Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MAXIMNEV

Channel

MAXIMNEV

@maksim_nevorotov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,382subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001150432401
TypeChannel
Username@maksim_nevorotov
CreatedBetween 1 November 2018 and 31 July 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/maksim_nevorotov

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,3822,3922,38723 August 2026 — 2,390 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,388 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,391 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,392 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,391 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,389 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,384 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,385 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,382 subscribers23 August 202618 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 26 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,381–2,394 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:392,382-3
14 Sept 2026, 20:162,385+1
11 Sept 2026, 09:362,384-5
6 Sept 2026, 06:582,389-2
2 Sept 2026, 04:342,391-1
30 Aug 2026, 01:482,392+1
27 Aug 2026, 12:332,391+3
24 Aug 2026, 16:552,388-2
23 Aug 2026, 14:002,390first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 22 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

181 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10356.9%
custom 53076063425617054182614.4%
🍓116.08%
👍116.08%
❤‍🔥84.42%
😎73.87%
🆒63.31%
🤯63.31%
🍾31.66%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC316 views51 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

чайзер легенда 🦾 заслужил много ваших реакций🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶 также жду видео моих проездов и крэшей🙂‍↕️

🔥41❤‍🔥7custom 53076063425617054183

22 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC324 views21 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Конечно я в шоке , во-первых что мы всей командой просто подняли чайзер с колен после серьезного крэша , во вторых что я смог навязать борьбу в топ32 🫡 Задействовали оптимальные решения по ремонту и как с ноги вытолкнули чайзер доезжать этот день ♨️

🔥18🍾3

22 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC304 views19 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video

Партнёры мероприятия банк УБРИР выбрали меня как самого яркого пилота (видимо за самые эффектные уборки😂) неожиданно и приятно 💸

custom 530760634256170541819

22 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC309 views11 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Чуда не произошло , в топ8 Вова проиграл , но сделал максимум что может его полностью железная Е46 ✊ и дальше нас ждал сюрприз 🤯

🍓11

22 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC328 views10 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

в топ 16 проиграл Федорову Косте 🤝 в следующий раз на нормальной настройке попробуем на реванш попасть 😎 очень интересно заехать на сход развал и посмотреть что с углами подвески и на чем я ехал🫣

👍10

22 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC331 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Мы в деле 💪 Уже прошли в топ 16

🔥17❤‍🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC328 views8 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😎7👍1

22 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC326 views6 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🆒6

22 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC320 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Чинимся чо

custom 53076063425617054184

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @maksim_nevorotov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

No Drift No Fun
@no_drift_n0_fun · 55,702
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MAXIMNEV” (@maksim_nevorotov), 2,382 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maksim_nevorotov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.