![Telegram profile photo for [Ton|Research]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/a5/a546a94e5b5ce876b5b5dffdcd009a1699b67ca6ef468825fdb42e1dd8bdf5a8.jpg)
Channel
@maketongreateagain
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,203subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002694248839 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maketongreateagain |
| Created | 22 May 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maketongreateagain |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 8,203 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 8,204 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 8,206 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 8,208 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 8,210 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 8,212 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 8,215 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 8,216 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 8,220 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 8,221 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 8,222 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 8,223 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 8,223 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 22 May 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,586 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 593 | 22.9% | |
| 👍 | 554 | 21.4% | |
| ❤ | 529 | 20.5% | |
| 😱 | 306 | 11.8% | |
| 🥰 | 156 | 6.03% | |
| 🤝 | 85 | 3.29% | |
| 👌 | 75 | 2.90% | |
| 🤯 | 72 | 2.78% | |
| 👏 | 59 | 2.28% | |
| 🌚 | 49 | 1.89% | |
| 🌭 | 44 | 1.70% | |
| 🏆 | 41 | 1.59% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 0.348% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 0.193% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 0.193% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.155% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,586 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2025 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I've analyzed the total supply since the listing, and it's estimated at just ~30M. In my experience, there’s bound to be another Bitcat distribution, although the requirements are unclear. Before everything potentially vanishes, you should probably log into your Cattea accounts one last time and swap everything to Btcat. Sincerely
🔥19❤12👍5🫡5
It’s the same old operating model from Pluto that I’m already used to from Catizen. If I understand this correctly, there’s no such thing as 'play-to-earn' or 'free-to-earn'. As for me, I probably won’t suffer a loss since I hold a significant amount of Bitcat—about 50k. But for the vast majority of users here, I honestly feel sorry. Let’s consider this a lesson to better understand the Pluto team; it seems the nearl…
😁9💩5😢4❤1
Regarding the trade error issue where placing and immediately canceling orders resulted in an instant win with approximately 50% profit, the team has already fixed it. Everyone can continue operating as usual. I have had a brief conversation with the admin, and fairness will be ensured for everyone. Please keep doing what you were doing before — all your efforts will not be in vain. 🙂↔️
👍29❤16👏6🥰4
[Ton|Research] pinned «Apologies for the delay. My team and I have spent some time discussing the recent changes in Cattea. Now, it's not just about playing the game—you can also earn tokens through the in-game trading system. I’ll provide a detailed guide on how to trade for profit…»
If nothing changes, Cattea will TGE in Q2. Right now, there’s no new update to share, and I’m also keeping an eye on a few other chains, but I won’t post about them here since this group is TON-only. You can check them out here: https://t.me/hiddengemsx This is a channel dedicated to airdrops on all the popular chains outside of TON 😉 It’s run by a friend of mine, so the credibility is very high. Feel free to join a…
👍30🔥30❤25🤝25
Regarding the issue of not being able to load ads that many of you have been asking me about recently, I’ve looked into it and found that the problem lies with Telegram’s ad system. All versions that run the game on computer/PC simply can’t load the ads — the only exception is mobile phone devices. So if possible, please try using a mobile device even though it’s a bit inconvenient 😂
🥰39🤝36👍32👏21
I don't think the volume leaderboard is created meaninglessly. It's very likely that it contributes to the account's activity score, similar to how you earn points in games for playing or watching ads, etc. If possible, don't ignore this leaderboard.For accounts with a lot of capital, you can use x20 leverage to bypass the position entry limit in order to achieve the highest volume. For those with less $cattea, you c…
👏32🥰32🔥30🤝24
The reason I didn't update anything in this cattea announcement is because this event is for big players with huge deposit amounts. For regular users here, just keep playing the game to accumulate gems and use them in Takeout to earn $cattea. If possible, you should also try a bit with the trading part🤑🤑🤑.
🔥73🤯72😱72❤61
Regarding this latest feature, I find it quite similar to the previous launchpool rounds of Catizen. It's a worthwhile feature to play, so everyone should participate with all their balances to ensure no losses. https://t.me/cattea/273
🌚49❤43👍40🔥27
Compared to the old trading feature, the only notable advantage of Cattea’s new feature is that it allows you to trade with a larger volume (as far as I can see, it's unlimited). However, I don’t recommend it because the risk is significantly higher than with the old trading feature, and it can actually lead to account liquidation if you make a mistake ^^. Therefore, my advice is to try it out, but don’t allocate too…
👍46🌭44❤39👌34
Regarding trading, I don’t encourage people to trade because competing with bots is complex. Bots have an advantage in lucky draws due to their access to more resources compared to playing Triple Tile. Trust me, bots can’t function in this game, but if you have time, you can try trading + lucky draw. I’ll explain the trading method once. 1. Only trade during volatile times. I’ll use UTC+7 time. For example, 8 AM–11 …
🔥229👍226❤209😱201
I will tell you how to trade to win 100% later because I have something to do.
🔥78👍67🥰67❤61
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @maketongreateagain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[Ton|Research]” (@maketongreateagain), 8,203 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maketongreateagain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.