Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Maison 77

Channel

Maison 77

@maisonn77

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

284subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002388531030
TypeChannel
Username@maisonn77
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/maisonn77

Growth

279284281.520 August 2026 — 279 subscribers20 August 2026 — 279 subscribers21 August 2026 — 280 subscribers29 August 2026 — 283 subscribers5 September 2026 — 284 subscribers20 August 20265 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 16 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 278–285 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 07:21284+1
29 Aug 2026, 10:07283+3
21 Aug 2026, 11:27280+1
20 Aug 2026, 19:15279no change
20 Aug 2026, 19:00279first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 16 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 284 subscribers
Avg views / post
55.9
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held17 (16 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total951
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC34 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

В Москве Kelly 25 noir epsom phw 2026 22€ уточнение деталей: Алена

Signed Alena

20 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC49 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Kelly 25 gold GHW Togo K новая полный комплект Москва 19,200€ уточнение деталей: Алена

Signed Alena

20 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC48 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

B25 Blue Brume Epsom Phw Z уточнение деталей: Алена

Signed Alena

19 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC59 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Мюли Hermes Oz, в отличном состоянии, размер 38, полный комплект 60т уточнение деталей: Алена

Signed Alena

19 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC60 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

pre loved Hermes ❤️ все сумки в прекрасном состоянии. до получения вами заказа, на каждую сумку мы делаем аутентификацию на ваш выбор эти и многие другие сумки Hermes можно заказать уточнение деталей: Алена

Signed Alena

19 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC56 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Редчайшая Келли 35 джилис Q идеал в комплекте коробка пыльник без чека 1,380.000 уточнение деталей: Алена

Signed Alena

19 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC62 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🆕🩵 Pastel Blue K20 Sellier PHW | Mini Kelly II 20 Epsom Bleu Zéphyr уточнение деталей: Алена

Signed Alena

19 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC73 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

kp hss noir/ gris perle stamp g 21,500€ уточнение деталей: Алена

Signed Alena

19 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC74 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

B25 vert moyan cargo ship phw 2026 K stamp уточнение деталей: Алена

Signed Alena

19 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC71 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Kelly 25 gold GHW Togo K новая полный комплект В Москве 19,300€ уточнение деталей: Алена

Signed Alena

18 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC57 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

B25 ment shadow В Москве 💚 уточнение деталей: Алена

Signed Alena

18 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC55 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

B25 Biscuit Togo GHW B New Fullset 23.000€ уточнение деталей: Алена

Signed Alena

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @maisonn77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Maison 77” (@maisonn77), 284 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maisonn77.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.