Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for МАМР | Академия медицинской реабилитации

Channel

МАМР | Академия медицинской реабилитации

@mamrkurs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,672subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001735574980
TypeChannel
Username@mamrkurs
Description◦ 180+ курсов офлайн и онлайн для врачей, спец-тов спорт медицины, АФК и ЛФК, фитнес-инструкторов, логопедов, психологов ◦ Высококвалифицированные преподаватели ◦ Обучаем доступным языком ◦ Работаем с 2009г ◦ 5000+ учеников
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mamrkurs

Growth

9,6729,6859,678.57 August 2026 — 9,685 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,681 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,679 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,672 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,670–9,687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:489,672-7
10 Aug 2026, 12:449,679-2
7 Aug 2026, 20:529,681-4
7 Aug 2026, 05:459,685first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.38%
avg views ÷ 9,672 subscribers
Avg views / post
617
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.741%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held25 (14 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total13,581
Reactions total98
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,250
Videos
512
Links
1,530

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
23m 37s
Average length
3m 22s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4844.0%
👍2724.8%
🔥2522.9%
🙏43.67%
🤔21.83%
🤩21.83%
👌10.917%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
88.0%
22 of 25 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
22
posts carrying an erid · 22 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
672
over 22 measured posts
Median views · rest
357
over 3 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VfnxvPhsm5122 July 202622 July 2026
2VfnxvPib1M18 August 20268 August 2026
2VfnxvhW6uZ110 August 202610 August 2026
2Vfnxvitha311 August 20261 August 2026
2VfnxwDGXWb117 July 202617 July 2026
2VfnxwTsxyh114 July 202614 July 2026
2VfnxwYHxkT15 August 20265 August 2026
2VfnxwctHjR123 July 202623 July 2026
2VfnxwoErn7121 July 202621 July 2026
2VfnxwshCPV17 August 20267 August 2026
2Vfnxwx6pF5111 August 202611 August 2026
2Vfnxx3z1wZ116 July 202616 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 10 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC300 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

«Я в диком восторге от полученных знаний, вдохновения и уже получила первые результаты». Анжела Александровна, благодарим Вас за искренние слова и высокую оценку обучения у Екатерины Валерьевны Дьяковой. 🔗Коллеги, очень вовремя Анжела Александровна (инструктор ЛФК) записала этот отзыв. Он подтверждает: инструментальные техники не заменяют знания и опыт специалиста, а расширяют его возможности и помогают качественне

🔥5👍3

13 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC370 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Благодарим вас за честные ответы в опросе. Они показали, что работа с рубцами остаётся непростой темой даже для практикующих специалистов. Это абсолютно нормально ✅ На самом деле, РУБЕЦ — это не только видимый след на коже, потому что изменения могут затрагивать разные слои тканей, влиять на их подвижность, чувствительность, амплитуду движений и формирование компенсаторных паттернов. Ручные техники, массаж и ЛФК м

👍1

13 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC357 viewsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Коллеги, как вы обычно работаете с рубцами? 🤔

  1. Стандартный массаж + ЛФК (голыми руками)30%
  2. Включаю лимфодренаж и мануальную терапию39%
  3. Честно? Не беру таких пациентов17%
  4. Есть специальные инструменты (ножи, скребки и т.д.)61%
  5. Не уверен (а), как вообще к ним подходить0%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC435 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2Vfnxwx6pF5Photo

🫐Почему после правильной коррекции мышца иногда становится слабее? Представьте: до коррекции мышца показывала слабость. Вы провели воздействие, и при повторном тестировании она стала ещё слабее. 🫐Ошибка? 🫐Не обязательно. Иногда снижение силы после коррекции — важный диагностический результат. 👉🏻 Оно может показывать, что первоначально мышца работала как компенсатор, а после изменения условий нервная система перест

1👍1🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC500 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VfnxvhW6uZPhoto

🫐Почему функциональное мышечное тестирование у одних специалистов становится инструментом диагностики, а у других просто проверкой силы? Потому что опытный специалист оценивает не только результат теста, а понимает, почему мышца ведёт себя именно так. 🫐Слабость может быть следствием боли, компенсации, нарушения биомеханики или защитной реакции. 🫐Пока не найдена причина, работать приходится лишь с последствиями. Им

1👍1🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC531 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VfnxvPib1MPhoto

🫐Самая дорогая ошибка при работе инструментальными техниками: думать, что результат создаёт инструмент. Нет. 👉🏻 Результат создаёт специалист. Один и тот же инструмент в руках разных реабилитологов может дать совершенно разный эффект. 🫐Один работает с местом боли и получает кратковременное облегчение. 🫐Другой находит структуру, которая действительно ограничивает движение, и меняет функцию. Поэтому опытные специали

3👍3🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC521 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VfnxwshCPVPhoto

🫐Почему после одной и той же инструментальной техники один пациент начинает двигаться свободнее, а у другого эффект быстро исчезает? Потому что сами по себе инструментальные техники не решают проблему. 🫐 Они работают только тогда, когда специалист понимает, какая структура ограничивает движение, почему это происходит и как встроить полученные изменения в функцию. Именно поэтому опытные реабилитологи всё чаще уходя

👍32🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC586 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VfnxyP353HPhoto

🫐Почему после одной инструментальной техники походка пациента изменилась уже во время занятия? До работы ножами пациент сокращал шаг, избегал полноценной опоры и переносил нагрузку на другую сторону. 👉🏻 Но после короткого инструментального воздействия походка стала увереннее. Что изменилось? 🫐Не сила мышц, она не могла вырасти за несколько минут. 🫐Изменились условия, в которых выполнялось движение. Точно выбранная

2🔥2👌1👍1

5 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC550 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VfnxwYHxkTPhoto

🫐Ошибка, из-за которой эффект от инструментальной техники исчезает уже к следующему дню После работы ножами пациент чувствует лёгкость, движение становится свободнее, амплитуда увеличивается. 👉🏻 Но уже на следующий день всё возвращается. Почему? Самая частая ошибка: считать, что на этом работа закончена. 🫐Инструментальная техника создаёт новые возможности для движения, но не закрепляет их. 🫐Если сразу не встроить

2🔥1🙏1

3 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC672 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VfnxxtuK3RVideo

🫐Три признака того, что вы тестируете не функцию, а последствия дисфункции 🫐Функциональное мышечное тестирование — это не просто поиск слабой мышцы. Его задача: помочь найти источник нарушения. Но иногда тестирование уводит специалиста в сторону. Как понять, что перед вами не причина, а лишь компенсация? 🫐После коррекции меняется только один тест. Если улучшился результат одной мышцы, а качество движения осталось

👍4

1 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC658 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2Vfnxvitha3Photo

🫐Почему локальная работа не всегда дает результат? Ограничено плечо = лечим плечо. Нарушена осанка = укрепляем спину. 👉🏻 Но тело работает как единая система. Причина нарушения может находиться совсем не там, где проявляется симптом. 🫐 На курсе «Биомеханика человека» специалисты учатся видеть связи между суставами, фасциями, мышечными цепями, иннервацией, дыханием и движением. 🫐В отзыве участница рассказывает, как

1

31 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC697 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VfnxxCsJxBVideo

🫐Когда отрицательный тест говорит больше, чем положительный Многие специалисты концентрируются на положительных тестах: мышца слабая, значит, именно здесь проблема. 👉🏻 Но на практике отрицательный тест нередко оказывается более ценным. Если мышца работает стабильно, несмотря на боль, ограничение движения или жалобы пациента, стоит задуматься: возможно, источник нарушения находится совсем в другом месте. 🫐 Именно о

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @mamrkurs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Коллеги, как вы обычно работаете с рубцами? 🤔

  1. Стандартный массаж + ЛФК (голыми руками)30%
  2. Включаю лимфодренаж и мануальную терапию39%
  3. Честно? Не беру таких пациентов17%
  4. Есть специальные инструменты (ножи, скребки и т.д.)61%
  5. Не уверен (а), как вообще к ним подходить0%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алесь Улищенко | Врач-остеопат, канд. мед. наук | Автор фейспластики
@dr_ales · 470,956
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МАМР | Академия медицинской реабилитации” (@mamrkurs), 9,672 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mamrkurs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.