Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MALYOMAR Engineering

Channel

MALYOMAR Engineering

@malyomar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

282subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001528778710
TypeChannel
Username@malyomar
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/malyomar

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

26728327531 August 2026 — 267 subscribers31 August 2026 — 267 subscribers10 September 2026 — 269 subscribers17 September 2026 — 283 subscribers1 October 2026 — 280 subscribers12 October 2026 — 282 subscribers28231 August 202612 October 2026
6 measurements spanning 42 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 265–285 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 08:37282+2
1 Oct 2026, 11:59280-3
17 Sept 2026, 21:17283+14
10 Sept 2026, 08:42269+2
31 Aug 2026, 03:45267no change
31 Aug 2026, 03:35267first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC14 viewsread 31 August 2026

🚨 THE HYDROSTATIC PARADOX! 🚨 Testing a hydrogen pipe with water is safe... until you turn the hydrogen on! 💧⚠️ Trace moisture left behind from a water test causes brutal Stress Corrosion Cracking in H2 systems. Drying miles of pipe is incredibly difficult and expensive. The B31.12 solution? Helium Sensitive Leak Testing! 🎈 Because Helium atoms are tiny and completely inert, they act as the ultimate safe "stunt double…

26 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

🔗 We're excited to welcome Eng. Mohamed Hussein to the MALYOMAR Engineering family as our new ASME Authorized Training Instructor. 👨🏻‍💼Eng. Mohamed Hussein 🔹Licensed Professional Engineer (P.E.) and Static Equipment Section . 🔹Head at Elsewedy Electric PSP, with a Master's in Mechanical Engineering, MBA. 🔹 Certified SOLIDWORKS Expert (CSWE) credentials — plus 150+ training courses delivered in Mechanical Design,…

👏1

23 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC53 viewsread 31 August 2026

Building a hydrogen facility? Throw out your standard piping joint handbook! 🛑 ASME B31.12 (Part IP) strictly prohibits several types of connections because atomic hydrogen will easily slip right through them. ❌ NO Caulked Joints (Para. IP-5.6) ❌ NO Soldered Joints (Para. IP-5.7.1) Even threaded joints and flanges come with severe restrictions and require specialized sealants or continuous seal-welds to survive H2 …

16 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC66 viewsread 31 August 2026

🚨 REINFORCING THE WEAKEST LINK! 🚨 Every time you cut a hole in a hydrogen pipe for a branch connection, you create a massive structural vulnerability! 🔀💥 ASME B31.12 requires strict "Area Replacement." The total area of steel you add as reinforcement MUST equal or exceed the exact area of the metal you cut out. ⚠️ Crucial Rule: If your pipe is near a vibrating compressor, avoid welding a branch directly to the run pi…

9 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC75 viewsread 31 August 2026

How thick does a hydrogen pipe really need to be? 📏 Inside industrial plants, ASME B31.12 dictates a strict formula: t = PD / 2(S * E * Mf + P * Y) Unlike standard natural gas equations, the denominator here contains the Mf factor (Material Performance Factor). This variable acts as a penalty for hydrogen embrittlement, artificially shrinking the allowable stress of the metal. 📉 The result? The required thickness (t)…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @malyomar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MALYOMAR Engineering” (@malyomar), 282 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/malyomar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.