Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Makahon

@makahond

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,086subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001125085832
TypeChannel
Username@makahond
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/makahond

Growth

1,0851,0881,086.57 August 2026 — 1,085 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,085 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,087 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,088 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,086 subscribers1,0867 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,085–1,088 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:351,086-2
10 Aug 2026, 16:011,088+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:131,087+2
7 Aug 2026, 05:311,085no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:251,085first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.0%
avg views ÷ 1,086 subscribers
Avg views / post
706
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held19 (20 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total5,646
Reactions total152
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

457 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17538.3%
🫡10422.8%
9821.4%
😁6313.8%
🔥122.63%
😢30.656%
🤔20.438%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 457reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC483 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тю! А шо такое? 4 года ж нормально было всё?

👍18😁15

26 Jul 2026, 11:39 UTC785 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Як же бісять люди які не витримують дистанцію і втикають...

👍20😁61🤔1

26 Jul 2026, 06:53 UTC743 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Потери техники за 2 недели по данным Орикс. Россия потеряла 110 единиц, Украина 98. Соотношение 1,1 к 1. Похоже тут пока не отображены потери в результате российской атаке при участии 10 танков один из которых был оснащен активной защитой Арена-М.

🫡124👍3

21 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC739 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Думаю всі хто більш менш слідкує розуміє до чого ми рухались на фронті. Реально в плануванні операцій Сирський топ.

👍8🫡31

21 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC905 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @adbestias

Дякую за службу, генерале Сирський. Роздумуючи над персоною О. С., я досі не доходжу до однозначних висновків. Не будучи знайомим особисто, важко розділити, що в успіхах й невдачах було пов'язано з його особистими якостями, а що з якостями виконавців та його керівництва. Армійська система комплексна, й внесок однієї особистості (навіть на найвищій посаді) розмивається серед багатьох. Обставини сильніші ніж людина. В

🫡94👍2🤔1

19 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC835 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня только сводка. Словил ячмень на глаз, как понимаете не ок с таким в эфир) https://youtu.be/4KnqorNJ5GU

🫡13👍6😢3

12 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC936 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Cделал видео на двух языках, заняло много времени, так что не факт, что сегодня будет ДЭ, ну и по результатам просмотров посмотрю буду ли дальше их делать. В общем старая добрая "Ситуация на фронтах" https://youtu.be/_H_TAv50kd4?si=kPhMtTUS3kWdL0Vk

18👍5

12 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC918 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Потери техники за 1 месяц по данным Орикс. Россия потеряла 250 единиц, Украина 286. Соотношение 1 к 1,1. Потери техники за последний месяц выросли но в основном за счет артиллерийский систем у обеих сторон. Хотя 27 танков у россиян это тоже не так чтобы мало для данного этапа войны.

🫡114

6 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC≈1,260 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Люди гинуть під обстрілами в ліжках, тому що їм часто банально немає куди йти. Хоча навіть звичайний підвал будинку значно підвищує шанси на виживання, проте в Києві підвали часто в такому стані, що краще туди і не заходити. Що я б зробив за ці 4+ роки війни для захисту мешканців Києва, керуючі його ресурсами? 1. Провів би аудит всіх існуючих сховищ, укриттів і підвалів, щоб розуміти повну картину, та визначив би най

👍594

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @makahond. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Makahon” (@makahond), 1,086 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/makahond.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.