4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 365–371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 15:42
366
-3
16 Aug 2026, 07:06
369
-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:20
370
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:40
370
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 2 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 07s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
147 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
77
52.4%
👍
38
25.9%
🔥
30
20.4%
👏
1
0.68%
😱
1
0.68%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2025 to 17 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Еще одна палетка и тоже круть.
На этот раз это лимитка от бренда, представленная только в Сефорах.
Horse (лошадь)- так она называется. Это микс из самых популярных оттенков бренда. Здесь нет новинок, в отличие от других палеток. Если у вас уже есть эти оттенки по отдельности или в других палетках, то она вам не нужна. Но если нет, то это отличное приобретение. К качеству претензий нет, здесь и говорить ничего не нужн…
Палетка Deer (олень) от Hourglass. Влюбилась в эту палетку, одна из лучших в бренде на мой взгляд. Идеальная для светлой кожи. Красивые румяна, пудры вообще любовь. Хороший, правильный бронзер.
У кого светлая кожа- это мастхэв. Отличная!
Сегодня была в Концепте на коррекции бровей. В салон завезли новый уход- Celine. Надо сходить, сделать там маникюр. Но, к сожалению, в открытой продаже бренда не будет. Я попробовала лосьон для тела на руках и он мне очень понравился. Аромат нежный и ненавязчивый, увлажнение вроде неплохое.
В магазине покопалась в косметике, понравились моно тени Dior 633 Coral look, текстура глиттер. Такая красивая блестяшечка для з…
https://www.instagram.com/beauty_lux_e?igsh=ZXNiZGFmNXAzaDls Эка показала новые палетки теней от Sisley. Пока вышли только две палетки, но надеюсь, что выпустят еще оттенки, уж больно красивые они получились 😍
Gucci выпускают новую пудру. Чем она будет отличаться от старой- я не совсем поняла. Нам обещают матирование, блюр и т.д.
Tom Ford уже выпустили новые помады. Их уже можно найти в продаже.
👍18
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @makeupandbeaute. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Khadi_dza” (@makeupandbeaute), 366 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/makeupandbeaute.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.