Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Make Europa Snow 🤍❄️🧬

@makeeuropasnow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,412subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001614910693
TypeChannel
Username@makeeuropasnow
Created2 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/makeeuropasnow

Growth

5,4125,4285,4206 August 2026 — 5,428 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,428 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,418 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,412 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,410–5,430 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:375,412-6
10 Aug 2026, 00:035,418-10
6 Aug 2026, 10:335,428no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:575,428first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 37s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,539 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
52820.8%
48719.2%
💯43617.2%
🔥35313.9%
👏2048.03%
🥰1807.09%
🫡1666.54%
❤‍🔥883.47%
🏆491.93%
🎉230.906%
😍110.433%
🍾50.197%
👌40.158%
🤩40.158%
🤗10.039%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,539reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2025 to 9 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2025, 16:45 UTC≈9,100 views136 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

This is so beautiful 🥹🇮🇪 Celtic thunder - Ireland's call

🥰6438🫡15🎉134🤩2

9 Aug 2025, 16:45 UTC≈7,850 views143 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

"London 1960 England, when Men were real Men" 🥺 It's unfortunately true.

76💯42👏119🥰3🏆2

7 Aug 2025, 16:14 UTC≈8,240 views186 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

WHITE CULTURE 🥰🧬🤍

134🥰1817🏆5🔥5❤‍🔥4🫡2🎉1

3 Aug 2025, 14:13 UTC≈7,070 views187 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

"We're all human and we all bleed red" WE'RE NOT THE SAME.

💯1402210🔥7👏6🏆2

30 Jul 2025, 11:47 UTC≈6,810 views183 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Her statement is going viral because non-whites and leftards are upset and angry she liked that everyone looked like her in Ireland 🇮🇪 Wanting to be around your own White Race is a beautiful thing, it's not wrong in wanting this to happen and being happy to be surrounded by your own kind. Constantly being around non-whites is truly repulsive and it gets boring really fast.

💯1332013🔥8👏5❤‍🔥2🥰1🫡1

29 Jul 2025, 17:34 UTC≈4,890 views110 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

White people and White Children are always caring for dogs, because we appreciate them and we treat them like they are part of our family 🥰🥹 It is definitely about Race, always has been and always will be 🧬

6036🥰8💯3🔥2😍1

29 Jul 2025, 17:33 UTC≈4,780 views90 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

YOU EITHER DEFEND YOUR LAND OR YOU WILL LOSE IT! We need to defend our White Nations in order to keep them as ours! There is no point in leaving our White Nations for another White Nation, because in the end l, they will just come for our White Nation that we rebuilt, for them to try and conquer it while wiping us out completely. This is why we should Protect our White Nations, stand our grounds in each of our Whi

53💯27👏5🫡3🔥2

29 Jul 2025, 17:07 UTC≈3,330 views107 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

This is a beautiful thing, this is what I'm talking about when I say WHITE UNITY. We're all adults and we should leave our differences of one another aside (that includes religion and bad past histories) Us Europeans shouldn't be attacking each other, we should be instead uplifting each other, tag teaming one another when we're in trouble like White brothers and White sisters, we should also be fighting side by side

73🔥1710👏4👌3

27 Jul 2025, 12:13 UTC≈3,670 views175 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

White Men, what is stopping you from looking like this and staying fit? 🔥

🫡92💯31🔥19👏12114❤‍🔥3🎉2

26 Jul 2025, 16:02 UTC≈3,650 views141 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

I LOVE THIS FIRE AND ANGER INSIDE THIS WHITE MAN!!!! 🔥 It's what our White people need to act and be like for our White Race to survive!! It's not that fucking hard to hate what threatens our White families, our White people, our White Nations and our White cultures!! ⚡

👏93🏆1612🔥7🍾5💯3🫡3🤩2

26 Jul 2025, 16:01 UTC≈3,700 views124 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Another White Woman saying it how it is!!! I'm telling you now, when the White Women wake up it's all over for non-whites and the jewish subversion 🥹 So instead of attacking White Women and think White Women are bad, how about praising White Women like this in the video, the more you praise White Women like this, the more White Women will join our White Nationalist movement 🥰🔥

🔥68💯21🥰1612🫡6🎉1

26 Jul 2025, 16:00 UTC≈2,930 views127 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

DEFEND EUROPA! 🔥 To all the ones saying it's over for England, it's over for France, it's over for Sweden, it's over for the Germans etc SHUT THE FUCK UP. Did the 200 White Rhodesian Men say we're lost and just gave up when there were 3000 black africans against them? NO they fought back and WON!! ⚡ They were actually Masculine White Men and did their duty in defending their country, it's quite sad to see so many

9118🫡10❤‍🔥5💯1🔥1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @makeeuropasnow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 186,850 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Make Europa Snow 🤍❄️🧬” (@makeeuropasnow), 5,412 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/makeeuropasnow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.