4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 582–666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 04:08
656
+58
6 Aug 2026, 17:48
598
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:42
598
+6
6 Aug 2026, 03:06
592
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
78.4%
avg views ÷ 656 subscribers
Avg views / post
514
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (27 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
9,768
Reactions total
518
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
518 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
382
73.7%
🔥
42
8.11%
🙏
29
5.60%
🕊
24
4.63%
👍
23
4.44%
👏
6
1.16%
👌
3
0.579%
💯
3
0.579%
😍
3
0.579%
🍾
2
0.386%
🤔
1
0.193%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 518reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🗣 در تجربه اشراق، نفس (ایگو یا منِ اجتماعی) رها و خنثی میشود و در همان لحظه، چشم باطن گشوده میگردد.
در این مقام، تفاوت میان «من» و سایر اشیا از بین میرود و فرد با تمام هستی مطلقاً یکی میشود.
✨سهروردی در حکمتالاشراق و سایر عرفا این حالت را معادل «فنا» (متلاشی شدن در معشوق) و بازتاب نور حق در دل میدانند.
🗣 تدریجی بودن مسیر و ناگهانی بودنِ واقعه: اگرچه آمادهسازی برای این مقام نیازمند تمرینات، تهذیب نفس، تخلیه…
🗣 ردیابی فرافکنیها در قضاوتهای بیرحمانه:
ما ویژگیهای سرکوبشده، تاریکیها و امیالی را که در خود نمیپذیریم، بر روی دیگران فرافکنی (پروجکت) میکنیم.
👈 بنابراین، بدترین و بیرحمانهترین قضاوتهایی که نسبت به دیگران (بهویژه نزدیکان و پارتنر خود) روا میداریم، در واقع آدرس دقیق سایههای خودمان است.
اگر رفتار کسی به شدت شما را آزار میدهد، او در حال زندگی کردنِ جنبههای نزیسته و انکارشدهی روان شماست.
#محمود_پو…
🗣 دقت اول مملو از تعاریف برچسبها قضاوتها دستهبندیها و ارزشگذاریهای ماست.
ما دنیا رو آنگونه که هست نمیبینیم، ما آنگونه ما دنیا رو آنگونه میبینیم که آگاهیمون داره برای ما توصیفش میکنه.
توصیف دنیا بین ما و دنیا قرار گرفته.
دقت دوم یعنی گشودن راهی برای حضور بیشتر ناوال (خویشتن اصیل)
و این توانایی دیدن انرژی پتانسیل و الگوهای پنهان و ساختارهای متعالی و معنای هر چیز است.
✨ به جای دیدن، فقط برچسبی که از ا…
🗣 ادراک عادی ما، دقت اول، تونالمون، جایی که ما تحت تاثیر آموزشهای جامعه هستیم.
جایی که ما اونجا اصطلاحاً گیر کردیم، جایی که میتونیم به واژگان مذهبی بگیم هبوط اتفاق افتاده، ما هبوط کردیم.
اینجا چیزی تحت عنوان دیدن وجود ندارد.
دیدن روی واقعی دنیا.
اینجا فقط توصیف وجود دارد.
اینجا فقط برچسب زدن وجود دارد.
ما درباره هر چیزی مدام در حال گفتگوی درونی هستیم.
بدون انقطاع.
همین الان هم که دارید حرفای من رو میخونید، ی…
🗣 تفاوت حال و مقام در عرفان
پیشرفت معنوی، سفری آگاهانه از «چشیدن» (حال) به «بودن» (مقام) است؛ سفری که از درگاه طراحیشدهٔ تغییر (تشرف) عبور میکند.
«حال» مانند تماشای پیشنمایش یک فیلم است؛ برای لحظهای طعم آرامش یا وحدت را میچشید، اما این تجربه سرانجام از میان میرود.
هدف مسیر معنوی آن است که این تجربههای گذرا، یکی پس از دیگری، مانند آجرهایی روی هم قرار گیرند تا «مقام» ساخته شود.
وقتی زیرساخت درونی به انداز…
🗣 وقتی انسجام و همراستایی ایجاد میشه بین قوای قلبی و مغزیمون، بین ذهن و بدن و قلبمون، اون زمان در تجربه معنوی برای ما بازتر میشود.
اونجا جاییست که ما راحتتر در معرض درک و دریافت این تجربه قرار میگیریم، چون اون تجربه همیشه وجود داره، ولی ما نمیتونیم احساسش کنیم.
#محمود_پورآزاد
@mahmoudpourazad
موضوعات بیرونی مهم نیستند
مهم، مدل مهندسی مغز ما در تجزیه و تحلیل اونهاست..
اگر ادراک ما فاقد عشق باشد، هر چیزی در دنیای بیرون در ما احساس خطر برانگیخته می کند..
«عشق یکی از بنیادیترین قوانین این کیهان است.»
به شکل سمبولیک، در ادبیاتی مثل سیندرلا میبینیم که در اعماق آن زندان نغمهی «او» به گوش میرسد..
عشق از بین نمیرود؛
فقط گاهی آن را فراموش میکنیم..
ما به یادآوریهای مکرر نیاز داریم تا این قانون را در آگاه…
🗣 خرابات:
خورآباد.
جایگاه تجلی نور.
خور از خورشید می آید.
از نور و روشنایی.
منطقه ای در مشرق که خورشید آن را آباد می کند.
خور تجلی ذات خداوند است.
در خورآباد آنچه باعث روشنی است فره ایزدی است.
خورآباد آتش کده، خانه نور و معرفت و شناخت است.
خورآباد جایی است که رهروان راه حق از باده معرفت و شناخت سرمست می شود.
جایی که به واسطه استاد، پیر که میانجی و واسطه است برای انوار حق، به وحدت و مودت می رسند.
در خورآباد آنچه …
❤16🔥4🕊3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mahmoudpourazad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 80,610 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محمود پورآزاد” (@mahmoudpourazad), 656 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mahmoudpourazad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.