Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Манеры

Channel

Манеры

@manery_for_you

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

85,567subscribers

-431 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001948244813
TypeChannel
Username@manery_for_you
DescriptionМанеры - лицо не только мужчины 😉 Ссылка для друга: https://t.me/+FHx-AN8ifB05MzZi Сотрудничество: @chembArovaD @Bobdylan_1 https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a38e79d6fa92100ecf8799
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/manery_for_you

Growth

85,56785,99885,782.57 August 2026 — 85,998 subscribers7 August 2026 — 85,992 subscribers8 August 2026 — 85,951 subscribers10 August 2026 — 85,917 subscribers11 August 2026 — 85,878 subscribers12 August 2026 — 85,831 subscribers13 August 2026 — 85,798 subscribers14 August 2026 — 85,761 subscribers15 August 2026 — 85,705 subscribers17 August 2026 — 85,644 subscribers18 August 2026 — 85,594 subscribers19 August 2026 — 85,567 subscribers7 August 202619 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 12 days, net -431. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85,502–86,063 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 08:2685,567-27
18 Aug 2026, 09:2485,594-50
17 Aug 2026, 09:2785,644-61
15 Aug 2026, 18:0785,705-56
14 Aug 2026, 07:0485,761-37
13 Aug 2026, 02:3385,798-33
12 Aug 2026, 04:0685,831-47
11 Aug 2026, 02:2185,878-39
10 Aug 2026, 02:0185,917-34
8 Aug 2026, 23:0285,951-41
7 Aug 2026, 22:1685,992-6
7 Aug 2026, 19:4585,998first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.65%
avg views ÷ 85,567 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,120
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held65 (3 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total202,845
Reactions total2,606
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,100
Videos
164
Links
3,550

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,606 reactions across 65 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍87933.7%
55921.5%
🤣36113.9%
😁26810.3%
💯26210.1%
🔥963.68%
👀271.04%
👏240.921%
🕊240.921%
💘190.729%
170.652%
🙈160.614%
🤯70.269%
💊60.23%
😢50.192%
🤔50.192%
🍌40.153%
💔40.153%
🫡40.153%
🏆30.115%
9 further kinds160.614%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,606reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 65 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @manery_for_you. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.54%
1 of 65 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,070
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,270
over 64 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwtL4aP119 August 202619 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC845 views16 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

✍🏻 Ценность этикета в том, что правила проведения подразумевают внимание к людям. Миллисент Фенвик 💎 Манеры

👍96🤝1

19 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,070 views1 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwtL4aPPhoto

Он лёг спать. А потом вы услышали, как он тихо взял телефон и ушёл в другую комнату 📱 И самое обидное — не то, что он там что-то смотрит. А то, что он выбрал это вместо вас 💔 Дальше включается привычное: «значит, я недостаточно». Недостаточно молодая, стройная, раскованная. Но сексологи объясняют это иначе. На экране — бесконечная новизна и быстрый результат без усилий. Мозг привыкает к сильному стимулу, и реальна

1

19 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC≈1,440 views16 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

❗️ Завершение трапезы в ресторане Этикет в кафе и ресторане предполагает не только хорошие манеры при общении друг с другом, но и обслуживающим персоналом. Если вам нужен счет, не нужно привлекать внимание официанта громкими выкриками или звоном металлического предмета о бокал. Достаточно подозвать его жестом. Решить, кто оплачивает ужин стоит заранее. Если вам понравилось обслуживание, оставьте чаевые. 💎 Манеры

👍124

18 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC≈2,120 views31 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Не флеймите ☺️ Флейм — это словесная война. Перепалка, во время которой спорщики отклоняются от темы, оскорбляют друг друга и пытаются унизить друг друга, чтобы вызвать ответную реакцию. Не стоит поддаваться провокациям и самому провоцировать конфликты. Любое сообщение, написанное в интернете, может «всплыть» в самый неподходящий момент и испортить репутацию. Не делайте того, что может негативно на вас отразиться.

👍24🕊3🫡21💊1

18 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC≈2,390 views18 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

🫤 Лицо, по которому можно всё понять и без слов 💎 Манеры

💘86👍3🍌1

18 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,530 views37 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

❓ Почему вы все еще одиноки? Когда вы собираетесь замуж? Почему у вас нет детей? Если у вас никого нет, люди спрашивают, почему вы одиноки. Если у вас есть партнер, спрашивают про замужество. Если вы замужем, спросят про детей. Эта цепочка бесконечна. Почему-то люди считают уместным задавать подобные вопросы. К сожалению, эти вопросы задают везде и в любой стране, даже на онлайн-просторах. Почему-то люди хотят пол

👍342💯1

18 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC≈2,650 views40 reactionsread 19 August 2026

🚫 Не флудите Флуд — это длинные бессмысленные сообщения, серия стикеров или картинок. Избегайте флуда, если его не принято использовать в чате или личной переписке с определённым человеком. Старайтесь писать кратко и по делу. 💎 Манеры

👍364

17 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈3,160 views44 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

🤨 «Вы беременны?» Если женщина беременна, она чаще всего сама об этом сообщает. Большая часть женщин думает о беременности, как о чем-то красивом, но что, если ваша собеседница не беременна? Что, если она просто набрала в весе? ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Или, предположим, женщина действительно носит плод любви под сердцем, но хочет ли она говорить об этом? В таких случаях позвольте человеку рассказать о своей беременности. По с

👍29💯65🤣4

17 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈2,910 views24 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

🫣 Когда общаешься с человеком, который каждое предложение заканчивает точкой 💎 Манеры

🤣204

17 Aug 2026, 05:55 UTC≈3,090 views50 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

✔️Пишите текст одним сообщением Не делите мысль на несколько отдельных сообщений. Это вызывает путаницу и раздражает. Лучше напишите одно общее сообщение, а затем перечитайте и при необходимости дополните текст. 💎 Манеры

21💯16👍11🔥2

16 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC≈3,180 views57 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

У каждого есть такой друг 😂 💎 Манеры

🤣436💯3🤯3😭2

16 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈2,900 views39 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

✍🏻 Хорошие манеры — лучшая защита от плохих манер тех, кто нас окружает. Филип Честерфилд 💎 Манеры

💯3072

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @manery_for_you. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 658,798 of 1,563,849entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Манеры” (@manery_for_you), 85,567 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/manery_for_you.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.