Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Magic Internet Money Printer

Channel

Magic Internet Money Printer

@magicmoneyprinter

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

20subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001660026310
TypeChannel
Username@magicmoneyprinter
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 22 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged5 times, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/magicmoneyprinter

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

202120.57 August 2026 — 21 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 22 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–21 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 20:2620-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:1521no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:0921first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍350.0%
❤233.3%
🔥116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2022 to 8 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Dec 2022, 17:12 UTC357 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x97b846db4e521a07185d3da4408a12897316b618 Possible alpha play at a dip now. Waiting to get more info on it. 80k Tres Leches Cake

👍1

31 Oct 2022, 16:43 UTC452 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Boom 💥 This looks like its gonna run. Lots of hype behind Elon buying twitter so this could be the play of the day. 3x and counting….. Follow @magicmoneyprinter for banger BSC and ETH stealth launch plays 💰

31 Oct 2022, 16:35 UTC287 viewsread 11 August 2026

BSC Degen https://t.me/elogeinu https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x49e2c0a01be442100f48ec983ff840972cb6de80 8k mc

28 Oct 2022, 14:03 UTC394 viewsread 11 August 2026

BSC Degen Found this Indonasian coin trying to build up an Indo community first before setting up a global community chat. Gamble but ca seems safu but I don’t understand anything in the chat https://t.me/MobawarcoinID https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x73a6506db278705fd2d740857b21b98120b7f577 2.5k

20 Oct 2022, 22:02 UTC263 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

5x and counting! Looks bullish af. 100k soon!!!

20 Oct 2022, 21:52 UTC191 viewsread 11 August 2026

BSC Degen https://t.me/official_wag1 https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xbca16e4d8d0ce45f58c1e83790801bcc8d4c454a 1.5k mc Looks interesting and we are quite early.

18 Sept 2022, 02:32 UTC235 viewsread 11 August 2026

Sold! Whitepaper copied off this https://blog.pantherprotocol.io/zk-rollup-projects-inner-workings-importance-analysis/ Did 15k ath thats still 8x hope you guys took profit. Still over 3x from call. Holding a moonbag

18 Sept 2022, 01:30 UTC222 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

BSC degen play https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xc43321689b483953d668cb4861180165ef3bd608 https://t.me/OpsideNetwork Website and whitepaper live so should do good. Mc - 2.5k

31 Aug 2022, 13:38 UTC144 viewsread 11 August 2026

I pulled out initial at 2x. Seems like a larp the more I looked into it. Babydoge deployer sent 3.5 BNB 425 days ago to the wallet which sent 5 ETH to Hainu deployer. It could have just been a payment for an influencer or some sort of marketing so risky. I pulled out initials and left the rest so let’s see how far this plays out.

31 Aug 2022, 08:58 UTC129 viewsread 11 August 2026

ETH play Got a decent bag here and I’ll be adding more if it dips. Babydoge team behind it which went to 2 Billion MC - 1m https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xed64e2f667cda074a1920ff6335ef9e083cd20cd

25 Aug 2022, 16:01 UTC136 viewsread 11 August 2026

ETH GAMBLE Really low mc. K0de fork I think with escrow services. Could play out well like Block-e or just be shit 14k mc https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x5b46B6b060Cae886B52D5E92B4fEC717D6aD7b16 https://t.me/soliditybotportal

24 Aug 2022, 17:47 UTC194 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Kaiji is pumping hard. Over 10x since call and looks like its going to keep pumping Do you hear thar Brrrrrrr?

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @magicmoneyprinter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Magic Internet Money Printer” (@magicmoneyprinter), 20 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/magicmoneyprinter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.