Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BTS LIVES

Channel

BTS LIVES

@mandarinasalarm

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,302subscribers

-110 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001995159993
TypeChannel
Username@mandarinasalarm
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mandarinasalarm

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,30215,41215,35728 August 2026 — 15,412 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,406 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,399 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,353 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,345 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,339 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,338 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,332 subscribers9 September 2026 — 15,329 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,323 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,317 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,308 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,302 subscribers28 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 20 days, net -110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,286–15,429 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 04:3815,302-6
15 Sept 2026, 02:1715,308-9
13 Sept 2026, 13:3815,317-6
11 Sept 2026, 18:1615,323-6
9 Sept 2026, 04:3915,329-3
5 Sept 2026, 23:3815,332-6
3 Sept 2026, 18:0115,338-1
2 Sept 2026, 10:4515,339-6
1 Sept 2026, 07:3815,345-8
31 Aug 2026, 10:5815,353-46
30 Aug 2026, 12:5415,399-7
29 Aug 2026, 11:3315,406-6
28 Aug 2026, 14:3015,412first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.0%
avg views ÷ 15,302 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,130
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held22 (26 May 20261 September 2026)
Views total12,400
Reactions total713
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6,417 reactions across 22 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,40684.2%
😭69310.8%
🥰1171.82%
💘701.09%
😍681.06%
🎉170.265%
💋170.265%
😘120.187%
👏40.062%
🆒30.047%
🤩30.047%
❤‍🔥20.031%
💯20.031%
🤗20.031%
🔥10.016%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,417 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mandarinasalarm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC≈2,190 views219 reactionsread 3 September 2026

LIVE DE JUNGKOOK https://weverse.io/bts/live/2-179935640?hl=es

168😭44🎉7

29 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC≈4,050 views220 reactionsread 3 September 2026

LIVE DE TAEHYUNG https://weverse.io/bts/live/3-240294314

180😭40

23 Aug 2026, 03:50 UTC≈6,160 views274 reactionsread 3 September 2026

LIVE DE HOBI https://weverse.io/bts/live/4-239763085

234😭30🥰10

20 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈6,290 views226 reactionsread 3 September 2026

LIVE DE TAEHYUNG https://weverse.io/bts/live/2-179412871

188😭30🥰5🎉2💘1

15 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC≈7,440 views317 reactionsread 3 September 2026

LIVE DE SUGA https://weverse.io/bts/live/0-179170784

248😭55🥰7👏4💋3

12 Aug 2026, 02:51 UTC≈7,700 views266 reactionsread 3 September 2026

LIVE DE TAEHYUNG Y JUNGKOOK https://weverse.io/bts/live/3-238699583

237💘10😍10😭8💋1

11 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC≈6,500 views254 reactionsread 3 September 2026

VOLVIÓ https://weverse.io/bts/live/1-178990811

224😭19💋11

11 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC≈6,130 views244 reactionsread 3 September 2026

LIVE DE JIN EN WEVERSE https://weverse.io/bts/live/0-178968197

195😭47💋2

7 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC≈6,810 views270 reactions10 Starsread 3 September 2026

LIVE DE V EN WEVERSE https://weverse.io/bts/live/0-178799428?hl=es

229😭27🥰7💘5🔥1🆒1

28 Jul 2026, 03:53 UTC≈9,200 views333 reactionsread 3 September 2026

LIVE DE JUNGKOOK https://weverse.io/bts/live/3-237335685

290💘26😍13😭2🆒2

27 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC≈8,610 views329 reactionsread 3 September 2026

LIVE DE JUNGKOOK EN WEVERSE https://weverse.io/bts/live/4-237273482

257😭59💘10😍3

10 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC≈11,500 views307 reactionsread 3 September 2026

LIVE DE JUNGKOOK EN WEVERSE, ya se acabó jajaja https://weverse.io/bts/live/2-177337974

244😭62🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @mandarinasalarm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BTS NEWS ⟭⟬⁷
@TangerinesOfBTS · 90,088
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
BTS CONTENIDO 𖥔
@btscontenidomandarinas · 41,577
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
✨𝗕𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗧𝗔𝗡𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗦𝗘⁷✨⊙⊝⊜
@BANGTANVERSECANAL · 73,328
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BTS LIVES” (@mandarinasalarm), 15,302 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mandarinasalarm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.