27 measurements spanning 28 days, net -1,673. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,370–52,730 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 21:57
50,642
-331
3 Sept 2026, 06:08
50,973
-86
1 Sept 2026, 23:33
51,059
+26
31 Aug 2026, 23:46
51,033
-570
30 Aug 2026, 20:48
51,603
+393
29 Aug 2026, 20:12
51,210
-674
28 Aug 2026, 18:17
51,884
-351
27 Aug 2026, 20:12
52,235
+338
26 Aug 2026, 22:55
51,897
+287
25 Aug 2026, 20:16
51,610
+246
24 Aug 2026, 22:34
51,364
-376
23 Aug 2026, 09:53
51,740
+202
21 Aug 2026, 18:06
51,538
-282
20 Aug 2026, 16:43
51,820
-190
19 Aug 2026, 13:38
52,010
+188
18 Aug 2026, 12:43
51,822
+131
17 Aug 2026, 13:29
51,691
-501
16 Aug 2026, 03:34
52,192
+524
14 Aug 2026, 15:34
51,668
-139
13 Aug 2026, 07:14
51,807
first reading
Engagement
867 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.39%
avg views ÷ 50,642 subscribers
Avg views / post
703
851 posts measured
Reaction rate
34.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
867
of 867 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 838 of 851 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held
867 (7 August 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Views total
598,074
Reactions total
207,063
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Sept 2026, 08:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,110
Videos
≈512
Links
≈2,390
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 11s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
207,063 reactions across 838 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5850718284424417857
26,202
12.7%
custom 5424972470023104089
25,751
12.4%
custom 6325570379771283209
25,333
12.2%
custom 6325767939676964769
25,148
12.1%
custom 5422369870165584898
25,004
12.1%
custom 5224427772524376976
24,984
12.1%
custom 5409048419211682843
24,859
12.0%
custom 5217822164362739968
24,812
12.0%
❤🔥
4,970
2.40%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 838 of the 867 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207,063 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 867 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 851 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @malek_eldahab. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 867 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 4 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
انضم دلوقتي حالا لقناة السكالبنج مجااانا بدون اي اشتراكات ✅
و استفيد بصفقات بنقطتين دخول فقققط ستوب 40 بيب و هدف 40 بيب ثابت - معندناش حاجه اسمها عزز ولا حرك الستوب - يعني كسبان كسبان 💵
مستني اييييه 🔥اعمل حسابك من اللينك دة ⬇️
https://signup.godocm.com?ptr=2000217935&rm=390&agr=2788
- و استفيد باعلي سرعه تنفيذ صفقات و شاشه بدون تلاعب 🔫)
ابعتلنا سكالبنج او SCALPING علي المعرف دة ⬇️
@scalping_suport ✅
للانضمام للقناه الخاصه و الاستفاده بتوصيات باهداف كبيره تصل الي 200 و 300 نقطه لاول هدف و بستوبات صغيره محدش هيعرف يدخلك بيها صفقات غير الملك 👑
ابعتلنا كلمه VIP هنا حالا ⬇️
@el_malek001 ✅
استفيد بكامل تحرك الذهب كل يوم و متخليش اتجاه او موجه في الذهب تفوتك ، و تعالي معانا ناخد الذهب طالع نازل💥
Showing the 12 most recent of 867 posts we hold for @malek_eldahab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
SNIPER GOLD @SNIIPER1_GOLD · 49,465 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 August 2026
SIGMA TRADING CLUB @sigma_club_001 · 37,283 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ملك الذهب” (@malek_eldahab), 50,642 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/malek_eldahab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
