Channel
@maksikcrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
173subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002136195838 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maksikcrypto |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maksikcrypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 173 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 174 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 175 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 174 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 174 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
36 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 47.2% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 25.0% | |
| custom 6325331270351979944 | 3 | 8.33% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 5.56% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.56% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.78% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.78% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 2.78% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ще одна майже така ж очевидна логічна ставка по попередній історії. Лягав собі з спокійною душею і зранку бонус 😉 Закупляв по 6 центів те, що Мессі не стане володарем золотого м'яча. Трохи фомо звичайно що не більше ставив, але я не лудік а інвестор, тому і на тому дякую) Дуже жостко)
❤1
На поїсти 🍷💼 Жоско прочитано
Video, posted without a caption
Зайшов сьогодні заробити на тому, що заплановано вже давно. Кому цікаво, ось відео до перегляду: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Da0T2yzSJn1/?igsh=MWw2a2Vsc2NpMmR2 Не скажу що я супер фанат такого, але все виглядає ну дуже дотично. Не здивуюсь якщо Мессі помре за пару років після цього.
❤1
Також відзвітуюсь раз вже пішла жара Купив троха акцій повʼязаних з американською землею під 6% річних з потенціалом в х7 Вижидав майже рік щоб їх купити по хорошечній ціні
👍2
Купа непонятних точок на графіку, але позначка S зверху все що вам треба знати про мої точки продажу
❤1
На фоні падіння)) Х3 до загальної картини якщо хочете порахувати. А що це значить? Що пора закупатись😋
❤1
Хочте прикол? Виставив не на той канал😂 Ща буду заново постить
😁2
Геніальна угода чи моє слабоуміє і я заігрався? Записав новий відос, приємного перегляду. Розповів про попередній сетап, що з того вийшло та що я буду робити далі з Ефіром. Скажіть як вам ну і напишіть що думаєте (Макс лох теж рахується🔫) https://youtu.be/3d2RtsMnn6o
Душний пост Маємо попередньо чітку структуру. Перезакупив частину спота і долив в фючі декілька угод. Очікую підхід назад до ордерблоку і звідти можливо ще одне різке зниження. Дуже гарна угода по ризик менеджменту і структурі. Майже 10 до 1 🐸 Можете також писати що вам цікаво дізнаватись, по ходу загруженості буду ділитись інфою
❤1
Гарно вийшло?) Після вчорашнього посту, де я показав фікс частини позицій, ціна як я і очікував пішла на корекцію. Дуже гарно виходить по моїй стратегії, всі покупки зроблені перед ростом, а продажі перед падінням 👍 Тепер лише залишилось дозакупитись, так як я роблю більшу ставку на те, що надалі буде позитивний ринок. Особливо раджу вам, якщо в вас нічого ще не має, очікую ріст. Ціна звідси може зараз піти трохи …
🔥1
Кому цікаво, трохи графіків з минулого поста🙃 Наглядно можете спостерігати шикарні точки покупки. Всіх попереджав купляти ефір нижче 2000, результат ви бачите. Може багато постів не публікував, але хто реально хотів, мав не одну можливість зайти в ринок 💪 Не бійтесь хто не зайшов, трохи 📈 і в мене є бо трохи продавав і не дозакупив на корекції) Можу розповісти детальніше і де б я добирав ще крипти в свій портфель п…
❤5custom 63253312703519799442🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @maksikcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,075,896 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КриптоМаксік” (@maksikcrypto), 173 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maksikcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.