File, posted without a caption
🦄2

Channel
@make_money_tgm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
279subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001125174832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @make_money_tgm |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 31 October 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/make_money_tgm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 279 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 283 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 285 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 285 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
24 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2025 to 19 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @make_money_tgm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 March 2025 to 19 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
File, posted without a caption
🦄2
Представляете, девушка не смотрела Бойцовский клуб. Я в шоке! Как можно было не смотреть шедевр? Еще блин небось и звездные войны не смотрела. Ну а если честно- персонаж под ником Tyler Durden хоть какую то суету наводит в мире подарков. От июньских максимумов мы скатились к февральской истории, когда подарки продавали ниже цены минта) ну а я верю что на рынке циклично, и мы еще увидим пару пампов
❤1👍1💯1🤯1
У меня дежавю. в январе уже было такое - я усердно ждал новых подарков, после того как кепки улучшили. Тогда еще не было маркетов по продаже подарков, и все торговалось в чатах, с гарантами, начали появляться боты гаранты. Но тогда тоже прям локальный бум на торговлю подарками был. В общем я ждал ждал новых подарков. Еще даже сюда писал что буду новые ловить) и устал ждать, и как то внимание переключилось, а новых п…
Lambo запустили апку с лутбоксами, пишут, что выпадают подарки (можно открыть позже и получить x2 боксов) В тапалки уже веры нет, хоть это и проект фаундера Stone.fi , особых надежд нет, но потыкать че бы и нет. Хоть денег не просят, а что то даже разыгрывают Запуск через месяц https://t.me/wen_Lambo_bot/wenlambo?startapp=925173dea43edd7
🤔1
Вот на секундочку какая экосистема выстраивается вокруг подарков. Умельцев много, каждый уже что то накодил, и все хотят себе рефералов в маркетах😂 Да ладно, я тоже не исключение) Подарки интегрированы в телеграм и скорее всего это тема надолго, как и юзернеймы и анонимные номера. Тем более за передачу подарков Паша имеет комиссию в 25 звезд с каждой передачи. То есть это не просто выпустили и забыли
✍1🫡1
Папка с фарм ботами, в которой были тапалки, постепенно превращается в папку с маркетами подарков и ботами для подарков. Ну и ладно) правда контента будет больше про подарки, они же торгуются за TON. так что Ton не забываем
✍1👌1
Тренды, тренды, тренды
🤔1
Ааааа, лол. оказывается есть какой то функционал. Просто UX непривычный. Ну чтож, за 1000 звезд посмотреть на фото голых телок, скорее всего сгенерированных нейросетью, не хотите? Это теперь такой уровень миниапов в Телеграм? Прав был Ворм- свинарник No games. No tasks. Watch Girls & Earn TON. чистый кликбейт, смотри телок и зарабатывай тон. Так тон ты там только потратить можешь, и заработать только если твои рефер…
👍1😁1
Пздц, сидишь тут думаешь, думаешь, функционал какой то пилишь. А можно просто 2 картинки вставить, прикрутить рефералку и логин с кошелька и уже запускаться у инфлов. https://t.me/onlytonsapp_bot/nude?startapp=298877581 Косят естессно под OnlyFans, я уж подумал какой то функционал скрыт за 3мя рефералами, а хрен там. любимое SOON. Пидорасы, че
🤔1
Floor Tonnel: Durov's Cap💎 ID: 1467💰 Цена: 230.94 TON Floor MRKT: Durov's Cap💎 ID: 4187💰 Цена: 258.74 TON Floor Fragment: sooon
продолжаю пилить парсер, добавил второй маркет в отслеживание
А ты купил подарок?😂 Но в целом рад за Пашку, не унывает. Мы ж все таки с одного города)
🐳1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @make_money_tgm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tyler TON Болтун” (@make_money_tgm), 279 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/make_money_tgm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.