Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

超级签TF上架ios签名不死签开发者账号证书

@majie07

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002577488021
TypeChannel
Username@majie07
Description‎完美解决99.9%安卓机型报毒 · ‎免费试用,满意再付 · ‎apk爆毒处理-安卓报毒处理~*
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/majie07

Growth

58 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers8 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:455no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:325first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 5 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 January 20265 August 2026)
Views total2
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTCviews —

超级签TF上架ios签名不死签开发者账号证书 pinned «支持全国语言 😔😔 企业签,拥有多本独立证书,稳定持久,保障APP的稳定性,让应用无需上架APP store 即可快速下载安装,测试满意在付款,免费更新,掉签免费秒补。 😣😣MDM签,V3签,独立后台,独立书,稳定持久,按量计费,免费更新,掉签免费秒补。 😔😔TF签,不需要在设置里信任,下载好即用,下载一次可用90天不掉,持久稳定,免费更新,掉签免费秒补。 😔😔超级签,独立后台,按下载计费,免费更新,掉签免费秒补。 apk安卓报毒,免杀,防毒,过白,免费更新。 🎲需求联系: @cs365bot @Cdncloudxiyan»

5 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026

支持全国语言 😔😔 企业签,拥有多本独立证书,稳定持久,保障APP的稳定性,让应用无需上架APP store 即可快速下载安装,测试满意在付款,免费更新,掉签免费秒补。 😣😣MDM签,V3签,独立后台,独立书,稳定持久,按量计费,免费更新,掉签免费秒补。 😔😔TF签,不需要在设置里信任,下载好即用,下载一次可用90天不掉,持久稳定,免费更新,掉签免费秒补。 😔😔超级签,独立后台,按下载计费,免费更新,掉签免费秒补。 apk安卓报毒,免杀,防毒,过白,免费更新。 🎲需求联系: @cs365bot @Cdncloudxiyan

31 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTCviews —

超级签TF上架ios签名不死签开发者账号证书 pinned «✅免签证书上新,欢迎选用‼️ 💼 证书名称: ZG 💼 证书状态: 有效 🟢 自助打包免签应用:@wap2bot 🚀免费测试: @Kf363bot @uup998»

31 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026

✅免签证书上新,欢迎选用‼️ 💼 证书名称: ZG 💼 证书状态: 有效 🟢 自助打包免签应用:@wap2bot 🚀免费测试: @Kf363bot @uup998

1 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026

好几年了,我们见证了太多项目的起起落落。 不变的,是那份“稳”的执念。 我们不只是签名服务,更是你身边的隐形助力。 【苹果签名 & 资源对接服务】 ✔️ 超级签、企业签、TF签,稳定源头 ✔️ 🎉双向联系: @cs364bot @OTC678

28 Jun 2026, 07:33 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026

老板一句“不要测试”, 我这边立刻表情管理失控—— 直接掏出胖嘟嘟可爱宝宝上线: “啊?老板这是……对我完全信任的眼神?” 既然您都这么笃定了, 那我也不绕圈子了—— 测试?不重要。 流程?随便它。 信任?拉满就对了。 先打款?您一句话,我立刻点头如捣蒜! 毕竟您放心, 我安心, 宝宝都看着呢: “老板要给钱钱啦!” 😎💰👶✨ 🔝随时对接: @Kf365bot @bkgf66

9 May 2026, 06:42 UTC2 viewsread 13 August 2026

已经开启接单模式😎 ios苹果超级签 企业签 TF签 个签稳定不掉签,独立证书更稳定,可封装安卓apk、苹果ipa服务,只需提供H5链接、应用Logo、应用名称即可。提供分发下载页面,客户安装后,APP稳定时间长达半年,无掉签烦恼。 APK过毒免杀: 安卓APK全机型过毒/加固免杀。支持海内外安卓机型加固过毒免杀处理,可实现随时自动加固打包过毒,灵活方便,无后顾之忧。 ✅apk报毒 ✅超级签名 ✅封装app ✅苹果签名 ✅企业签名 ✅TF签名 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 🏆随时对接: @cs366bot @dnkj1818

21 Mar 2026, 11:25 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «超级签TF上架ios签名不死签开发者账号证书»

21 Mar 2026, 11:14 UTC2 viewsread 13 August 2026

🔥 超级 V2 / V3 / MDM 模式 ✅ 支持安卓外链、内链 —— 不管你放外面还是内部链接,都能跑 ✅ 防劫持 + 高防加固 —— 不怕被拦截、不怕被劫持,更稳 ✅ CDN 全球加速 —— 哪都能快速打开,不卡 ✅ 重复下载只算一次 —— 不重复扣量,省钱又放心 🎁联系方式: @cs364bot @tlsign

20 Mar 2026, 14:41 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026

超级签、企业签、TF 到底怎么选? 🍎 iOS 签名选购指南:哪款更适合你? 很多客户进场就问“哪种最稳?”,看完这篇你就懂了: 超级签 (Super Sign): 独立 ID 消耗,稳定性极佳,适合高价值精准流量,单价略高但省心。 企业签 (Enterprise): 适合大规模分发,量大管饱。注意: 证书质量决定一切,我们只推独家直营独立证书。 TF (TestFlight): 苹果官方渠道。转换率高,免信任,稳定性强,适合主流应用长期运营。 MDM/V3 免签: 一次安装,终身可用,彻底告别掉签焦虑。 💡 专业建议: 根据你的产品类型免费制定最优方案。 ⭐️快快联系我: @cs366bot @fuliqianm

18 Mar 2026, 09:21 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026

大家下午好 和大家说下为什么会报毒 🥹🥹🥹 Q:为什么 APK 一安装就报毒? 🤔 A: 很多时候不是 APP 本身有问题, 而是 封装特征、权限行为或历史特征 被系统风控拦截, 所以会提示风险,甚至直接报毒。 Q:这个问题能解决吗? A: 可以的 👍 我们会 直接对安装包进行处理: ✔️ 动态加固处理 ✔️ 清理报毒特征 ✔️ 优化安装行为 ✔️ 适配各类安卓系统风控 常见的 病毒特征库基本都有记录 🔵双向联系: @Kf365bot @yltaiwan

17 Mar 2026, 19:51 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026

🎲为什么你的 APP 会频繁报毒? 代码特征扫描: 华为、OPPO 等系统会对安装包进行动态代码扫描,检测到敏感插件或不合规权限立即报毒。 下载域/落地页红名: 很多时候不是包毒,而是你的分发域名被拦截。 🐱 我们的对策: 独家 混淆加密 + 动态过毒 技术,彻底打乱特征码。不只是简单的签名,而是从底层重构应用指纹,让系统扫描“无从下手”。 🎰合作联系: @Kf363bot @addBBf

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @majie07. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 202,041 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“超级签TF上架ios签名不死签开发者账号证书” (@majie07), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/majie07.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.