Channel
@manuelstotz
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,153subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003011882782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @manuelstotz |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 2 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/manuelstotz |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @tonstrat/478 Jun 2026, 12:57 UTC | @manuelstotz/29 · this entry8 Jun 2026, 13:03 UTC | 1.00 | 6 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @tonstrat | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @tonstrat (7–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 September 2025 to 22 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @tonstrat. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 6 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 1,153 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 1,154 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 1,153 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 1,153 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 September 2025 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 918 |
| Reactions total | 53 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
🌍 This summer will see the largest rollout of a non-custodial crypto wallet in human history. ⚡️Instant zero-fee crypto transactions for over a billion users are about to become reality. 💎 We're bringing a native non-custodial Gram wallet to every Telegram app! 🏳️
Today, TON Strategy provided an update on the wind-down of our legacy operations and highlighted our strong preliminary June staking performance. TON Strategy has largely completed the primary operating actions associated with winding down its inherited social commerce and software businesses, a move expected to reduce annual cash operating expenses by ~$4 million while sharpening our focus on both our Gram treasury…
Today, TON Strategy announced we have entered into a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan under our existing $250 million share repurchase authorization. This plan is designed to facilitate share repurchases over a two-month period beginning July 1. Manuel Stotz, Executive Chairman of TON Strategy explained, “Disciplined capital allocation is a key driver of long-term shareholder returns. When our shares trade at a significant…
Today, TON Strategy Company highlighted strong preliminary staking performance last month while continuing to support the recent key upgrades designed to strengthen The Open Network (TON). These newly approved enhancements are intended to improve network performance, scalability, validation efficiency, and overall responsiveness as activity across the TON ecosystem continues to grow. As one of the largest validator…
Today, TON Strategy Company announced our financial results for the first quarter of 2026. Q1 2026 highlights include: ➡️Approx. 221.9 million units of $TON held at March 31, 2026, including approx. 221.2 million units staked. ➡️ ~4.29% of all Toncoin is held by TON Strategy Company as of March 31, 2026. ➡️Digital assets held had a fair value of approx. $272 million. ➡️Earned ~2.2 million units of $TON during Q1 of…
Today, TON Strategy Company is pleased to announce the appointment of Kevin Wilson as our new Chief Executive Officer, effective May 4, 2026. Wilson is a senior fintech executive and global markets professional with more than two decades of experience across financial markets, institutional trading and digital assets. Most recently, he served as Managing Director and Head of Integral Digital at Integral Development …
We’re excited to announce the launch of our new website, featuring an analytics treasury dashboard dedicated to our $TON-focused digital asset strategy. The dashboard offers clear visibility into our $TON holdings (as per our latest reporting) and key metrics—aligned with industry peers—supporting our mission to deliver transparent, regulated access to $TON via a public-market vehicle, enabling shareholders to parti…
https://x.com/coinbasemarkets/status/1990503887820787844?s=46&t=QCEMDSq1OEnMtFVBcoui6g
TON Strategy Co. (Nasdaq: $TONX) reports Q3 2025 Financial Results (ended 30th Sep 2025) Key Highlights: - $TON holdings valued at $587.8 million - Revenue: $3.6 million, up from $0.1 million in Q3 2024 - Book value per share of $10.82 “Our objective is to build a differentiated public company aligned with the expansion of The Open Network by holding and staking $TON over a long-term time horizon,” said Veronika Ka…
Asia is Telegram’s largest market and local users & investors alike are best placed to grasp the “Super App” potential of $TON Inside Telegram. Looking forward to speaking on stage at @token2049official Singapore, 2nd Oct, on behalf of @tonstrat (NASDAQ: $TONX).
Korea represents perhaps the most fascinating nascent market opportunity for both $TON and @tonstrat (NASDAQ: $TONX) in all of Asia. Neither is $TON yet listed on Korea’s largest crypto exchange Upbit, nor have I ever had the pleasure to visit Seoul beyond its airport. Can’t wait to speak at Korea Blockchain Week later this month & hope to meet you all in Seoul. Also co-hosting a side event on Sept 23 evening with …
The primary job of intelligent management is to allocate capital for the long-term benefit of shareholders. Issuing stock at a premium to book value (e.g. under our $1Bn ATM) last month and buying back stock (under our $250M Buyback Program) at a discount to book value this month - both are growing book value per share. Saylor calls it “harvesting volatility”. We are excited about announcing our initial share buyba…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @manuelstotz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 680,346 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Manuel Stotz” (@manuelstotz), 1,153 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/manuelstotz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.