Channel
@malbin_pro_law
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,482subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001724244239 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @malbin_pro_law |
| Created | 23 July 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/malbin_pro_law |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 1,482 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 1,483 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 1,483 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 February 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 408 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
332 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 116 | 34.9% | |
| 👍 | 68 | 20.5% | |
| ❤ | 61 | 18.4% | |
| 🔥 | 59 | 17.8% | |
| 👏 | 27 | 8.13% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.301% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 332reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
7 июля 2026 года Конституционный Суд РФ принял к рассмотрению жалобу гражданина М.Е. Сафонова на нарушение его конституционных прав пунктом 1 статьи 81 СК РФ. В этой связи подготовил в инициативном порядке заключение по данному вопросу, где также изложил свое мнение по поводу недавнего законопроекта о внесении изменений в ст. 81 СК РФ. Malbin | PRO law
🔥14👍6😁2❤1👏1
Согласны ли Вы с предложением о том, что адвокат в арбитражном процессе вправе участвовать на основании ордера?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Существует большое число сторонников идеи участия адвоката в качестве представителя в арбитражном процессе на основании ордера. Конечно, значительное число сторонников составляют сами адвокаты. Ключевые доводы такой идеи состоят в том, что: ▫️ для адвоката именно ордер является главным документом, удостоверяющим полномочия адвоката; ▫️ в ГПК РФ есть соответствующее положение об участии адвоката в процессе на основан…
🔥12👏6
Поддерживаете ли Вы идею законопроекта?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сегодня на рассмотрение Государственной Думы РФ поступил законопроект, которым предлагается законодательно закрепить максимальный размер алиментов на ребенка - не более 1,5 размера прожиточного минимума. Идея законопроекта и причины его появления понятны. В правоприменительной практике действительно встречаются случаи, когда с одного из родителей взыскиваются алименты на содержание ребенка, значительно превышающие …
❤2
Обращение имущества в доход государства на основании антикоррупционного законодательства к лицам, никогда не занимавшим публичную должность
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какая норма выступает основанием антикоррупционного иска?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
На минувшей неделе Верховный Суд РФ опубликовал Обзор практики по антикоррупционным спорам. В основном в Обзоре отражены давно апробированные подходы. При этом есть также разъяснения, которые касаются недавно появившейся практики. Одним из таких разъяснений является п. 16 Обзора, в котором указано, что антикоррупционный иск может быть предъявлен к лицу, никогда не занимавшему публичную должность, в случае совершени…
👏6❤2🔥2
Video, posted without a caption
❤11👍1
Экспертное мнение 👨🎓 🎥 Представляем вашему вниманию диалог, посвященный разбору свежайшей судебной практики Верховного суда РФ за первую половину 2026 года в области корпоративных споров. В студии - доцент кафедры гражданского права, к. ю. н. Марина Ивановна Губенко, а также доцент кафедры предпринимательского и корпоративного права, к. ю. н. Дмитрий Андреевич Мальбин. Приятного просмотра! 👇
👍9🔥4❤2
Драма в двух действиях. Действие 1: Юрист: [в судебном споре ссылается на постановление Пленума ВС РФ, правовые позиции ВС РФ] Суд: [при принятии решения не учитывает ни постановления Пленума ВС РФ, ни правовые позиции ВС РФ] Юридическая общественность: «где правовая определенность? Почему суды игнорируют позиции ВС РФ по аналогичным спорам? Куда смотрит ВС РФ? С этим надо что-то делать!» Действие 2: ВС РФ: [пр…
😁43👏10❤7🔥6💯1
Может ли суд при несоразмерности выделяемого имущества взыскать компенсацию в пользу другой стороны без заявления требования об этом?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @malbin_pro_law. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Согласны ли Вы с предложением о том, что адвокат в арбитражном процессе вправе участвовать на основании ордера?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Поддерживаете ли Вы идею законопроекта?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Обращение имущества в доход государства на основании антикоррупционного законодательства к лицам, никогда не занимавшим публичную должность
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какая норма выступает основанием антикоррупционного иска?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Может ли суд при несоразмерности выделяемого имущества взыскать компенсацию в пользу другой стороны без заявления требования об этом?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Malbin | PRO law” (@malbin_pro_law), 1,482 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/malbin_pro_law.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.