу, есть какие-то советы? И что значит " как у Джованни", шарит кто?

🥰106❤51🤯11🔥7👍5

30 Oct 2026, 15:15 UTC≈2,840 views46 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Стрим как в былые времена в 18 часов https://youtube.com/live/wuQV0oc57E8?feature=share

❤38👍4🔥2🤡1🥴1

30 Oct 2026, 14:11 UTC≈2,640 views57 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Там конкурс квестов на сталкер идёт, будет смотреть, что за моды участвуют, первый же годнейший https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSNcZTkDaSY

🔥45❤7⚡2👎2👍1

29 Oct 2026, 16:46 UTC≈2,970 views48 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Заходите на стрим пообщаться https://youtube.com/live/p84glD7dUZs?feature=share

❤40👨‍💻4🐳2👎1🥰1

29 Oct 2026, 16:13 UTC≈2,770 views80 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Хаваем последний контент https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E3IN-FhcsY

💋54🫡18😁5🔥2💩1

28 Oct 2026, 19:29 UTC≈3,110 views109 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Финал лост альфы https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDj32Bm4ZFo

🐳69👏26🌭8💅5😁1

28 Oct 2026, 16:51 UTC≈3,010 views62 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Стримчик (видос будет позже) https://youtube.com/live/oe2hNLqFkXw?feature=share

👍48💅10🤡2🐳1🤪1

27 Oct 2026, 19:50 UTC≈3,160 views103 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Лост альфа, осталась 1-2 серии до финала.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJLScaKHUaI

🎉69❤25🐳3👨‍💻3😢3

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @manuzleek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTCAnonymous Poll1,250 voters approx.

Реплики персонажей

  1. Читай вслух параллельно53%
  2. Не читай, мы сами смотрим по субтитрам50%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

fladarneverwillrise 🌃
@fladarsun · 37,699
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
Хата nbts'a
@nbtsok · 32,076
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 September 2026
ilmater⚜️
@ilmaterTG · 38,142
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Manuzleek” (@manuzleek), 12,722 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/manuzleek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.