христос воскрес, а наш кф нет
❤16🍓4🍾3💘2🎄1
Signed lian sx5 kisser #il999

Channel
@mak3upp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
155subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001918315011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mak3upp |
| Description | по вопросам к одному из адм ляня >> @SHENLIANya саша >> @sasha_frowen (в ресте) вся информация в закреплённом сообщении 🍓 |
| Created | 6 September 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mak3upp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 155 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 155 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 15 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
128 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 24.2% | |
| 💊 | 25 | 19.5% | |
| 💅 | 15 | 11.7% | |
| 💘 | 15 | 11.7% | |
| 🍓 | 14 | 10.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 4.69% | |
| 🎄 | 6 | 4.69% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 4.69% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 3.13% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 3.13% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2024 to 5 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
христос воскрес, а наш кф нет
❤16🍓4🍾3💘2🎄1
Signed lian sx5 kisser #il999
Посоветуйте качественные чёрные помады/тинты/блески!! Желательно не матовые ибо слишком быстро пересушивают губы 😊 ───────── прислать тейк → @makeupcf_bot ꒰ @mak3upp ꒱ !! ꒰ #тейк ꒱
💊7🍓1🍾1
Signed lee sx5 kisser
хэй-йо, мне пришла палетка love generation "i am who i want to be", зацените что сделала!! тени использовались только из этой палетки, карандаши от того-же бренда, аквалайнеры от 7days, и помада Beauty Bomb only mate 04 "Matilda" (могу перепутать название и номер оттенка, но это самый тёмный(после чёрного) оттенок из всей ленейки, думаю найдёте). сколько от 1 до 10????? ───────── прислать тейк → @makeupcf_bot ꒰ @ma…
❤6🍓2💋2💘2💊1
Signed lee sx5 kisser
Всем привет!! Я только начинаю краситься, что можете сказать об этом консилере? ───────── прислать тейк → @makeupcf_bot ꒰ @mak3upp ꒱ !! ꒰ #тейк ꒱
🙏6💊3👀2
Signed lee sx5 kisser
неанон Зюмия ───────── прислать тейк → @makeupcf_bot ꒰ @mak3upp ꒱ !! ꒰ #тейк #yourmakeup ꒱
💘8❤2💊1💋1
Signed lee sx5 kisser
Привет мейкапкф у меня вопрос Обязательно ли наносить праймер? Я вроде понимаю что он как бы основа под тон но я ни разу не юзал и не знаю нужно ли Подскажите 🙏 Неанон вио проблематек ───────── прислать тейк → @makeupcf_bot ꒰ @mak3upp ꒱ !! ꒰ #тейк ꒱
🎄5🍓1💊1💘1
Signed lee sx5 kisser
давно задумываюсь над покупкой румян, какие румяна (оттенок) подойдут такой коже с русыми волосами (на солнце отдают рыжим), карими глазами и азиатским разрезом глаз? очень боюсь не угадать с оттенком, поэтому прошу помощи ───────── прислать тейк → @makeupcf_bot ꒰ @mak3upp ꒱ !! ꒰ #тейк ꒱
🍓4💅1💊1💘1
Signed lee
посоветуйте автозагар и расскажите как им пользоваться 👉🏻👈🏻 ───────── прислать тейк → @makeupcf_bot ꒰ @mak3upp ꒱ !! ꒰ #тейк ꒱
💊3
Signed lee
кто тоже красится как сбежавший с притона нарколыга? ───────── прислать тейк → @makeupcf_bot ꒰ @mak3upp ꒱ !! ꒰ #тейк ꒱
💅8❤1🍓1💊1
Signed lee
подскажите пожалуйста, как и где можно подобрать нужный тон и консилер?? ───────── прислать тейк → @makeupcf_bot ꒰ @mak3upp ꒱ !! ꒰ #тейк ꒱
💅2💊1
Signed lee
с чего начать если 0 опыта? просто купить и наносить, или что, можете описать? где вообще лучше покупать косметику? ───────── прислать тейк → @makeupcf_bot ꒰ @mak3upp ꒱ !! ꒰ #тейк ꒱
❤🔥6❤3🍓1💊1💋1💘1
Signed lee
какой праймер можно взять для макияжа из ЗЯ ───────── прислать тейк → @makeupcf_bot ꒰ @mak3upp ꒱ !! ꒰ #тейк ꒱
💅3💊1
Signed lee
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mak3upp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 924,752 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💄! ! makeup confession” (@mak3upp), 155 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mak3upp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.