Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

main news

@mainnews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,573subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001043212638
TypeChannel
Username@mainnews
Created21 March 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mainnews

Growth

12,57312,59512,5845 August 2026 — 12,595 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,595 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,588 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,587 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,588 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,580 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,575 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,578 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,573 subscribers5 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,570–12,598 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:0512,573-5
12 Aug 2026, 20:1312,578+3
10 Aug 2026, 21:3112,575-5
9 Aug 2026, 20:5212,580-8
8 Aug 2026, 20:5212,588+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:2512,587-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:1012,588-7
6 Aug 2026, 02:3312,595no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:3612,595first reading

Engagement

238 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.29%
avg views ÷ 12,573 subscribers
Avg views / post
665
238 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.365%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
238
of 238 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 102 of 238 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held238 (5 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total158,348
Reactions total279
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

268 reactions across 91 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🖕8130.2%
👍4516.8%
2710.1%
💩259.33%
🤬238.58%
👏207.46%
🤣145.22%
😁62.24%
🥱62.24%
🔥41.49%
🤮41.49%
😢31.12%
🤡20.746%
🫡20.746%
🍌10.373%
👎10.373%
💋10.373%
😡10.373%
😭10.373%
🤨10.373%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 238 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 238 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC16 viewsread 13 August 2026

[경향신문] 내년 1월부터 ‘비거주 1주택자’ 전세대출 제한···갭투자 차단 조치 https://www.khan.co.kr/article/202608131200001

13 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC111 viewsread 13 August 2026

[한국경제] 서울에 年 3만가구 공급…재개발 동의율 75→70%로 https://www.hankyung.com/article/202608138067i

13 Aug 2026, 03:06 UTC124 viewsread 13 August 2026

[동아일보] 수도권·규제지역 비거주 1주택자, 내년부터 전세대출 막힌다 https://www.donga.com/news/Economy/article/all/20260813/134469949/1

13 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC130 viewsread 13 August 2026

[중앙일보] 남양주 그린벨트·서울 염창공원 2만7000가구 추가 공급 나선다 https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/25453040

13 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC502 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

[한겨레] 멸종위기종 사냥하는 길냥이…‘캣맘 그만’ vs ‘살처분 과해’ 또 논쟁 http://hani.co.kr/arti/animalpeople/human_animal/1272667.html

😭1

13 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC620 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

[한국경제] "반도체주 훨훨 날아간다"…삼전 5%·SK하닉 7%↑ https://www.hankyung.com/article/2026081384346

🖕1

13 Aug 2026, 01:24 UTC638 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

[경향신문] “김구=빨갱이” 불매 운동까지···독립운동가 모욕글 넘쳐나는 SNS https://www.khan.co.kr/article/202608131016001

🤬6👍4🤡1

13 Aug 2026, 00:54 UTC758 viewsread 13 August 2026

[동아일보] 트럼프 전용기 기만작전, 푸틴에 비하면 애들 장난...어떻기에? https://www.donga.com/news/Inter/article/all/20260813/134469524/1

13 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC839 viewsread 13 August 2026

[코리아헤럴드] Incheon overtakes Heathrow as world’s busiest international airport http://www.koreaherald.comhttps://www.koreaherald.com/article/10839320

13 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC820 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

[프레시안] "이 사회가 우리 집이다" 춤으로 말하는 탈시설 장애인들의 자립가 http://m.pressian.comhttp://m.pressian.com/m/pages/articles/2026081220584191471

🫡2👎1

12 Aug 2026, 23:49 UTC816 viewsread 13 August 2026

[경향신문] “무료 맥주와 영생을 드립니다”···포퓰리즘 때린 ‘강아지당’ 진짜 구청장·시의원 나왔다 https://www.khan.co.kr/article/202608130600031

12 Aug 2026, 23:49 UTC801 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

[코리아헤럴드] Lee vows full backing for 7 future industries to drive next wave of growth http://www.koreaherald.comhttps://www.koreaherald.com/article/10839012

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 238 posts we hold for @mainnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 266,305 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“main news” (@mainnews), 12,573 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mainnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.